Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:25:40.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultra fast outflows, and their connection to accretion and ejection processes in AGNs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2020

Anna Lia Longinotti
Anna Lia Longinotti*
Affiliation:
CONACyT–Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica Luis E. Erro 1, Sta María Tonantzintla, Puebla, C.P. 72840, Mexico email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The growing evidence for energy-conserving outflows in powerful and luminous AGN supports the idea that high-velocity winds launched from the accretion disc evolve systematically after undergoing a shock with the ambient medium and that they are capable to expel enough mass and energy so as to produce feedback. This talk will give an overview of recent results on AGN ultra fast outflows, with focus on grating X-ray spectra of bright sources. I will review how UFO work, their observational properties and their relation with AGN outflows in other bands, what is their impact on the host galaxies and their role in feedback processes.

Keywords

galaxies: activehydrodynamicsatomic processes
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 14 , Symposium S342: Perseus in Sicily: From Black Hole to Cluster Outskirts , May 2018 , pp. 90 - 96
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Chartas, G., Brandt, W. N., Gallagher, S. C., & Garmire, G. P. 2002, ApJ, 579, 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartas, G., Saez, C., Brandt, W. N., Giustini, M., & Garmire, G. P. 2009, ApJ, 706, 644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicone, C., Maiolino, R., Sturm, E., et al. 2014, A&A, 562, A21Google Scholar
Di Matteo, T., Springel, V., & Hernquist, L. 2005, Nature, 433, 604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esquivel, A., & Raga, A. C. 2013, ApJ, 779, 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., & Quataert, E. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feruglio, C., Maiolino, R., Piconcelli, E., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L155Google Scholar
Feruglio, C., Fiore, F., Carniani, S., et al. 2015, A&A, 583, A99Google Scholar
Fukumura, K., Tombesi, F., Kazanas, D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 805, 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo, L. C. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giroletti, M., Panessa, F., Longinotti, A. L., et al. 2017, A&A, 600, A87Google Scholar
Gofford, J., Reeves, J. N., Tombesi, F., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, A., Mathur, S., Krongold, Y., & Nicastro, F. 2013, ApJ, 772, 66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, P. F., & Elvis, M. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, D. H., Jáuregui Correa, J.-C., Schloerb, F. P., et al. 2010, Proceeding of SPIE, 7733, 773312Google Scholar
King, A. R. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A., & Pounds, K. 2015, ARAA, 53, 115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komossa, S., & Xu, D. 2007, ApJL, 667, L33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krongold, Y., Nicastro, F., Elvis, M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanzuisi, G., Giustini, M., Cappi, M., et al. 2012, A&A, 544, A2Google Scholar
Longinotti, A. L., Krongold, Y., Guainazzi, M., et al. 2015, ApJL, 813, L39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matzeu, G. A., Reeves, J. N., Braito, V., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, L15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nims, J., Quataert, E., & Faucher-Giguère, C.-A. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 3612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardini, E., Reeves, J. N., Gofford, J., et al. 2015, Science, 347, 860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, M. L., Pinto, C., Fabian, A. C., et al. 2017, Nature, 543, 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, C., Alston, W., Parker, M. L., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pounds, K. A., Reeves, J. N., King, A. R., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pounds, K. A., & Vaughan, S. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pounds, K. A. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 3221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proga, D., & Kallman, T. R. 2004, ApJ, 616, 688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, J. N., Braito, V., Nardini, E., et al. 2016, ApJ, 824, 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sim, S. A., Proga, D., Miller, L., Long, K. S., & Turner, T. J. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, P. M., Downes, D., Radford, S. J. E., & Barrett, J. W. 1997, ApJ, 478, 144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tombesi, F., Cappi, M., Reeves, J. N., et al. 2010, A&A, 521, A57Google Scholar
Tombesi, F., Cappi, M., Reeves, J. N., & Braito, V. 2012, MNRAS, 422, L1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tombesi, F., Melendez, M., Veilleux, S., et al. 2015, Nature, 519, 436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velazquez, P. F., Gomez, D. O., Dubner, G. M., de Castro, G. G., & Costa, A. 1998, A&A, 334, 1060Google Scholar
Zakamska, N. L., & Greene, J. E. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zubovas, K., & King, A. 2012, ApJL, 745, L34CrossRefGoogle Scholar