Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:21:16.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surviving Scandal: The Institutional and Political Dynamics of National and State Executive Scandals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2013

Brandon Rottinghaus
Brandon Rottinghaus*
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Which factors shorten or lengthen the survival of a scandal involving a chief executive? Using new data tracking scandals involving presidents and governors from 1972 to 2011, I chart the duration of each political, personal, and financial scandal faced by an elected official, their staff, or nominees. I specifically examine institutional, political, and economic factors to investigate what factors quicken a “negative” end to a scandal. National chief executives and their staff are more likely to survive a scandal when they have more partisans in the legislature but are less likely when there is greater political opposition, however there is no comparative effect at the state level. Positive economic growth and public approval have no effect on survival of a scandal at either the national or state levels. These findings clarify how the political environment shapes the duration of executive scandal.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 131 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andolina, Molly W., and Wilcox, Clyde. 2000. “Public Opinion: The Paradoxes of Clinton's Popularity.” In The Clinton Scandals and the Future of American Government, eds. Rozell, Mark J. and Wilcox, Clyde. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ayers, B. Drummond Jr. 1999. “Political Briefing; Political Soap Opera Rivets Mississippi.” New York Times, June 11. Google Scholar
Baker, Gerard. 2009. “Sex Americana.” The Wall Street Journal, July 3. Google Scholar
Basinger, Scott, and Rottinghaus, Brandon. 2012a. “Skeletons in the White House Closets: An Empirical Investigation into Modern Presidential Scandals.” Political Science Quarterly 127 (2): 213–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basinger, Scott, and Rottinghaus, Brandon. 2012b. “Stonewalling: Explaining Presidential Behavior During Scandal.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2): 290–302.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Jody C., and Kada, Naoko. 2003. Checking Executive Power: Presidential Impeachment in Comparative Perspective. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J. 2005. DURSEL: A Program for Duration Models with Sample Selection (Stata version). Version 2.0. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa. Google Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J., Morley, Daniel S., and Shannon, Megan. 2006. “Selection Bias and Continuous-Time Duration Models: Consequences and a Proposed Solution.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 192–207.Google Scholar
Book of the States 2010. The Council of State Governments. Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Karp, Jeffrey A.. 2004. “Politicians, Scandals and Trust in Government.” Political Behavior 26 (3): 271–87.Google Scholar
Brody, Richard A., and Shapiro, Catherine R.. 1989. “Policy Failure and Public Support: The Iran-Contra Affair and Public Assessment of President Reagan.” Political Behavior 11: 353–69.Google Scholar
Brown, Lara M. 2006. “Revisiting the Character of Congress: Scandals in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1966–2002.” The Journal of Political Marketing 5 (2): 149–72.Google Scholar
Brown, Lara M. 2007. “It's Good to Be an Incumbent: Scandals, Corruption, and the 2006 Midterm Election.” Extension of Remarks, APSA Legislative Studies' Section Newsletter, Vol. 30, No. 1. Google Scholar
Busby, Robert. 1999. Reagan and the Iran-Contra Affair: The Politics of Presidential Recovery. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Cannon, Lou. 2005. “Lessons of Scandals Past.” The Washington Post, October 31. Google Scholar
Chanley, Virginia A., Rudolph, Thomas J., and Rahn, Wendy. 2000. “The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government. A Time Series Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64 (3): 239–56.Google Scholar
Cleves, Mario, Gould, William, Gutierrez, R. Obertto G., and Marchenko, Yulia V.. 2010. An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata. College Station, TX: StataCorp.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. 1972. “Regression Models and Life-Tables.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34: 187–220.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R., and Snell, E. J.. 1968. “A General Definition of Residuals.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 30 (2): 248–75.Google Scholar
