Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:43:30.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Arter Eurocentrism: Challenges for the Philosophy of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Sandra Harding*
Affiliation:
University of California—Los Angeles
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Criticisms of the effects of Western sciences and their technologies on Third World societies are not new to Westemers. For decades both Third World and Western authors have analyzed and protested the frequent ill effects in the Third World of Western asswnptions, concepts, paradigms and practices in health care, ecology, militarism, socalled economic “development” and its associated technology transfers.

Type
Part X. New Directions in the Philosophy of Science: Issues of Gender and Race
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Philosophy of Science Association

References

Adas, M. (1989), Machines as the Measure of Man. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Amin, S. (1989), Eurocentrism. New York: Monthly Review.Google Scholar
Bernal, M. (1987), Black Athena : The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization. Vol. I New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Goonatilake, S. (1984), Aborted Discov ery: Science and Creativity in the Third World. London : Zed.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1989), Primate Visions: Gender, Race and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1991), Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Ithaca:Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1992a), “After the Neutrality Ideal: Science, Politics and ‘Strong Objectivity’”, Social Research 59: 567-87.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1992b), “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology”, Feminist Epistemologies, L. Alcoff and E. Potter (eds). New York:Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (ed.) (1993), The “Racial” Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Haskell, T. L. (1990), “Objectivity is Not Neutrality”, History and Theory 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, T. (1979), The Role of Medicine : Dream, Mirage or Nemesis. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Moraze, C. (ed.). (1979), Science and the Factors of Inequality. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Nandy, A. (ed.) (1990), Science, Hegemony and Violence: A Requiem/or Modernity. Delhi: Oxford.Google Scholar
Needham, J. (1954ft), Science and Civilization in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Needham, J. (1969), The Grand Titration: Science and Society in Eastand West. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Petitjean, P., et al (1992), Science and Empires: Historical Studies About Scientific Development and European Expanswn. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A. (ed.) (1992), Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, H. and Rose, S. (1979), “The Incorporation of Science”, Ideology oflin the Natural Sciences H. Rose and S. Rose (eds.). Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman.Google Scholar
Sardar, Z. (ed.) (1988), The Revenge of Athena: Science, Exploitation and the Third World. London: Mansell.Google Scholar
Shiva, V. (1989), Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. London: Zed.Google Scholar
Todorov, T. (1984), The Conquest of America; The Question of the Other, tr. Richard Howard. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Van den Daele, W. (1977), ‘'The Social Construction of Science”, The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge, E.Mendelsohn, P. Weingart, R. Whitley, eds. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Van Sertima, I. (1986), Blacks in Science. New Brunswick : Transaction.Google Scholar
Weatherford, J. M. (1988), Indian Givers: What the Native Americans Gave to the World. New York: Crown.Google Scholar