Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T00:50:46.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Report of Committee on Study of Legal Problems of the United Nations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Hans Aufricht ,
Benjamin V. Cohen ,
Leland M. Goodrich ,
Ivan S. Kerno ,
Charles P. Noyes  and
Louis B. Sohn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Appendix
Information
Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its annual meeting (1921-1969) , Volume 52 , 1958 , pp. 285 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 35 Dept. of State Bulletin 743, at 745 (1956). See also the President’s address of Feb. 20, 1957, which laid stress on “greater effort by the United Nations and its members to secure justice and conformity with international law. Peace and justice are two sides of the same coin.” 36 ibid. 387, at 389 (1957).

2 U.N.C.I.O. Doc. 702, IV/1/55; 13 U.N.C.I.O. Docs. 557-61.

3 U.N.C.I.O. Doc. 913, IV/1/74; 13 U.N.C.I.O. Docs. 381, at 390-392.

4 Australia, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Denmark, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Haiti, India, Iran, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Thailand, Union of South Africa, United Kingdom, and Uruguay.

5 Colombia, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, and Uruguay.

6 Australia, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, Thailand, Union of South Africa, and United Kingdom.

7 Bolivia, Brazil, India, and Iran.

8 E.g., declarations of Belgium, Guatemala, and Turkey.

9 Cambodia, China, France, Honduras, Israel, Liberia, Mexico, Pakistan, Philippines, Sudan, Sweden, and the United States.

10 Liechtenstein and Switzerland.

11 [1957] I.C.J. Rep. 9, at 26-27.

12 Ibid. at 43-59, 68-70.

13 Ibid. 105, at 107. See the arguments presented by the United States in its memorandum of Jan. 11, 1957, rejecting Swiss request for the arbitration of the dispute. 36 Dept. of State Bulletin 350, at 357-358 (1957). Cf. Briggs, H.W., “Towards the Rule of Law,” 51 A.J.I.L. 517 (1957)Google Scholar; Becker, L. E., “Some Political Problems of the Legal Adviser,” p. 266 at 267, above; and discussion, pp. 114-134 aboveGoogle Scholar.

14 General Assembly, 12th Sess., Official Records, Supp. No. 1A, p. 5 (Doc. A/3594/Add.l).

15 Ibid.

16 34 Dept. of State Bulletin 739, at 742-743 (1956); 1956 Proceedings, American Society of International Law 11, at 17-18.

17 Brownell, H. Jr., “Law in the Settlement of Disputes between Nations,” 31 Connecticut Bar J. 346, at 355 Google Scholar.

18 See, e.g., Rhyne, Charles S., “World Law or World Holocaust,” 28 Journal, Oklahoma Bar Association 1857-1862 (1957)Google Scholar.

19 Such list was contained, for instance, in Reservation No. 4 to the Covenant of the League of Nations, considered by the Senate in March, 1920. 69 Cong. Rec. 4599 (1920).