Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:53:34.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Automated sunspot detection and the evolution of sunspot magnetic fields during solar cycle 23

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2011

Fraser Watson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy Kelvin Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK email: [email protected]
Lyndsay Fletcher
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy Kelvin Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The automated detection of solar features is a technique which is relatively underused but if we are to keep up with the flow of data from spacecraft such as the recently launched Solar Dynamics Observatory, then such techniques will be very valuable to the solar community. Automated detection techniques allow us to examine a large set of data in a consistent way and in relatively short periods of time allowing for improved statistics to be carried out on any results obtained. This is particularly useful in the field of sunspot study as catalogues can be built with sunspots detected and tracked without any human intervention and this provides us with a detailed account of how various sunspot properties evolve over time. This article details the use of the Sunspot Tracking And Recognition Algorithm (STARA) to create a sunspot catalogue. This catalogue is then used to analyse the magnetic fields in sunspot umbrae from 1996-2010, taking in the whole of solar cycle 23.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Hale, G. E. 1908, Astrophys. J., 315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, G. & Rabin, D., Solar Phys., 141, 253Google Scholar
Mathew, S. K., Martínez Pillet, V., Solanki, S. K. & Krivova, N. A., 2007, Astron. Astrophys, 465, 291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheron, G. 1975, Random Sets and Integral Geometry, Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Penn, M. J. & Livingston, W. 2006, Astrophys. J., 649, L45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penn, M. J. & MacDonald, R. K. D., 2007, Astrophys. J., 662, L123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schad, T. A. & Penn, M. J., 2010, Solar Phys., 262, 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherrer, P. H., Bogart, R. S., Bush, R. I., Hoeksema, J. T., Kosovichev, A. G., Schou, J. & others 1995, Solar Phys., 162, 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serra, J. 1982, Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology, Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
Solanki, S. K. 2003, A&AR, 11, 153Google Scholar
Watson, F., Fletcher, L., Dalla, S., & Marshall, S. 2009, Solar Phys., 260, 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar