Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:05:50.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new generation of solar dynamo model and its application to explore the stellar magnetic cycle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2024

Zebin Zhang*
Affiliation:
School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing, China Key Laboratory of Space Environment Monitoring and Information Processing of MIIT, Beijing, China
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In most of the Babcock–Leighton (BL) type solar dynamo models, the toroidal magnetic field is assumed to be generated in the tachocline. However, magnetic activity of fully convective stars and MHD simulations of global stellar convection have recently raised serious doubts about the importance of the tachocline in the generation of the toroidal field. We have developed a BL-type dynamo model operating in the bulk of the convection zone, and are extending this model to solar-type stars. In this study, we aim at exploring how the starspot properties affect the stellar magnetic cycle. Observations show that faster rotating stars tend to have stronger magnetic activity and shorter magnetic cycles. By considering the higher latitudes and larger tilt angles of starspots for faster rotators, our simulations reproduce observations that faster rotating stars have shorter magnetic cycle and stronger activity.

Type
Contributed Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Jiang, J. 2020, Nonlinear Mechanisms that Regulate the Solar Cycle Amplitude. Astrophys. J., 900(1), 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, J., Cameron, R. H., Schmitt, D., & Schüssler, M. 2011, The solar magnetic field since 1700. I. Characteristics of sunspot group emergence and reconstruction of the butterfly diagram. Astron. Astrophys., 528, A82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitchatinov, L. & Nepomnyashchikh, A. 2017,a How supercritical are stellar dynamos, or why do old main-sequence dwarfs not obey gyrochronology? Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 470a(3), 31243130.Google Scholar
Kitchatinov, L. L. & Nepomnyashchikh, A. A. 2017,b A joined model for solar dynamo and differential rotation. Astronomy Letters, 43b(5), 332343.Google Scholar
Nelson, N. J., Brown, B. P., Brun, A. S., Miesch, M. S., & Toomre, J. 2013, Magnetic Wreaths and Cycles in Convective Dynamos. Astrophys. J., 762(2), 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuessler, M., Caligari, P., Ferriz–Mas, A., Solanki, S. K., & Stix, M. 1996, Distribution of starspots on cool stars. I. Young and main sequence stars of 1Msun-. Astron. Astrophys., 314, 503512.Google Scholar
Strassmeier, K. G. 2009, Starspots. Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 17(3), 251308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, S. S. & Penrod, G. D. 1983, Doppler imaging of spotted stars : application to the RS Canum Venaticorum star HR 1099. Pub. Astron. Soc. Pac., 95, 565576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, O. C. 1978, Chromospheric variations in main-sequence stars. Astrophys. J., 226, 379396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, N. J. & Drake, J. J. 2016, Solar-type dynamo behaviour in fully convective stars without a tachocline. Nature, 535(7613), 526528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Z. & Jiang, J. 2022, A Babcock–Leighton-type Solar Dynamo Operating in the Bulk of the Convection Zone. Astrophys. J., 930(1), 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Jiang, J., & Kitchatinov, L. L. 2024, Modeling effects of starspots on stellar magnetic cycles. Astron. Astrophys., under review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Jiang, J., & Zhang, H. 2022, A Potential New Mechanism for the Butterfly Diagram of the Solar Cycle: Latitude-dependent Radial Flux Transport. Astrophys. J. Lett., 941(1), L3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar