Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:01:45.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Six-Hour Manual Ventilation with a Bag-Valve-Tube Device by Briefly Trained Non-Medical Personnel is Feasible

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2020

Nana Maklada ,
Malka Katz Shalhav Open the ORCID record for Malka Katz Shalhav [Opens in a new window] ,
Emanuele Lagazzi  and
Pinchas Halpern
Nana Maklada
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Malka Katz Shalhav
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Emanuele Lagazzi
Affiliation:
University of Genoa, School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Genova, Italy
Pinchas Halpern*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
*
Correspondence: Pinchas Halpern, MD Chair, Division of Emergency Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel Aviv6423906, Israel, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rationale:

Manual ventilation with a bag-valve device (BVD) is a Basic Life Support skill. Prolonged manual ventilation may be required in resource-poor locations and in severe disasters such as hurricanes, pandemics, and chemical events. In such circumstances, trained operators may not be available and lay persons may need to be quickly trained to do the job.

Objectives:

The current study investigated whether minimally trained operators were able to manually ventilate a simulated endotracheally intubated patient for six hours.

Methods:

Two groups of 10 volunteers, previously unfamiliar with manual ventilation, received brief, structured BVD-tube ventilation training and performed six hours of manual ventilation on an electronic lung simulator. Operator cardiorespiratory variables and perceived effort, as well as the quality of the delivered ventilation, were recorded. Group One ventilated a “normal lung” (compliance 50cmH2O/L, resistance 5cmH2O/L/min). Group Two ventilated a “moderately injured lung” (compliance 20cmH2O/L, resistance 20cmH2O/L/min).

Results:

Volunteers’ blood pressure, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) were stable throughout the study. Perceived effort was minimal. The two groups provided clinically adequate and similar RRs (13.3 [SD = 3.0] and 14.1 [SD = 2.5] breaths/minute, respectively) and minute volume (MV; 7.6 [SD = 2.1] and 7.7 [SD = 1.4] L/minute, respectively).

Conclusions:

The results indicate that minimally trained persons can effectively perform six hours of manual BVD-tube ventilation of normal and moderately injured lungs, without undue effort. Quality of delivered ventilation was clinically adequate.

Keywords

bag-valve-tube devicedisastermanual ventilationminimally trained operatorsterrorism
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , August 2020 , pp. 358 - 363
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kaji, A, Koenig, KL, Bey, T. Surge capacity for health care systems: a conceptual framework. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(11):1157–1159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tadmor, B, McManus, J, Koenig, KL. The art and science of surge: experience from Israel and the US military. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(11):1130–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EM-DAT: The International Disaster Database; 2006. http://www.emdat.net/index.htm. Accessed October 2, 2007.Google Scholar
Cocanour, C, Allen, S, Mazabob, J, et al.Lessons learned from the evacuation of an urban teaching hospital. Arch Surg. 2002;137(10):1141–1145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nates, J. Combined external and internal hospital disaster: impact and response in a Houston trauma center intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(3):686–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scales, DC, Green, K, Chan, AK, et al.Illness in intensive care staff after brief exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9(10):1205–1210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubinson, L, Nuzzo, JB, Talmor, DS, et al.Augmentation of hospital critical care capacity after bioterrorist attacks or epidemics: recommendations of the working group on emergency mass critical care. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(10):2393–2403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, KR, Nagel, NE. Mass medical evacuation: Hurricane Katrina and nursing experiences at the New Orleans airport. Disaster Manage Response. 2007;5(2):56–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
deBoisblanc, BP. Hawk, Black, please come down: reflections on a hospital’s struggle to survive in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172(10):1239–1240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sprung, CL, Zimmerman, JL, Christian, MD. Recommendations for intensive care unit and hospital preparation for influenza epidemic or mass disaster: summary report of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine’s task force for intensive care unit triage during an influenza epidemic or mass disaster. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(3):428–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lassen, HCA. Management of Life-Threatening Poliomyelitis. Copenhagen, 1952-1956, with a Survey of Autopsy Findings in 115 Cases. Edinburgh: Livingstone; 1956.Google Scholar
Farmer, JC, Carlton, PK. Providing critical care during a disaster: the interface between disaster response agencies and hospitals. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(3 Suppl):56–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gervais, HW, Eberle, B, Konietzke, D, et al.Comparison of blood gases of ventilated patients during transport. Crit Care Med. 1987;15(8):761–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, JY, Bhalla, N, King, R. Training medical students in bag-valve-mask technique as an alternative to mechanical ventilation in a disaster surge setting. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24(5):402–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Airways management: bag-valve-mask ventilation. BMJ Learning. https://learning.bmj.com/learning/module-intro/bag-valve-mask.ventilation.html?locale=en_GB&moduleId=10033817. Accessed November 2019.Google Scholar
Lee, HM, Cho, KH, Choi, YH, et al.Can you deliver accurate tidal volume by manual resuscitator? Emerg Med J. 2008;25(10):632–634CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidelin, PH, Stolarek, IH, Littlewood, DG. Comparison of six methods of emergency ventilation. Lancet. 1986;2(8518):1274–1275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neyman, G, Irvin, CB. A single ventilator for multiple simulated patients to meet disaster surge. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(11):1246–1249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpern, P, Dang, T, Epstein, Y, et al.Six hours of manual ventilation with a bag-valve-mask device is feasible and clinically consistent. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(3):e222–e226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borg, G. Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Champaign, Illinois USA: Human Kinetics; 1998;104.Google Scholar
Hochberg, Y. Some generalizations of the T-method in simultaneous inference. Journal of Multivariate Analysis. 1974;4(2):224–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, V, Idris, AH, Dörges, V, et al.The respiratory system during resuscitation: a review of history, risk of infection during assisted ventilation, respiratory mechanics, and ventilation strategies for patients with an unprotected airway. Resuscitation. 2001;49(2):123–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bacior, J. Life Threatening Risks in Manual Ventilation: Training to Improve Technique and Patient Outcomes. 2006 Ingmar Medical. www.ingmarmed.com. Accessed November 2019.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Maklada et al. Supplementary Materials

Maklada et al. Supplementary Materials

Download Maklada et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 394.2 KB