Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T23:20:26.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Paramedic Utilization of the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway in High-Fidelity Simulated Critical Care Scenarios

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2013

Donald Byars*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia USA
Bruce Lo
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia USA
Jeff Yates
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia USA
*
Correspondence: Donald Byars, MD, RDCS 600 Gresham Drive Raleigh Building, Suite 304 Norfolk, VA 23507 USA E-mail [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction

Successful oxygenation and ventilation can mean the difference between life and death in the prehospital setting. While airway challenges can be numerous within the confines of the emergency department, there are many additional confounding difficulties in the prehospital setting, which include limited access to equipment, poor lighting, extreme environments, limited personnel to assist, no immediate backup, and limited rescue airway options. The concept of an easy, reliable, and rapidly deployable alternative rescue airway device is critical, especially when considering the addition of rapid sequence intubation protocols in the prehospital setting.

Hypothesis

The primary objective of this study was to ascertain whether paramedics can be trained to deploy this alternative airway device with an acceptable success rate in a simulated critical care airway scenario. The secondary objective was to determine whether the previously-trained paramedics were able to retain their ability to deploy the device successfully at one year.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational, single-group, descriptive cohort, educational trial. Forty paramedics were trained in the use of the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (I-LMA) in a simulation medicine curriculum culminating in a simulated critical care difficult airway scenario requiring urgent oxygenation and ventilation after failed traditional endotracheal intubation. An emergency medicine physician proctor determined successful airway management. Repeat testing was then performed at approximately one year out, challenging the medics to intubate a mannequin using the I-LMA during an unrelated training session.

Results

Of the 40 paramedics who underwent complete simulation training, 39 were able to intubate and ventilate the simulated difficult airway using the I-LMA during the critical care scenario. This yields a success rate of 97.5% (95% CI, 87.1%-99.4%). At approximately one year out, 35 out of 35 medics were able to intubate the mannequin using the I-LMA, resulting in a success rate of 100% (95% CI, 91.4%-100%).

Conclusions

In this study, paramedics were able to deploy the I-LMA with a high degree of success in a simulated difficult airway, with a high degree of skill retention at one year out.

ByarsD, LoB, YatesJ. Evaluation of Paramedic Utilization of the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway in High-Fidelity Simulated Critical Care Scenarios. Prehosp Disaster Med.2013;28(6):1-2.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Wang, HE. Out-of-hospital airway management in the United States. Resuscitation. 2011;82(4):378-385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Lubin, J, Carter, R. The feasibility of daily mannequin practice to improve intubation success. Air Medical Journal. 2009;28(4):195-197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Rosenblatt, WH, Murphy, M. The intubating laryngeal mask: use of a new ventilating-intubating device in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33(2):234-238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The Evidence for Evidence-Based Practice Implementation. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2659. Accessed January 20, 2013.Google Scholar
5.Griffin, C. Didacticism: Lectures and Lecturing, in Jarvis P, (Ed). The Theory and Practice of Teaching. London: Kogan Page Ltd; 2002:50-89.Google Scholar
6.Kneebone, RL, Scott, W, Darzi, A, et al. Simulation and clinical practice: strengthening the relationship. Med Educ. 2004;38(10):1095-1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. LMA North America, Inc. Instructions for Use—LMA Fastrach. http://www.lmana.com/viewifu.php?ifu=17. Accessed August 1, 2013.Google Scholar