Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:08:22.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Great Equalizer? Gender, Parenting, and Scholarly Productivity During the Global Pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2021

Marijke Breuning Open the ORCID record for Marijke Breuning [Opens in a new window] ,
Christina Fattore Open the ORCID record for Christina Fattore [Opens in a new window] ,
Jennifer Ramos  and
Jamie Scalera
Marijke Breuning
Affiliation:
University of North Texas
Christina Fattore
Affiliation:
West Virginia University
Jennifer Ramos
Affiliation:
Loyola Marymount University
Jamie Scalera
Affiliation:
Georgia Southern University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Has the global COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted the scholarly productivity of academics? Do gender and parenting magnify its effect? To obtain insight into the changes the pandemic has wrought in the lives and careers of women and parents in academia, we surveyed scholars in political science and international studies. The survey was in the field during the period in which many academics were experiencing shelter-at-home orders and adjusting to a new reality. It captures initial reactions to changed circumstances as well as the fears and anticipated consequences of the disruptions. We find that perceptions of a negative impact are broadly shared. The open-ended responses suggest that the pandemic may widen the gender and parent productivity gaps. Although further analysis is needed to better understand the effect of the pandemic on scholarly productivity, we conclude that the pandemic exacerbates existing structural inequalities.

Type
Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 427 - 431
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Political Science Association. 2020. “Data on the Profession.” Washington, DC: American Political Science Association. www.apsanet.org/RESOURCES/Data-on-the-Profession/Dashboards/P-WAM.Google Scholar
Breuning, Marijke, Fattore, Christina, Ramos, Jennifer, and Scalera, Jamie. 2020. “Replication Data for: The Great Equalizer? Gender, Parenting, and Scholarly Productivity during the Global Pandemic.” https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/A8QDOX, Harvard Dataverse, V1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fattore, Christina. 2018. “Nevertheless, She Persisted: Women’s Experiences and Perceptions within the International Studies Association.” International Studies Perspectives 20 (1): 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaherty, Colleen. 2020. “No Room of One’s Own: Early Journal Submission Data Suggest COVID-19 Is Tanking Women’s Research Productivity.” Inside Higher Ed, April 21. www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/04/21/early-journal-submission-data-suggest-covid-19-tanking-womens-research-productivity.Google Scholar
Hancock, Kathleen, Baum, Matthew, and Breuning, Marijke. 2013. “Women and Pre-Tenure Scholarly Productivity in International Studies: An Investigation into the Leaky Career Pipeline.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (4): 507–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitchener, Caroline. 2020. “Women Academics Seem to Be Submitting Fewer Papers During Coronavirus. ‘Never Seen Anything Like It,’ Says One Editor.” The Lily, April 24. www.thelily.com/women-academics-seem-to-be-submitting-fewer-papers-during-coronavirus-never-seen-anything-like-it-says-one-editor.Google Scholar
Malisch, Jessica L., Harris, Breanna N., Sherrer, Shanen M., Lewis, Kristy A., Shepherd, Stephanie L., McCarthy, Pumtiwitt C., Spott, Jessica L., et al. 2020. “In the Wake of COVID-19, Academia Needs New Solutions to Ensure Gender Equity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (27): 15378–81. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.2010636117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, David. 2020. “Pandemic Lockdown Holding Back Female Academics, Data Show.” Times Higher Education, June 25. www.timeshighereducation.com/news/pandemic-lockdown-holding-back-female-academics-data-show.Google Scholar
Miller, Claire Cain. 2020. “Nearly Half of Men Say They Do Most of the Home Schooling. 3 Percent of Women Agree.” New York Times, May 6. www.nytimes.com/2020/05/06/upshot/pandemic-chores-homeschooling-gender.html.Google Scholar
Minello, Alessandra. 2020. “The Pandemic and the Female Academic.” Nature, April 17. www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01135-9.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. 2019. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Doctorate Recipients from US Universities: 2018. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSF 20-301). https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf20301/data-tables.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa, and Gilmartin, Shannon K.. 2010. “Housework Is an Academic Issue: How to Keep Talented Women Scientists in the Lab, Where They Belong.” Academe 96 (1): 39–44. www.aaup.org/article/housework-academic-issue#.XuhBned7k2w.Google Scholar
Stack, Steven. 2004. “Gender, Children, and Research Productivity.” Research in Higher Education 45 (8): 891–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viglione, Giuliana. 2020. “Are Women Publishing Less During the Pandemic? Here’s What the Data Say.” Nature 581:365–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Windsor, Leah C., and Crawford, Kerry F.. 2020a. “Snow Days, Holidays, and Pandemic Quarantines: Why We Need to Be Looking after Parents.” Medium, March 23. https://medium.com/international-affairs-blog/snow-days-holidays-and-pandemic-quarantines-why-we-need-to-be-looking-after-parents-a3dc38413548.Google Scholar
Windsor, Leah C., and Crawford, Kerry F.. 2020b. “Best Practices for Normalizing Parents in the Academy: Higher- and Lower-Order Processes and Women and Parents’ Success.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (2): 275–80.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Breuning et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/A8QDOX
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Breuning et al. supplementary material

Appendix A

Download Breuning et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 204 KB