Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T22:41:39.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterising dietary protein intake in Irish adults on the island of Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2024

H. Griffin
Affiliation:
Queens University Belfast, School of Biological Sciences, Belfast, Northern Ireland
A.P Nugent
Affiliation:
Queens University Belfast, School of Biological Sciences, Belfast, Northern Ireland
B. A McNulty
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, Dublin, Ireland
D. Wright
Affiliation:
Queens University Belfast, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, Northern Ireland
L. Brennan
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, Dublin, Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Shifting dietary protein intakes from animal to plant-based sources is suggested as a path to sustain the world’s food consumption and maintain planetary resources (1). However, to facilitate change, it is important to characterise baseline dietary protein patterns. This study aimed to examine dietary protein intakes on the island of Ireland in order to determine population characteristics and food sources influencing protein intake.

Analyses were performed on the Northern Ireland sub cohort of the UK National Dietary Nutrition Survey (NDNS 2016-2019) (2) and the Irish National Adult Nutrition Survey (2008-2010) (3). Both surveys used a four-day food diary and a final sample of 1484 adults, aged 18-64 years was extracted (NANS; n =1274 and NI NDNS; n=210). Mean daily intakes for protein (MDI; % total energy, TE) for the total population were calculated and the population was divided into three tertile groups based on low, medium and high protein intake (%TE). Differences in population characteristics, energy MDI, key nutrients (%TE or per 10MJ) and contributing food sources were examined across these tertiles, using chi-square and one-way ANOVA with covariates (age and BMI) and correcting for multiple comparisons as appropriate (P<0.005).

Overall, 17.1% of TE was obtained from protein and 77% of participants met their protein DRV based on EFSA recommendations of 0.83g/kg/body weight (4). The difference in protein intakes between the highest and lowest tertiles was 7.8% TE (21.2 % TE vs 13.4% TE) with high protein consumers reporting lower energy intakes (1734 ±564kcal) compared to low consumers (2185± 661 kcal). High protein consumers were older (42.5 ± 12.8 years) and had a higher BMI (27.7 ± 6.0 kg/m2). They also had higher MDI of dietary fibre, calcium, zinc, sodium, iron, folate and vitamins A, C, D and B12 (per 10MJ) (p<0.001) and lower MDI of carbohydrates, fat, saturated fat (%TE) in comparison to low consumers (p<0.001). The % contribution of ‘chicken, turkey and dishes’ (18.3%), ‘beef, veal and dishes’ (12.8%) and ‘fish and fish products (7.0%) to protein intakes were significantly higher in the high versus the low consumption group (10%, 7.4%, 4.4% TE respectively; P<0.001). In contrast, those in the lowest protein intake group had a significantly higher intakes of protein coming from dietary sources including ‘burgers, sausages and meat products (9.9 vs 5.9%), ‘white bread and rolls’ (6.9 vs 3.9%), ‘potatoes (including chips)’ (4.1 vs 2.9 %) and ‘cakes, pastries, buns and fruit pies’ (1.7 vs 0.8%) compared to high consumers.

In general, animal protein sources contributed more to total daily protein intakes than plant sources, however, the pattern of protein foods differed according to level of protein intake. These findings will aid in the development of strategies to diversify protein intakes on the Island of Ireland.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B et al. (2019) The Lancet 393(10170), 447–492.Google Scholar
Public Health England (2020). NDNS: results from years 9 to 11 (2016 to 2017 and 2018 to 2019) [Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/ndns-results-from-years-9-to-11-2016-to-2017-and-2018-to-2019.]Google Scholar
Irish Universities Nutrition Alliance (2011) The National Adult Nutrition Survey. [Available at: http://www.iuna.net/]Google Scholar
EFSA (2012) EFSA Journal 10(2), 2557.Google Scholar