Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:53:56.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Binarity in Massive Young Stellar Objects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2024

Robert G. Shenton*
Affiliation:
School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, LS2 9JT Leeds, UK
René D. Oudmaijer
Affiliation:
School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, LS2 9JT Leeds, UK
Stuart L. Lumsden
Affiliation:
School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, LS2 9JT Leeds, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Most massive stars (up to 100%) are thought to be in binary systems. The multiplicity of massive stars seems to be intrinsically linked to their formation and evolution, and so Massive Young Stellar Objects are key in observing this early stage of star formation. We have surveyed hundreds of MYSOs across the Galaxy from the RMS catalogue, using UKIDSS and VVV point source data. Preliminary results show binary fractions of 44±3% for the UKIDSS sample and 32±3% for the VVV sample. In addition we use the K-band magnitudes as a proxy for the companion mass, and find a significant fraction of the detected companions have estimated mass ratios greater than 0.5, which suggests a deviation from the capture formation scenario.

Type
Poster Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Chini, R., Hoffmeister, V. H., Nasseri, A., Stahl, O., & Zinnecker, H. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 1925 Google Scholar
Duchêne, G., & Kraus, A. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 269 Google Scholar
Koumpia, E., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, L5 Google Scholar
Koumpia, E., et al. 2021, A&A, 654, A109 Google Scholar
Lucas, P. W., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 391, 136 Google Scholar
Lumsden, S. L., Hoare, M. G., Urquhart, J. S., Oudmaijer, R. D., Davies, B., Mottram, J. C., Cooper, H. D. B., & Moore, T. J. T. 2013, ApJS, 208, 11 Google Scholar
Pomohaci, R., Oudmaijer, R. D., & Goodwin, S. P. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 226 Google Scholar
Saito, R. K., et al. 2012, A&A, 537, A107 Google Scholar
Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161 Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Shenton et al. supplementary material

Shenton et al. supplementary material

Download Shenton et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 3.1 MB