Dimock, Michael A., and Jacobson, Gary C.. 1995. “Checks and Choices: The House Bank Scandal's Impact on Voters in 1992.” Journal of Politics 57 (4): 1143–159.Google Scholar
Doherty, David, Dowling, Conor M., and Miller, Michael G.. 2011. “Are Financial or Moral Scandals Worse? It Depends.” PS 44: 749–57.Google Scholar
Dunn, Charles W. 1999. The Scarlet Thread of Scandal. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ellis, Richard J. 1994. Lightning Rods: The Politics of Blame Avoidance. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Entman, Robert M. 2012. Scandal and Silence: Media Responses to Presidential Misconduct. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai. 1995. Capital Corruption: The New Attack on American Democracy. 2nd ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Farrar-Myers, Victoria A. 2012. “The Ripple Effect of Scandal and Reform.” In Watergate Remembered, eds. Genovese, Michael A. and Morgan, Iwan W.. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Franklin, Ben A. 1977. “Governor Mandel Guilty on Charges of Fraud and Racketeering.” New York Times, August 24. Google Scholar
Garment, Suzanne. 1992. Scandal: The Culture of Mistrust in American Politics. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Genovese, Michael A. 2012. “Presidential Corruption: A Longitudinal Analysis.” In Corruption and American Politics, eds. Genovese, Michael A. and Farrar-Myers, Victoria A.. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.Google Scholar
Genovese, Michael A., and Farrar-Myers, Victoria A.. 2012. Corruption and American Politics. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.Google Scholar
Genovese, Michael A., and Morgan, Iwan W.. 2012. Watergate Remembered: The Legacy for American Politics. New York: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Benjamin, and Shefter, Martin. 1999. Politics by Other Means: Politicians, Prosecutors and the Press from Watergate to Whitewater. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Gerald. 2000. Historical Encyclopedia of U.S. Independent Counsel Investigations. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Grossman, Mark. 2003. Political Corruption in America: An Encyclopedia of Scandals, Power, and Greed. 2nd edition. Westport, CT: ABC-Clio; Google Scholar
Harrell, F. E. Jr., Califf, R. M., Prior, D. B., Lee, K. L., and Rosati, R. A.. 1982. “Evaluating the Yield of Medical Tests.” Journal of the American Medical Association 247: 2543–546.Google Scholar
Harrell, F. E. Jr., Lee, K. L., and Mark, D. B.. 1996. “Multivariate Prognostic Models: Issues in Developing Models, Evaluating Assumptions and Adequacy, and Measuring and Reducing Errors.” Statistics in Medicine 15: 361–87.Google Scholar
Harrison, Eric. 1996. “Mystery Shrouds Crash of Mississippi Governor.” Los Angeles Times, December 18. Google Scholar
Hinojosa, Victor J., and Perez-Linan, Anibal S.. 2006. “Presidential Survival and the Impeachment Process: The United States and Colombia.” Political Science Quarterly 121 (4): 653–75.Google Scholar
Kagay, Michael R. 1999. “Public Opinion and Polling during Scandal and Impeachment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63 (2): 449–63.Google Scholar
Kim, Young Hun, and Bahry, Donna. 2008. “Interrupted Presidencies in the Third Wave Democracies.” Journal of Politics 70 (3): 807–22.Google Scholar
Kiousis, Spiro. 2003. “Job Approval and Favorability: The Impact of Media Attention to the Lewinsky Scandal on Public Opinion of Bill Clinton.” Mass Communication & Society 6: 435–51Google Scholar
Klarner, Carl E. 2003. “Measurement of the Partisan Balance of State Government.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 3 (Fall): 309–19.Google Scholar
Kumlin, Staffan, and Esaiasson, Peter. 2012. “Scandal Fatigue? Scandal Elections and the Satisfaction with Democracy in Western Europe, 1977–2007.” British Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 263–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, Howard. 1991. “Scandal.” The Washington Post, September 22. Google Scholar
Lang, Gladys Engel, and Lang, Kurt. 1983. The Battle for Public Opinion: The President, the Press, and the Polls during Watergate. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, D. Y., and Wei, L. J.. 1989. “The Robust Inference for the Cox Proportional Hazard Model.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 84 (4): 1074–78.Google Scholar
Long, Kim. 2007. The Almanac of Political Corruption, Scandals, and Dirty Politics. New York: Delacorte Press.Google Scholar
