Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:57:58.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inclusive Assessment of Class Participation: Students’ Takeaways as a One-Minute Paper

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2021

Luba Levin-Banchik Open the ORCID record for Luba Levin-Banchik [Opens in a new window]
Luba Levin-Banchik*
Affiliation:
California State University, San Bernardino
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Building on the concept of a one-minute paper, I suggest students’ takeaways as a simple technique for inclusive assessment of participation in a classroom. Acknowledging cultural and language barriers, the takeaways technique allows an instructor to grade participation not by observing the frequency of spoken comments but instead by the quality of written comments in students’ one-point takeaway memos completed at the end of each class. In this way, all students have an equal chance to be appraised for their participation, indicated by being attentive in class. This article surveys the scholarship on one-minute papers and participation grading in political science, outlines takeaway procedures, and discusses how to adjust this technique for face-to-face and online learning environments. I suggest that takeaways ensure transparency in grading participation, enable equal opportunities to participate, encourage students’ attentiveness, and create a communication channel for the exchange of immediate feedback between a professor and students.

Type
Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 171 - 175
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angelo, Thomas A., and Cross, K. Patricia. 1993. Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bean, John C., and Peterson, Dean. 1998. “Grading Classroom Participation.” New Directions for Teaching & Learning 1998 (74): 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belloni, Roberto. 2008. “Role-Playing International Intervention in Conflict Areas: Lessons from Bosnia for Northern Ireland Education.” International Studies Perspectives 9 (2): 220–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackstone, Bethany, and Oldmixon, Elizabeth. 2019. “Specifications Grading in Political Science.” Journal of Political Science Education 15 (2): 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Dan. 2011. “The ‘False Choice’ of Liberal Democracy: Participatory Assessment in the International Relations Classroom.” International Studies Perspectives 12 (3): 294–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chizmar, John F., and Ostrosky, Anthony L.. 1998. “The One-Minute Paper: Some Empirical Findings.” Journal of Economic Education 29 (1): 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiou, Chei-Chang, Wang, Yu-Min, and Lee, Li-Tze. 2014. “Reducing Statistics Anxiety and Enhancing Statistics Learning Achievement: Effectiveness of a One-Minute Strategy.” Psychological Reports 115 (1): 297–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, Brady, and Nyenhuis, Robert. 2020. “The Effectiveness of Concept Maps for Students’ Learning and Retention.” Journal of Political Science Education June:1–13.Google Scholar
Fowler, Kelsie, Windschitl, Mark, and Richards, Jennifer. 2019. “Exit Tickets: Understanding Students, Adapting Instruction, and Addressing Equity.” Science Teacher 86 (8): 18–26.Google Scholar
Hamann, Kerstin, Pollock, Philip H., and Wilson, Bruce M.. 2012. “Assessing Student Perceptions of the Benefits of Discussions in Small-Group, Large-Class, and Online Learning Contexts.” College Teaching 60 (2): 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Adam C., Wilson, Joshua, and Roscoe, Rod D.. 2017. “College Student Perceptions of Writing Errors, Text Quality, and Author Characteristics.” Assessing Writing 34:72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kille, Kent J., Krain, Matthew, and Lantis, Jeffrey S.. 2008. “Active Learning across Borders: Lessons from an Interactive Workshop in Brazil.” International Studies Perspectives 9 (4): 411–29.10.1111/j.1528-3585.2008.00345.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korniienko, Alina Yu. 2020. “The Use of Debates as an Approach to Deliver the Course Entitled ‘The Impact of US Policy on Integration Processes in Europe in the Post-Bipolar Era.’” International Journal of Higher Education 9 (2): 321–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, S. Rebecca. 2012. “The Classroom Is Alive with the Sound of Thinking: The Power of the Exit Slip.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 24 (2): 189–96.Google Scholar
Levin-Banchik, Luba. 2018. “Assessing Knowledge Retention, with and without Simulations.” Journal of Political Science Education 14 (3): 341–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusk, Adam. 2016. “Metacognitive Strategies in the Introduction to Political Science Classroom.” Journal of Political Science Education 12 (2): 141–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matto, Elizabeth C., and Chmielewski, Randi. 2020. “Talking Politics: Creating a Course for Incoming Freshman on Political Discourse.” Journal of Political Science Education September:1–11.Google Scholar
McMillan, Samuel Lucas. 2014. “Bravo for Brevity: Using Short Paper Assignments in International Relations Classes.” International Studies Perspectives 15 (1): 109–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulcare, Daniel M., and Shwedel, Allan. 2017. “Transforming Bloom’s Taxonomy into Classroom Practice: A Practical Yet Comprehensive Approach to Promote Critical Reading and Student Participation.” Journal of Political Science Education 13 (2): 121–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, Paul, and Rom, Mark. 2015. “Fair and Balanced? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Bias in Grading.” American Politics Research 43 (3): 536–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oros, Andrew L. 2007. “Let’s Debate: Active Learning Encourages Student Participation and Critical Thinking.” Journal of Political Science Education 3 (3): 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, John C. 2005. “Instant Assessment: Using One-Minute Papers in Lower-Level Classes.” Pedagogy 5 (1): 108–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pernecky, Mark. 1993. “Reaction Papers Enrich Economics Discussions.” College Teaching 41 (3): 89–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocca, Kelly A. 2010. “Student Participation in the College Classroom: An Extended Multidisciplinary Literature Review.” Communication Education 59 (2): 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roever, Sally, and Manna, Paul. 2005. “Could You Explain My Grade? The Pedagogical and Administrative Virtues of Grading Sheets.” PS: Political Science & Politics 38 (2): 317–20.Google Scholar
Rom, Mark Carl, and Musgrave, Paul. 2014. “Political Outcome Bias in Grading: Identifying Problems and Suggesting Solutions.” Journal of Political Science Education 10 (2): 136–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stead, David R. 2005. “A Review of the One-Minute Paper.” Active Learning in Higher Education 6 (2): 118–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, John Wesley. 2011. “Resistance to Classroom Participation: Minority Students, Academic Discourse, Cultural Conflicts, and Issues of Representation in Whole Class Discussions.” Journal of Language, Identity & Education 10 (4): 250–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaylacı, Şule, and Beauvais, Edana. 2017. “The Role of Social Group Membership on Classroom Participation.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (2): 559–64.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Levin-Banchik et al. supplementary material

Appendices 1-3

Download Levin-Banchik et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 216.3 KB