Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T16:09:05.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decentralized Enforcement of EC Law: Is the European Commission Still the Guardian of the Treaties?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Jacquelyn F. MacLennan
Jacquelyn F. MacLennan*
Affiliation:
Forrester, Norall & Sutton, Brussels
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Emerging Issues on Compliance and Effectiveness within the European Union
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 91 , 1997 , pp. 165 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., Communication from the Commission Implementing Community Environmental Law, COM(96)500 final.

2 See the Commission’s Annual Reports on the Implementation of the Internal Market.

3 COM(96)520.

4 Commissioner Monti Speech 97/55, Mar. 7, 1997.

5 See, e.g., Williams, Rhiannon, The European Commission and the Enforcement of Environmental Law: An Invidious Position, 14 Oxford Y.B. Eur. L. 351 (1994)Google Scholar.

6 Case C-300/95, Commission v. U.K., 1997 E.C.R____.

7 See Case C-106/89, Marleasing SA v. La Comercial Internacional de Alimentación SA, 1992 E.C.R. I-4135.

8 Eg., Joined Cases C-6790 and C-9/90, Francovich v. Italy, 1991 E.C.R. 1-5357.

9 Communication of June 8, 1996, 1996 O.J. (C 242) 6.

10 Communication of January 8, 1997.

11 Case T-24/90, Automec srl v. Commission, 1992 E.C.R. 11-2223 [hereinafter Automec II].

12 See, e.g., Case 234/89, Delimitis v. Henninger Brau, 1991 E.C.R. 1-935; Automec II, supra note 11.

13 1993 O.J.(C39)6.

14 1996 O.J.(C262)5.

15 See, e.g., Wesseling, Rein, Subsidiarity in Community Antitrust Law: Setting the Right Agenda, 22 Eur. L. Rev. 35 (1998)Google Scholar.

16 See Lang, John Temple, The Duties of National Courts under Community Constitutional Law, 21 Eur. L. Rev. 3 (1998)Google Scholar.