Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:18:41.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Arecibo Methanol Maser Galactic Plane Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2007

Jagadheep D. Pandian ,
Paul. F. Goldsmith  and
Avinash A. Deshpande
Jagadheep D. Pandian
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany e-mail: [email protected]
Paul. F. Goldsmith
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Avinash A. Deshpande
Affiliation:
Raman Research Institute, Bangalore 560080, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Arecibo Methanol Maser Galactic Plane Survey (AMGPS) is a blind survey for 6.7 GHz methanol masers in a section of the Galactic plane visible from the Arecibo radio telescope. The survey for these signposts of massive star formation is complete at a flux density level of 0.27 Jy making it the most sensitive blind survey for methanol masers carried out to date, and resulted in the detection of 86 methanol masers, 48 of which are new discoveries. The properties of methanol masers discovered in the survey are consistent with their being associated with early phases of massive star formation. The data also show the tangent point of the Carina-Sagittarius spiral arm to be around a Galactic longitude of 49.6°.

Keywords

surveysstars: formationGalaxy: structure
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S242: Astrophysical Masers and their Environments , March 2007 , pp. 208 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Clemens, D. P. 1985, ApJ 295, 422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordes, J. M., & Lazio, T. J. W. 2002, astro-ph/0207156Google Scholar
Ellingsen, S. P. 2006, ApJ 638, 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellingsen, S. P., von Bibra, M. L., McCulloch, P. M., Norris, R. P., Deshpande, A. A., & Phillips, C. J. 1996, MNRAS 280, 378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, V. A., & MacLeod, G. C. 1989, AJ 97, 786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menten, K. M. 1991, ApJ 380, L75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minier, V., Burton, M. G., Hill, T., Pestalozzi, M. R., Purcell, C. R., Garay, G., Walsh, A. J., & Longmore, S. 2005, A&A 429, 945Google Scholar
Minier, V., Conway, J. E., & Booth, R. S. 2001, A&A 369, 278Google Scholar
Pandian, J. D., Goldsmith, P. F., & Deshpande, A. A. 2007, ApJ 656, 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pestalozzi, M. R., Minier, V., & Booth, R. S. 2005, A&A 432, 737Google Scholar
Szymczak, M., & Kus, A. J. 2000, A&A 360, 311Google Scholar
Szymczak, M., Kus, A. J., Hrynek, G., Krepa, A., & Pazderski, E. 2002, A&A 392, 277Google Scholar
Vallee, J. P. 1985, ApJ 454, 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Walt, J. 2005, MNRAS 360, 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. O. S., & Churchwell, E. 1989, ApJ 340, 265CrossRefGoogle Scholar