Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:49:39.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further Discoveries of Flint Implements in the Brown Boulder Clay of North-West Norfolk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2013

J. Reid Moir
Get access

Extract

Since my original paper on the flint implements found in the Brown Boulder Clay of north-west Norfolk, I have continued my researches in that region, and now wish to give some account of these, and of the further specimens which have been discovered in this most recent boulder clay of East Anglia. I would take this opportunity of thanking the Trustees of the Percy Sladen Fund for their kindness in supporting this research with a money grant, and so enabling me to continue my examination of an era of much interest and importance to prehistoric archæology. I am also very grateful to my friends, Mr. J. B. Calkin, Mr. Guy Maynard, and Mr. J. S. Fisher, for the valuable help they have given me in carrying out the investigation of the Brown Boulder Clay.

As is now widely known, this deposit, so far as Norfolk is concerned, is confined to the north-western portion of that county, and many years ago was examined and reported upon by the Geological Survey in two of their memoırs. The Brown Boulder Clay occurs approximately at sea-level at Hunstanton, while at Brancaster, as reported by Mr. Clement Reid, the deposit is exposed at low water upon the foreshore, underlying the ‘submerged forest’ which he saw there. At other places, such as Holkham brickfield, and the remarkable formation (probably a terminal moraine) in Hunstanton Park, the boulder clay rests at about 50 ft, above O.D.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , 1932 , pp. 306 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 306 note 1 Antiquaries Journal, Vol. x., October, 1930, No. 4, pp. 359–371 Google Scholar.

page 306 note 2 ‘The Geology of the Borders of the Wash’ (1899), and ‘The Geology of the Country around Fakenham, Wells, and Holt’ (1884).

page 306 note 3 Survey Memoir, ‘The Geology of the Borders of the Wash.’

page 307 note 1 Transactions of the Leicester Literary and Philosophical Society.

page 307 note 2 Antiquaries Journal, October, 1930, pp. 359–371 Google Scholar.

page 310 note 1 Proceedings, P.S.E.A., Vol. vi., pt. 3, pp. 182–221 Google Scholar.

page 310 note 2 This term was I believe, first used by Skertchly.

page 310 note 3 Proc., P.S.E.A., Vol. ii., pt. 1, pp. 80–98 Google Scholar.

page 311 note 1 Journ. Roy. Anthro. Inst., Vol. lx., July-December, 1930, pp. 485–499 Google Scholar.

page 313 note 1 Antiquaries Journal, 1930, Vol. x., No. 4, pp. 371–383 Google Scholar; 1931. Vol. xi., No. 3 pp. 262-272; Proc. P.S.E.A., 1930, Vol. vi., pt. 3, pp. 226–233 Google Scholar.

page 313 note 2 Journ. Roy. Anthro. Inst., Vol. xlvii., 1917, pp. 367–412 Google Scholar. and other papers.