Marion, Nancy E. 2010. The Politics of Disgrace: The Role of Scandal in American Politics. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Markovits, Andrei S., and Silverstein, Mark. 1988. “Power and Process in Liberal Democracies.” In The Politics of Scandal: Power and Process in Liberal Democracies, eds. Markovits, Andrei S. and Meier, Mark Silverstein New York: Holmes and.Google Scholar
Maurer, Paul J. 1999. “Media Feeding Frenzies: Press Behavior during Two Clinton Scandals.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 29 (1): 65–79.Google Scholar
Meinke, Scott R., and Anderson, William D.. 2001. “Influencing from Impaired Administrations: Presidents, White House Scandals, and Legislative Leadership.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (4): 639–59.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H. 1999. “Sex, Politics, and Public Opinion: What Political Scientists Really Learned from the Clinton-Lewinsky Scandal.” PS: Political Science 32 (4): 721–29.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan. 2009. Strategic Outrage: The Politics of Presidential Scandal. PhD Dissertation, Duke University. Google Scholar
Puglisi, Riccardo, and Snyder, James M. Jr. 2011. “Newspaper Coverage of Political Scandals.” Journal of Politics 73 (30): 931–50.Google Scholar
Quirk, Paul J. 1998. “Coping with the Politics of Scandal.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 28 (4): 898–902.Google Scholar
Roberts, Robert N., and Doss, Marion T. Jr. 1997. From Watergate to Whitewater: The Public Integrity War. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Rosen, David. 2009. Sex Scandal America: Politics and the Ritual of Public Shaming. Toronto: Key Publishing House.Google Scholar
Ross, Shelley. 1988. Fall From Grace: Sex, Scandal, and Corruption in American Politics from 1702 to Present. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Rottinghaus, Brandon, and Bereznikova, Zlata. 2006. “Exorcising Scandal in the White House: Presidential Polling in Times of Crisis.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 36: 493–505.Google Scholar
Rozell, Mark J. 2002. Executive Privilege: Presidential Power, Secrecy, and Accountability. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Rozell, Mark J., and Wilcox, Clyde. 1999. “Scandal and Government: Current and Future Implications of the Clinton Presidency.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32 (3): 554–57.Google Scholar
Sabato, Larry J. 1993. Feeding Frenzy: How Attack Journalism Has Transformed American Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sabato, Larry J., Stencel, M., and Lichter, S. R.. 2000. Peepshow: Media and Politics in the Age of Scandal. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Schultz, Jeffrey. 1999. Presidential Scandals. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Shear, Michael D. 2011. “No Guide to Survive a Scandal.” The New York Times, June 12. Google Scholar
Sonner, Molly W., and Wilcox, Clyde. 1999. “Forgiving and Forgetting: Public Support for Bill Clinton During the Lewinsky Scandal.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32 (3): 554–57.Google Scholar
Stanley, Harold W., and Niemi, Richard G.. 2011. Vital Statistics on American Politics, 2011–2012. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Szasz, Andrew. 1986. “The Process and Significance of Political Scandals: A Comparison of Watergate and the ‘Sewergate’ Episode at the Environmental Protection Agency.” Social Problems 33 (3): 202–17.Google Scholar
Thompson, John B. 2000. Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Waisbord, Silvio. 2004. “Scandals, Media and Citizenship in Contemporary Argentina.” American Behavioral Scientist 47 (8): 1072–98.Google Scholar
Witcher, Russ. 2004. “The Media.” In Watergate and the Resignation of Richard Nixon: Impact of a Constitutional Crisis, eds. Jeffrey, Harry P. and Maxwell-Long, Thomas. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, C. Vann. 1974. Responses of the Presidents to Charges of Misconduct. New York: Delacorte Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1999. “Monica Lewinsky's Contribution to Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31 (2): 182–89.Google Scholar
Zeleny, Jeff. 2010. “Now It's Democrats Who Feel Sting of Scandal.” The New York Times, March 5. Google Scholar
Zorn, Christopher J. W. 2000. “Modeling Duration Dependence.” Political Analysis 8 (3): 367–80.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Rottinghaus supplementary material

Appendix tables 1 and 2

Download Rottinghaus supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 477.9 KB