Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T22:27:39.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mitigating Mormonism: Overcoming Religious Identity Challenges with Targeted Appeals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2013

Brian Robert Calfano ,
Amanda Friesen  and
Paul A. Djupe
Brian Robert Calfano
Affiliation:
Missouri State University
Amanda Friesen
Affiliation:
Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis
Paul A. Djupe
Affiliation:
Denison University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A persistent challenge for minority candidates is mitigating negative effects attributed to their unpopular group identity. This was precisely the case for Mitt Romney, a Mormon, as he sought and captured the 2012 Republican presidential nomination. We draw on existing public opinion data about the tepid reaction to Romney's Mormonism from within Republican ranks. Then, we review our own experimental data to examine a potential mitigation strategy, “God Talk,” and its emotional costs to the GOP. We find that Romney and similar candidates may avoid direct penalty by party rank-and-file for their minority attributes when using God Talk, but the associated affective response supporters direct at their party may carry yet-unknown putative costs for both party and candidate.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 562 - 568
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berinsky, Adam. J., and Mendelberg, Tali. 2005. “The Indirect Effect of Discredited Stereotypes in Judgments of Jewish Leaders.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 845–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Aaron, and Henderson, Nia-Malika. 2012. “Rick Santorum Drops out of the Presidential Race.” The Washington Post, April 10.Google Scholar
Boutron, Isabelle, John, Peter, and Torgerson, David J.. 2010. “Reporting Methodological Items in Randomized Experiments in Political Science.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 628: 112–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calfano, Brian Robert, and Djupe, Paul A.. 2009. “God Talk: Religious Cues and Electoral Support.” Political Research Quarterly 62: 329–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calfano, Brian Robert, and Djupe, Paul A.. 2011. “Not in His Image: The Moderating Effect of Gender on Religious Appeals.” Politics and Religion 4: 338–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Gurin, Gerald, and Miller, Warren E.. 1954. The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Campbell, David E., Green, John C., and Monson, J. Quin. 2012. “The Stained Glass Ceiling: Social Contact and Mitt Romney's ‘Religion Problem’.” Political Behavior 34: 277–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 74: 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinni, Dante, and Gimpel, James. 2010. Our Patchwork Nation: The Surprising Truth and the “Real” America. New York: Gotham Books.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Debenedetti, Gabriel. 2012. “How They Voted: A Closer Look at the Reuters/Ipsos Exit Poll.” Reuters, November 10.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Calfano, Brian R.. 2013. God Talk: Experimenting with the Religious Causes of Public Opinion. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckholm, Erik. 2012. “Evangelicals Hurry to Find Alternative to Romney.” The New York Times, January 12.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray J. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Michael. 2012. “Romney's Shifting Focus Defies Tested Campaign Strategy.” Los Angeles Times, August 19.Google Scholar
Funk, Carolyn L. 1996. “The Impact of Scandal on Candidate Evaluations: An Experimental Test of the Role of Candidate Traits.” Political Behavior 18: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P., and Kaplan, Edward H.. 2004. “The Illusion of Learning from Observational Research.” In Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, eds. Shapiro, Ian, Smith, Roger M., and Massoud, Tarek E.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., Calfano, Brian R., and Aronow, Peter M.. forthcoming. “Field Experimental Designs for the Study of Media Effects.” Political Communication.Google Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2005. “Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 908–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Michael A., and Abrams, Dominic. 1988. Social Identifications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1992. “Political Parties and Electoral Mobilization: Political Structure, Social Structure, and the Party Canvass.” American Political Science Review 86: 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1994. “Issues, Candidate Image, and Priming: The Use of Private Polls in Kennedy's 1960 Presidential Campaign.” American Political Science Review 88: 527–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerit, Jennifer. 2004. “Survival of the Fittest: Rhetoric during the Course of an Election Campaign.” Political Psychology 25: 563–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keele, Luke, McConnaughy, Corrine, and White, Ismail. 2012. “Strengthening the Experiment's Toolbox: Statistical Estimation of Internal Validity.” American Journal of Political Science 56: 484–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, David C., and Patterson, Samuel C.. 1997. “Living Up to Expectations: Public Attitudes Toward Congress.” Journal of Politics 59: 701–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., Peters, Mark D., Abelson, Robert P., and Fiske, Susan T.. 1980. “Presidential Prototypes.” Political Behavior 2: 315–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Gerald. H. 1970. “The Effects of Precinct-Level Canvassing on Voting Behavior.” Public Opinion Quarterly 34: 560–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kranish, Michael, and Viser, Matt. 2012. “Romney Showing His Mormon Faith.” The Boston Globe, August 21.Google Scholar
Kucinich, Jackie. 2012. “Evangelicals Mobilize for Romney Campaign.” USA Today, October 17.Google Scholar
Kuo, David P. 2006. Tempting Faith: An Inside Story of Political Seduction. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2001. “The Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 951–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing during Election Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leege, David, Wald, Kenneth D., Krueger, Brian S., and Mueller, Paul D.. 2002. The Politics of Cultural Differences: Social Change and Voter Mobilization Strategies in the Post-New Deal Period. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E. 2002. The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., and MacKuen, Michael B.. 1993. “Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement during Presidential Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 87: 672–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelberg, Tali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. Gregory. 2010. “The Bradley Effect: Mediated Reality of Race and Politics in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election.” American Behavioral Scientist 54: 417–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Public Religion Research Institute. 2012. “Survey: Evangelical Voters Strongly Support Romney despite Religious Differences.” May 10. http://publicreligion.org/research/2012/05/may-rns-2012-research/ (accessed September 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M., Aldrich, John H., Borgida, Eugene, and Sullivan, John L.. 1990. “A Social Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal.” In Information and Democratic Process, eds. Ferejohn, John A. and Kuklinski, James H.. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., Hensler, Carl P., and Speer, Leslie K.. 1979. “Whites' Opposition to ‘Busing’: Self-interest or Symbolic Politics?” American Political Science Review 74: 670–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Williamson, Vanessa. 2011. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, and Turner, John C.. 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, eds. Worchel, Stephen and Austin, William G.. Chicago: Nelson.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nichoas A., Brader, Ted, Groenendyk, Eric W., Gregorowicz, Krysha, and Hutchings, Vincent L.. 2011. “Election Night's Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation.” Journal of Politics 73: 156–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, Tom. 2012. “Edison Successfully Conducts the 2012 National Election Exit Polls.” Edison Research. http://www.edisonresearch.com/home/archives/2012/11/edison-successfully-conducts-the-2012-national-election-exit-polls.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+edisonresearch%2FTZWb+%28Edison+Research%29.Google Scholar