Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:25:03.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reflexive Openness as Collaborative Methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2021

Susan Thomson Open the ORCID record for Susan Thomson [Opens in a new window]
Susan Thomson*
Affiliation:
Colgate University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Quantitative and Qualitative Collaborative Methodologies
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 530 - 534
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerly, Brooke A., Friedman, Elisabeth Jay, Menon, Krishna, and Zalewski, Marysia. 2020. “Research Ethics and Epistemic Oppression.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 22 (3): 309–11. DOI: 10.1080/14616742.2020.1771006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Political Science Association. 2015. “About,” Qualitative Transparency Deliberations. www.qualtd.net/page/about#:~:text=The%20Qualitative%20Transparency%20Deliberations%20%28QTD%29%20platform%20provides%20fora,range%20of%20qualitative%20empirical%20approaches%20in%20Political%20Science.Google Scholar
American Political Science Association. 2020. “About the Editors; Vision Statement by Editors.” American Political Science Review. July. www.apsanet.org/Publications/Journals/American-Political-Science-Review/About-the-Editors.Google Scholar
Ansoms, An, Bisoka, Aymar Nyenyezi, and Thomson, Susan (eds.). Forthcoming. Fieldwork in Africa: The Ethics of Researcher Vulnerability. London: James Currey Publishers.Google Scholar
Autesserre, Severine. 2021. The Frontlines of Peace: An Insider’s Guide to Changing the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouka, Yolande. 2015. “Researching Violence in Africa as a Black Woman: Notes from Rwanda.” Working Paper Series. http://conflictfieldresearch.colgate.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Bouka_WorkingPaper-May2015.pdf.Google Scholar
Clark-Kazak, Christina. 2007. “Understanding Vulnerability: From Categories to Experiences of Congolese Young People in Uganda.” Children & Society 21 (4): 284–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin-Furman, Kate, and Lake, Milli. 2018. “Ethics Abroad: Fieldwork in Fragile and Violent Contexts.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (3): 607–14.Google Scholar
Firchow, Pamina, and Gellman, Mneesha. 2021. “Collaborative Methodologies: Why, How, and for Whom?” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521000330.Google Scholar
Fujii, Lee Ann. 2012. “Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (4): 717–23.Google Scholar
Gellman, Mneesha. 2021. “Collaborative Methodology with Indigenous Communities: A Framework for Addressing Power Inequalities.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521000299.Google Scholar
Häkli, Jouni. 2020. “What Can a Flat Ontology Teach the Legislator?” Dialogues in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820620940055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1987. “The Method Question.” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 2 (3) Part 1: 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Alan M., Büthe, Tim, Ana Arjona, Leonard R. Arriola, Eva Bellin, Andrew Bennett, Lisa Bjorkman, et al. 2021. “The Qualitative Transparency Deliberations: Insights and Implications.” Perspectives on Politics. doi: 10.1017/S1537592720001164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana, MacLean, Lauren Morris, and Read, Benjamin L. (eds.). 2015. Field Research in Political Science: Practices and Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krystalli, Roxani C. 2021. “Narrating Victimhood: Dilemmas and (In)Dignities.” International Feminist Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2020.1861961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, Milli, Majic, Samantha, and Maxwell, Rahsaan. 2019. “Research on Vulnerable and Marginalized Populations.” February 13. American Political Science Association Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, Qualitative Transparency Deliberations, Working Group Final Reports, Report IV.3. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3333511.Google Scholar
Lemarchand, Rene. 2021. Remembering Genocides in Central Africa. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonardo, Zeus. 2018. “Dis-Orienting Western Knowledge: Coloniality, Curriculum and Crisis.” Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 36 (2): 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLean, Lauren M., Posner, Elliot, Thomson, Susan, and Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2019. “Research Ethics and Human Subjects: A Reflexive Openness Approach.” February 12. American Political Science Association Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, Qualitative Transparency Deliberations, Working Group Final Reports, Report I.2. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3332887.Google Scholar
Mama, Amina. 2000. “Why We Must Write: Personal Reflections on Linking the Alchemy of Science with the Relevance of Activism.” Agenda: Empowering Women for Gender Equity 46:13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbembe, Achille. 2000. On the Postcolony. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Sarah E. 2018. “The Dignity of Complexity: Being Human in Political Science.” Qualitative and Multi-Method Research (Special Issue Remembering Lee Ann Fujii) 16 (1): 39–41.Google Scholar
Quatrini, Allison. 2020. “If My Participants Say, “You’re Wrong,” Does It Mean I Really Am?” Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, August 21.Google Scholar
Schatz, Edward (ed.). 2009. Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine. 2014. “Judging Quality: Evaluative Criteria and Epistemic Communities.” In Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretative Turn, second edition, ed. Yanow, Dvora and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, 120–146. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, and Yanow, Dvora. 2012. Interpretative Research Design: Concepts and Processes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples, second edition. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Soedirgo, Jessica, and Glass, Aarie. 2020. “Towards Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (3): 527–31.Google Scholar
Thomson, Susan. 2009. “‘That Is Not What We Authorised You to Do…’: Access and Government Interference in Highly Politicised Research Environments.” In Surviving Field Research: Working in Violent and Difficult Situations, ed. Sriram, Chandra Lekha, King, John C., Mertus, Julie A., Martín-Ortega, Olga, and Herman, Johanna, 108–24. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thomson, Susan. 2013a. Whispering Truth to Power: Everyday Resistance to Reconciliation in Post-Genocide Rwanda. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, Susan. 2013b. “Academic Integrity and Ethical Responsibilities in Post-Genocide Rwanda: Working with Research Ethics Boards to Prepare for Fieldwork with ‘Human Subjects.’” In Emotional and Ethical Challenges for Field Research in Africa: The Story Behind the Findings, ed. Thomson, Susan, Ansoms, An, and Murison, Jude, 139–54. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Susan. 2013c. “Agency as Silence and Muted Voice: The Problem-Solving Networks of Unaccompanied Somali Refugee Girls in Eastleigh, Nairobi.” Conflict, Security and Development 13 (5): 589–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Susan. 2019. “Engaged Silences as Political Agency in Post-Genocide Rwanda: Jeanne’s Story.” In Rethinking Silence, Voice and Agency in Contested Gendered Terrains, ed. Parashar, Swati and Parpart, Jane, 110–23. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thomson, Susan. Forthcoming. “Scholar–Activist? On Relational Accountability and an Ethic of Dissemination.” In Fieldwork in Africa: The Ethics of Researcher Vulnerability, ed. Ansoms, An, Bisoka, Aymar Nyenyezi, and Susan, Thomson. London: James Currey Publishers.Google Scholar
Vlassenroot, Koen. 2020. “Can Collaborative Research Projects Reverse External Narratives of Violence and Conflict.” Africa at LSE blog, May 8. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/africaatlse/2020/05/08/collaborative-research-methods-projects-reverse-external-narratives-violence-conflict-drc.Google Scholar