Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:46:27.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Healthy eating guidelines: Can it be more palatable and convenient for consumers?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2017

S.N. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, Ireland
E. Bolanos
Affiliation:
Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, Ireland
M.B. McCarthy
Affiliation:
HRB Centre for Diet & Health, Cork University Business School, University College Cork, Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2017 

Approximately 200 different food decisions are made in any one day verifying that eating, drinking and food choices are among the most frequent of daily human behaviours( Reference Wansink and Sobal 1 ). In order to understand or try to influence food choice decisions and behaviours, the attitudes and motivations underpinning this behaviour must be explored and understood( Reference Roininen and Tuorila 2 , Reference Zandstra, De Graaf and Van Staveren 3 ). Although dietary guidelines are evidence based, targeted and culturally appropriate; they fail to account for the impact of differing attitudes and motivations on food choice behaviour.

The aim of this research is to determine the impact of food choice attitudes and motivations on dietary behaviour and to demonstrate how this evidence can be used to enhance the targeting of dietary guidelines for health eating.

The National Adult Nutrition Survey collected data on the food and beverage consumption of 1500 Irish adults and alongside anthropometric measurements, socio-demographic and lifestyle data, physical activity. Food choice attitudes and motivations were measured by a questionnaire using a range previously validated constructs.

Analysis of the food choice motives showed that taste was the most important food choice motive for consumers followed by health and nutrition. As shown in the Table, those who rank taste and other motivations such as cost and convenient high have different dietary intakes compared to those who rank health and nutrition higher. Energy and percentage energy from fat is higher, and fruit and vegetable consumption is lower for those who rank taste as their primary motivation in food choice. A lower BMI and high fruit and veg intake was associated with higher nutrition ranking and lower cost ranking. Health as a primary motivation was associated with a lower BMI and higher fruit and vegetable consumption. Convenience motivation was associated with lower fruit and vegetable intakes.

Values are means across low vs high rankings of motives. Significance determined using t-test. ns non significant; ab significant difference between 1st/2nd and 3rd ranking of motive at P < 0·05. EI = Energy Intake; BMI = body mass index.

Hence dietary guidelines that are promoted on the basis of healthy eating alone will only appeal to a certain proportion of the population who are motived by health and nutrition. Guidelines should account for taste and cost drivers of food choice and promote the sensory aspects of healthy food choice and not solely health.

References

1. Wansink, B & Sobal, J (2007) Environment and Behavior, 39, 106123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Roininen, K, & Tuorila, H. (1999) Food Quality and Preference, 10, 357365.Google Scholar
3. Zandstra, EH, De Graaf, C, & Van Staveren, WA (2001) Food Quality and Preference, 12, 7582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar