Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:41:29.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparing six evolutionary population synthesis models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Y. C. Liang
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, A 20 Datun Road Chaoyang District, Beijing 100012, China; email: [email protected]
X. Y. Chen
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, A 20 Datun Road Chaoyang District, Beijing 100012, China; email: [email protected] Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
F. Hammer
Affiliation:
GEPI, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, 92195, MeudonFrance
M. Rodrigues
Affiliation:
GEPI, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, 92195, MeudonFrance
Y. H. Zhao
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, A 20 Datun Road Chaoyang District, Beijing 100012, China; email: [email protected]
G. H. Zhong
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, A 20 Datun Road Chaoyang District, Beijing 100012, China; email: [email protected] Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We compare six evolutionary population synthesis (EPS) models, which have been popularly used in stellar populations analyses for galaxies. The resulted stellar populations of star-forming galaxies and E+A galaxies from these EPS models show that the dominated contribution (fraction) from young, intermediate and old populations to their lights are consistent, although the individual numbers may change significantly, 3-30%, which could relate to the different ingredients in EPS models, such as the stellar library, the stellar evolution tracks etc.

Type
Poster Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Bertelli, G., Bressan, A., Chiosi, C., Fagotto, F., & Nasi, E. 1994, A&A, 106 275Google Scholar
Bruzual, A. G. & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassisi, S., Castellani, V., Ciarcelluti, P., Piotto, G., & Zoccali, M. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. Y., Liang, Y. C., Hammer, F., Zhao, Y. H., & Zhong, G. H. 2009, A&A, 495, 457Google Scholar
Cid Fernandes, R., Mateus, A., Sodré, L. et al. MNRAS, 358, 363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagotto, F., Bressan, A., Bertelli, G., & Chiosi, C. 1994, A&AS, 104, 365Google Scholar
Girardi, L., Bressan, A., Bertelli, G., & Chiosi, C. 2000, A&AS, 141, 371Google Scholar
Goto, T. 2007, MNRAS, 381, 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotulla, R., Fritze, U., Weilbacher, P., & Anders, P. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurucz, R. L. 1992, IAU Symp. 149, 225Google Scholar
Le Borgne, J.-F., Bruzual, G., Pell, R. et al. 2003, A&A, 402, 433Google Scholar
Lejeune, Th., Cuisinier, F., & Buser, R. 1998, A&AS, 130, 65Google Scholar
Maraston, C. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marigo, P. & Girardi, L. 2007, A&A, 469, 239Google Scholar
Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Blázquez, P., Peletier, R. F., Jiménez-Vicente, J. et al. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaller, G., Schaerer, D., Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 1992, A&AS, 96, 269Google Scholar
Silva, L., Granato, G. L., Bressan, A., & Danese, L. 1998, ApJ, 509, 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vazdekis, A., Cenarro, A. J., Gorgas, J., Cardiel, N., & Peletier, R. F. 2003, MNRAS, 340, 1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar