We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Footnotes
An expanded version of this article will appear in William G. Mayer,
ed., The Making of the Presidential Candidates 2004
(New York: Chatham House, 2003).
References
AllenMike2002With Adoption Push, Bush Adopts a Clinton
TacticWashington Post24JulyGoogle Scholar
AtkesonLonna Rae2000From the Primaries to the General Election: Does a Divisive
Nomination Race Affect a Candidate's Fortune for the Fall?In Pursuit of the White House 2000William G.MayerNew YorkChatham HouseGoogle Scholar
BracePaulHinckleyBarbara1992Follow the LeaderNew YorkBasic BooksGoogle Scholar
CohenRichard E.1979What to Expect from Carter's New CabinetNational Journal28July124Google Scholar
DevroyAnn1992New Hampshire Awaits Latest Edition of
Candidate BushWashington Post15JanuaryGoogle Scholar
DickinsonMatthew J.TenpasKathryn Dunn2002Explaining Increasing Turnover Rates among
Presidential Advisers, 1929–1997Journal of Politics64434-48Google Scholar
HagenMichael G.MayerWilliam G.2000The Modern Politics of Presidential Selection: How Changing the
Rules Really Did Change the GameIn Pursuit of the White House 2000William G.MayerNew YorkChatham HouseGoogle Scholar