Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T06:12:30.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stochastic Flow-Shop Scheduling with Lateness-Related Performance Measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2009

Chung-Yee Lee
Affiliation:
Industrial and Systems Engineering DepartmentThe University of Florida Gainesville, Florida 32611
Chen-Sin Lin
Affiliation:
Industrial and Systems Engineering DepartmentThe University of Florida Gainesville, Florida 32611

Abstract

In this paper we consider stochastic flow-shop scheduling with reference to certain lateness-related performance measures. We show that for various assumptions on the distribution of job-processing times of a flow shop, certain scheduling policies following the stochastic analogy of the Earliest Due Date (EDD) rule yield optimal results.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banerjee, B.P. (1965). Single facility sequencing with random execution times. Operations Research 13: 358364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxma, O.J. & Forst, F.G. (1986). Minimizing the expected weighted number of tardy jobs in stochastic flow shops, Operations Research Letters 5: 119126.Google Scholar
Brown, M. & Solomon, H. (1973). Optimal issuing policies under stochastic field lives. Journal of Applied Probability 10: 184197.Google Scholar
Crabill, T.B. & Maxwell, W.L. (1969). Single machine sequencing with random processing times and random due-dates. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 16: 549554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, M.A.H., Lenstra, J.K. & Rinnooy, Kan A.H.G. (1981). Deterministic and stochastic scheduling. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study and Research Insitute on Theoretical Approaches to Scheduling Problems, Durham, England, 07 617. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Forst, F. G. (1984). A review of the static, stochastic job sequencing literature. Opsearch 21: 127144.Google Scholar
Lawler, E.L., Lenstra, J.K., Rinnooy, Kan A.H.G. & Shmoys, D.B. (1989). Sequencing and scheduling: Algorithms and complexity. Report BS-R8909, Center for Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Pinedo, M. (1982). Minimizing the expected makespan in stochastic flow shops. Operations Research 30: 148162.Google Scholar
Pinedo, M. (1983). Stochastic scheduling with release dates and due dates. Operations Research 31: 559572.Google Scholar
Pinedo, M. (1984). Optimal policies in stochastic shop scheduling. Annals of Operations Research 1: 305329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinedo, M. (1985). A note on stochastic shop models in which jobs have the same processing requirements on each machine. Management Science 31: 840846.Google Scholar
Pinedo, M. & Wie, S.H. (1986). Inequalities for stochastic flow shops and job shops. Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis 2: 6169.Google Scholar
Ross, S.M. (1983). Introduction to stochastic dynamic programming. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M.L., Dudek, R.A. & Blair, E.L. (1986). Characteristics of U.S. flexible manufacturing system-A survey. In Stecke, K.E. and Sun, R. (Eds.), Flexible manufacturing systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Weiss, G. (1982). Multiserver stochastic scheduling. In Dempster, M.A.H., Lenstra, J.K., and Kan, A.H.G. Rinnooy (Eds.), Deterministic and stochastic scheduling. Boston: D. Reidel, pp. 157179.Google Scholar