Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:03:31.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Political Science: An Inventory and Assessment since the 1980's

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Adrian Prentice Hull
Adrian Prentice Hull*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado at Boulder
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 1999 , pp. 117 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1999

Footnotes

*

I gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments and criticisms of my advisor James Scarritt, James Caporaso, David Lai, Glen Galaich, Robert Lopez, Adam Resnick, Roberta Gibbons, and Chuck Tooman. Errors and omissions are, of course, the fault of the author.

References

Almond, Gabriel A. 1960. “Introduction: A Functional Approach to Comparative Politics.” In The Politics of the Developing Areas, ed. Almond, Gabriel A. and Coleman, James S. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., and Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 1966. Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Boston: Little and Brown.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. 1983. A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry. 1996. “Comparative Politics and the Replication Controversy.” APSA-CP: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics 7(Winter): 8,11.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H. 1997. “Comparative Politics and Rational Choice: A Review Essay.” American Political Science Review 91(September): 699–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Robert H. 1996a. “Area Studies and the Discipline.” APSA-CP: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics 7(Winter): 1–2.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H. 1996b. “The Death of Comparative Politics?” APSA-CP: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics 7(Summer): 1–2.Google Scholar
Blalock, Hubert M. Jr. 1968. “The Measurement Problem: A Gap between the Languages of Theory and Research.” In Methodology in Social Research, ed. Blalock, Hubert M. Jr. and Blalock, Ann B. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Blalock, Hubert M. Jr. 1969. Theory Construction: From Verbal to Mathematical Formulations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Budziszewski, J. 1984. “A Homily on Method.” Journal of Politics 46(August): 739–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crotty, William, ed. 1991. Political Science: Looking to the Future. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” In Strategies of Inquiry. Volume 7 of Handbook of Political Science, ed. Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul K. 1978. Against Method: An Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Finifter, Ada, ed. 1983. Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1991. “Paradigms and Sand Castles in Comparative Politics.” In Political Science, Looking to the Future, ed. Crotty, William. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander. 1979. “Case Study and Theory Development.” In Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory, and Policy, ed. Lauren, Paul Gordon. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl. 1966. Philosophy of Natural Science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hernson, Paul S. 1995. “Replication, Verification, Secondary Analysis, and Data Collection in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28(September): 452–55.Google Scholar
Hollis, Martin. 1994. The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Richard T., and Richardson, John M. Jr. 1970. “Competing Paradigms in Comparative Politics.” In The Methodology of Comparative Research, ed. Holt, Richard T. and Turner, John E. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1995. “Replication, Replication.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28(September): 444–52.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas E. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Rev. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laitin, David D. 1996. “Forum on the Question, ‘Is Comparative Politics Obsolete?’ Field Work in the Era of Globalization.” APSA-CP: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics 7(Summer): 4, 10.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, Mark I., ed. 1997. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review 65(March): 682–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustick, Ian S. 1996. “Read My Footnotes.” APSA-CP: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics 7(Winter): 6, 10.Google Scholar
Macridis, Roy C. 1955. The Study of Comparative Government. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Maisel, L. Sandy. 1995. “On the Inadequacy and Inappropriateness of the Replication Standard.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28(September): 467–70.Google Scholar
Mayer, Lawrence C. 1983. “Practicing What We Preach: Comparative Politics in the 1980s.” Comparative Political Studies 16(January): 173–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Lawrence C. 1989. Redefining Comparative Politics: Promise Versus Performance. Beverly Hills: Sage Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J. 1995. “Replication: A View from the Streets.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28(September): 456–59.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1977. “The Future of a Science of Politics.” American Behavioral Scientist 21(September/October): 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, and Gadbois, George H. 1983. “Contemporary Comparative Politics: An Inventory and Assessment.” Comparative Political Studies 16(October): 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur. 1968. Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney. 1967. “Some Dilemmas in Comparative Research.” World Politics 20(June): 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney. 1985. “Comparative Politics: Where Have We Been, Where Are We Going?” In New Directions in Comparative Politics, ed. Wiarda, Howard J. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Wiarda, Howard J. 1985. “Comparative Politics Past and Present.” In, New Directions in Comparative Politics, ed. Wiarda, Howard J. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science and its Relations to Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar