Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:30:11.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communication and Cognition: Is Information the Connection?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Colin Allen  and
Marc Hauser
Colin Allen
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, Harvard University
Marc Hauser
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, Harvard University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Among cognitive ethologists, communication is widely supposed to be a good area for comparing animal minds (e.g., Cheney & Seyfarth 1990; Griffin 1991, and other contributions to Ristau 1991). There is, however, considerable controversy about how to define or characterize communication. We will not survey these attempts in this paper (see Philips & Austad 1990). Rather, we focus on conceptions of communication as transfer of informationfrom signaler to receiver. In conjunction with descriptions of human cognition in information processing terms, this conception encourages the idea that communication provides a “window” on animal thoughts’ (Griffin 1991, p.3). The first step in getting beyond this metaphor is to identify possible relationships between information and cognition. This paper attempts that first step.

Type
Part IV: Cognitive Ethology
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1992 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1992 , 1993 , pp. 80 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Philosophy of Science Association

References

Allen, C. (1992), “Mental Content and Evolutionary Explanation”, Biology & Philosophy 7: 1-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekoff, M. and Allen, C. (1992), “Intentional Icons: Towards an Evolutionary Cognitive Ethology”, Ethology 91: 1-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, D. L. and Seyfarth, R. M. (1990), How Monkeys See the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1983/1987), “Intentional Systems and Cognitive Ethology: the ‘ Panglossian Paradigm’ Defended”, Behavioral & Brain Sciences 6: 343-345. Reprinted as chapter 7 in The Intentional Stance. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. I. (1981), Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gouzoules, S., Gouzoules, H. and Marler, P. (1984), “Rhesus Monkey Screams: Representational Signaling in the Recruitment of Agonistic Aid”, Animal Behaviour 32: 182-193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, D. R. (1991), “Progress Toward a Cognitive Ethology”, in Cognitive Ethology: the Minds of Other Animals, C.A. Ristau (ed.) Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 3-17.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D. and Marler, P. (in press a), “Food Associated Calls in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta). I. Socioecological Factors'', Behavioral Ecology.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D. (in press b), “Food Associated Calls in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta). II. Costs and Benefits of Call Production and Suppression”, Behavioral Ecology.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D. and Nelson, D. A. (1991), “Intentional’ Signaling in Animal Communication”, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6(6): 186-189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, S. (1990), “Antelope Activate the Acacia's Alarm System”, New Scientist 127 (September29): 19.Google Scholar
Krebs, J. R. and Dawkins, R. (1984), “Animal Signals: Mind-reading and Manipulation”, in Behavioral Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach, J.R. Krebs & N.B. Davies (eds.). New York: Sinauer Associates, pp. 380-402.Google Scholar
Macedonia, J. (1991), “What is communicated in the Antipredator Calls of Lemurs: Evidence from Playback Experiments with Ring-tailed Lemurs”, Ethology 86: 177-190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marler, P. (1992), “Functions of Arousal and Emotion in Primate Communication”, in Topics in primatology, vol. 1, T. Nishida, W. McGrew, P. Marler, M. Pickford, F.B.M. deWaal) (eds.). Tokyo: Tokyo University Press, pp. 225-234.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (1984), Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (1990), “Compare and Contrast Dretske, Fodor, and Millikan on Teleosemantics”, Philosophical Topics 18 (2): 151-161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munn, C. (1986a), “The Deceptive Use of Alarm Calls by Sentinel Species in MixedSpecies Rocks of Neotropical Birds”, in Deception: Perspectives on Human and NonhumanDeceit, R.W. Mitchell & N.S. Thompson (eds.). Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 143-158.Google Scholar
Munn, C. (1986b), “Birds that ‘Cry Wolf“’, Nature 319: 143-145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philips, M., and Austad, S. N. (1990), “Animal Communication and Social Evolution”, in Interpretation and Explanation in the Study of Animal Behavior, voll, lnterpretation, lntentionality, and Communication, M. Bekoff & D. Jamieson (eds.). Boulder: Westview Press, pp 254-268.Google Scholar
Ristau, C. A. (ed.) (1991), Cognitive Ethology: the Minds of Other Animals. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L., and Marler, P. (1980), “Monkey Responses to Three Different Alarm Calls: Evidence for Predator Classification and Semantic Communication”, Science 210: 801-803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949), The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Smith, W. J. (1990), “Communication and Expectations: a Social Process and the Cognitive Operations it Depends upon and Influences”, in Interpretation and Explanation in the Study of Animal Behavior, vol I, Interpretation, Intentionality, and Communication, M. Bekoff & D. Jamieson (eds.). Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 234-253.Google Scholar
Stich, S. (1992), “What is a Theory of Mental Representation?”, Mind 101 : 243-263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, R. H. (1983), ‘The Evolution of Communication: Infonnation and Manipulation”, in Communication ,T.R. Halliday and P.J.B. Slater (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 82-113.Google Scholar