Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:38:05.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of nutrition on reproduction in laboratory rodents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

Annie M. Brown ,
Margaret J. Cook ,
W. Lane-Petter ,
G. Porter  and
A. A. Tuffery
Annie M. Brown
Affiliation:
Laboratory Animals Centre, M.R.C. Laboratories, Woodmansterne Road, Carshalton, Surrey
Margaret J. Cook
Affiliation:
Laboratory Animals Centre, M.R.C. Laboratories, Woodmansterne Road, Carshalton, Surrey
W. Lane-Petter
Affiliation:
Laboratory Animals Centre, M.R.C. Laboratories, Woodmansterne Road, Carshalton, Surrey
G. Porter
Affiliation:
Laboratory Animals Centre, M.R.C. Laboratories, Woodmansterne Road, Carshalton, Surrey
A. A. Tuffery
Affiliation:
Laboratory Animals Centre, M.R.C. Laboratories, Woodmansterne Road, Carshalton, Surrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Nutrition and Reproduction
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 1960 , pp. 32 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1960

References

REFERENCES

Ball, Z. B., Barnes, R. H. & Visscher, M. B. (1947). Amer. J. Physiol. 150, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, H. M. (1950 a). Tech. Note Lab. Anim. Bur. no. 9.Google Scholar
Bruce, H. M. (1950 b). J. Hyg., Camb., 48, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, H. M. & Parkes, A. S. (1945–1946). J. Hyg., Camb., 44, 501.Google Scholar
Bruce, H. M. & Parkes, A. S. (1949). J. Hyg., Camb., 47, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, H. M. & Parkes, A. S. (1956). J. Anim. Tech. Ass. 7, 54.Google Scholar
Carr, C. J., King, J. T. & Visscher, M. B. (1949). Fed. Proc. 8, 22.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, W. F. J. (1957). Coll. Pap. Lab. Anim. Bur. 5, 27.Google Scholar
Goettsch, M. (1948). Arch. Biochem. 19, 349.Google Scholar
Goettsch, M. (1949). Arch. Biochem. 21, 289.Google Scholar
Howie, J. W. (1951). J. Anim. Tech. Ass. 2, 6.Google Scholar
De Meillon, B. & Paterson, S. (1958). S. Afr. med. J. 32, 1086.Google Scholar
Orr, J. B. & Richards, M. B. (1934). Biochem. J. 28, 1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, A. S. (1945–1946). J. Hyg., Camb., 44, 491.Google Scholar
Parkinson, G. B. (1956). Consol. Bull. Lab. Anam. Bur. 1, 65.Google Scholar
Paterson, J. S. (1957). UFAW Handb., 2nd ed. p. 203.Google Scholar
Reid, M. E. (1958). The Guinea Pig in Research. Washington, D.C.: Human Factors Research Bureau Inc.Google Scholar
Russell, F. C. (1948). Tech. Commun. Bur. Anim. Nutr., Aberd., no. 16.Google Scholar
Sandford, J. C., King-Wilson, W. & Muir, R. O. (1957). UFAW Handb., 2nd ed. p. 411.Google Scholar
Shano, I. I. (1957). Zool. Z. 36, 1084–1092, (Predagog. Inst., Vorosilovgrad).Google Scholar
Sherman, H. C., Campbell, H. L. & Ragan, M. S. (1949). J. Nutr. 37, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, D. J. & Gammage, L. (1959). J. Anim. Tech. Ass. 9, 62.Google Scholar
Thomson, W. (1936). J. Hyg., Camb., 36, 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, D. E. & Gordon, J. G. (1953). Brit. J. Nutr. 7, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, G. G. (1957). Coll. Pap. Lab. Anim. Bur. 5, 21.Google Scholar