Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:05:54.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diversity and Inequality Track Summary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2006

Amy Cabrera Rasmussen
Affiliation:
Chapman University
Reilly Hirst
Affiliation:
Portland State University
Anas Malik
Affiliation:
Xavier University
Ange-Marie Hancock
Affiliation:
Yale University

Extract

During the Cold War, whistle-blowers and dissenters were threatened and penalized; they lost jobs, faced social and governmental harassment, and often lived thankless and persecuted lives. It was never entirely clear where the speech boundaries lay, or when one might get sanctioned. Today, the “War on Terror” is becoming a hegemonic framework, the Patriot Act has been made permanent, and there are ongoing revelations about increased surveillance in the United States. Along with these developments, there are increasing efforts to punish academics for expressing contentious views. At a minimum, teaching topics that disrupt the comfort zone can be emotionally draining and may produce some negative reactions in the classroom. Under such pressures, self-censorship can be a natural consequence. Yet open democratic deliberation, well-rounded education, and intellectual freedom are prerequisites for best serving our world.

Type
2006 APSA TEACHING AND LEARNING CONFERENCE TRACK SUMMARIES
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)