Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:44:15.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beating the House: How Inadequate Penalties for Cheating Make Plagiarism an Excellent Gamble

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2004

Matthew C. Woessner
Matthew C. Woessner
Affiliation:
Penn State, Harrisburg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Teacher
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 313 - 320
Copyright
© 2004 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buchanan James M., and Gordon Tullock. 1965 The Calculus of Consent, Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Fishburn Peter C. 1982 The Foundations of Expected Utility. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Friedman Hershey H. 2001 “The Impact of Jewish Values on Marketing and Business Practices.” Journal of Macromarketing 21 (June): 74– 80.Google Scholar
Friedman Hershey H. 2003 “Creating a Company Code of Ethics: Using the Bible as a Guide.” Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 8 (1).Google Scholar
Gollier Christian. 2001 The Economics of Risk and Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hacking Ian. 2001 An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley Stanley,Jr. 1996 “The Promise and Limitations of Rational Choice Theory.” In The Rational Choice Controversy, ed. Jeffrey Friedman. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCabe Donald L, and Linda Klebe Trevino. “Academic Dishonesty: Honor Code and Other Contextual Influences.” Journal of Higher Education 64 (5): 522– 538.Google Scholar
McCabe Donald L., L. K. Treveno, and K. D. Butterfield. 2001 “Cheating in Academic Institution: A Decade of Research.” Ethics & Behavior 11 (3): 219– 232.Google Scholar
Michaels James W., and Terance D. Miethe. 1989 “Applying Theories of Deviance to Academic Cheating.” Social Science Quarterly 70 (4): 870– 885.Google Scholar
Piliavin Irving, Rosemary Gartner, Craig Thornton, and Ross L. Matsueda. 1986 “Crime, Deterrence, and Rational Choice.” American Sociological Review 51 (1): 101– 119.Google Scholar
Quiggin John. 1993 Generalized Expected Utiilty Theory: The Rank-Dependant Model. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
Zimring Franklin E, and G. J. Hawkings. 1973 Deterrence: The Legal Threat in Crime Control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar