Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T11:53:36.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolution of binary stars and its implications for evolutionary population synthesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Z. Han
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories/Yunnan Observatory, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650011, China (email: [email protected])
X. Chen
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories/Yunnan Observatory, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650011, China (email: [email protected])
F. Zhang
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories/Yunnan Observatory, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650011, China (email: [email protected])
Ph. Podsiadlowski
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Department of Astrophysics, Keble Road, Oxford, OX1 3RH, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Most stars are members of binaries, and the evolution of a star in a close binary system differs from that of an ioslated star due to the proximity of its companion star. The components in a binary system interact in many ways and binary evolution leads to the formation of many peculiar stars, including blue stragglers and hot subdwarfs. We will discuss binary evolution and the formation of blue stragglers and hot subdwarfs, and show that those hot objects are important in the study of evolutionary population synthesis (EPS), and conclude that binary interactions should be included in the study of EPS. Indeed, binary interactions make a stellar population younger (hotter), and the far-ultraviolet (UV) excess in elliptical galaxies is shown to be most likely resulted from binary interactions. This has major implications for understanding the evolution of the far-UV excess and elliptical galaxies in general. In particular, it implies that the far-UV excess is not a sign of age, as had been postulated prviously and predicts that it should not be strongly dependent on the metallicity of the population, but exists universally from dwarf ellipticals to giant ellipticals.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Atlee, D. W., Assef, R. J., & Kochanek, C. S. 2009, ApJ, 694, 1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. M. et al. , 2003, ApJ, 584, L69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. & Han, Z. 2008a, MNRAS, 384, 1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. & Han, Z. 2008b, MNRAS, 387, 1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. & Han, Z. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 1822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Z., Podsiadlowski, Ph., Maxted, P. F. L., Marsh, T. R., & Ivanova, N. 2002, MNRAS, 336, 449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Z., Podsiadlowski, Ph., Maxted, P. F. L., & Marsh, T. R. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Z., Podsiadlowski, Ph., & Lynas-Gray, A. E. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Z. 2008, A&A, 484, L31Google Scholar
Lee, Y. W. 1994, ApJ, 430, L113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, T. & Han, Z. 2008, ApJ, 680, 1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, S.K., Demarque, P., & Kim, Y. C. 1997, ApJ, 482, 677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, F., Han, Z., Li, L., & Hurley, J. R. 2004, A&A, 415, 117Google Scholar