Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:05:38.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Primary Triage, Evacuation Priorities, and Rapid Primary Distribution between Adjacent Hospitals—Lessons Learned from a Suicide Bomber Attack in Downtown Tel-Aviv

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Moshe Pinkert ,
Ofer Lehavi ,
Odeda Benin Goren ,
Yaron Raiter ,
Ari Shamis ,
Zvi Priel ,
Dagan Schwartz ,
Avishay Goldberg ,
Yehezkel Levi  and
Yaron Bar-Dayan
Moshe Pinkert
Affiliation:
Home Front Command Medical Department
Ofer Lehavi
Affiliation:
Sorasky Medical Center Tel Aviv, Israel
Odeda Benin Goren
Affiliation:
Sorasky Medical Center Tel Aviv, Israel
Yaron Raiter
Affiliation:
Home Front Command Medical Department
Ari Shamis
Affiliation:
Director, Sheba General Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
Zvi Priel
Affiliation:
Deputy Director, Edith Wolfson Hospital, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Dagan Schwartz
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel Israeli EMS, Magen David Adom, Medical Division
Avishay Goldberg
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
Yehezkel Levi
Affiliation:
Israeli Defense Force Medical Corps, Surgeon General Headquarters
Yaron Bar-Dayan*
Affiliation:
Home Front Command Medical Department Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
*
16 Dolev St. Neve Savion Or-Yehuda, Israel E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Terrorist attacks have occurred in Tel-Aviv that have caused mass-casualties.The objective of this study was to draw lessons from the medical response to an event that occurred on 19 January 2006, near the central bus station, Tel-Aviv, Israel. The lessons pertain to the management of primary triage, evacuation priorities, and rapid primary distribution between adjacent hospitals and the operational mode of the participating hospitals during the event.

Methods:

Data were collected in formal debriefings both during and after the event. Data were analyzed to learn about medical response components, interactions, and main outcomes. The event is described according to Disastrous Incidents Systematic AnalysiS Through—Components, Interactions and Results (DISAST-CIR) methodology.

Results:

A total of 38 wounded were evacuated from the scene, including one severely injured, two moderately injured, and 35 mildly injured. The severe casualty was the first to be evacuated 14 minutes after the explosion. All of the casualties were evacuated from the scene within 29 minutes. Patients were distributed between three adjacent hospitals including one non-Level-1 Trauma Center that received mild casualties. Twenty were evacuated to the nearby, Level-1 Sourasky Medical Center, including the only severely injured patient. Nine mildly injured patients were evacuated to the Sheba Medical Center and nine to Wolfson Hospital, a non-Level-1 Trauma Center hospital. All the receiving hospitals were operated according to the mass-casualty incident doctrine.

Conclusions:

When a mass-casualty incident occurs in the vicinity of more than one hospital, primary triage, evacuation priority decision-making, and rapid distribution of casualties between all of the adjacent hospitals enables efficient and effective containment of the event.

Keywords

distributionevacuationmasscasualty incidentprimary triageprioritiesterrorism
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 337 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Almogy, G, Belzberg, H, Mintz, Y et al. : Suicide bombing attacks: Update and modifications to the protocol. Ann Surg 2004;239(3):295–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Leiba, A, Blumenfeld, A, Bar-Dayan, Y et al. : Lessons learned from cross-border medical response to the terrorist bombings in Tabba and Ras-el-Satan, Egypt, on 07 October 2004. Prehospital Disast Med 2005;20(4):253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Leiba, A, Halperin, P, Bar-Dayan, Y et al. : A Terrorist Suicide bombing at the nightclub Analyzing medical response to a nighttime, weekend, multi casualty incident scenario. J Emerg Nurs 2006;32(4):294–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Leiba, A, Halperin, P, Bar-Dayan, Y et al. : Lessons from a terrorist attack in Tel-Aviv Market: Putting all the golden eggs in one basket might save lives. International Journal of Disaster Medicine 2004;2:157–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Pinkert, M, Leiba, A, Bar-Dayan, Y et al. : The significance of a small, level-3 ‘semi evacuation’ hospital in a terrorist attack in a nearby town. Disasters 2007;31(3):227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Peleg, K, Michaelson, M, Shapira, SC et al. : Principles of emergency management in disasters. Adv Ren Replace Ther 2003;10(2):117–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Leiba, A, Schwartz, D, Bar-Dayan, Y et al. : Disastrous Incidents Systematic AnalysiS Through—Components, Interactions, and Results-Disastrous Incidents Systematic Analysis Through Components, Interactions & Results.Application to a large-scale train accident. J Emerg Med 2007; doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.09.205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Malik, ZU, Pervez, M, Safdar, A et al. : Triage and management of mass casualties in a train accident. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2004;14(8):513–4.Google Scholar
9.Leiba, A, Blumenfeld, A, Bar-Dayan, Y et al. : A four-step approach for establishment of a national medical response to mega-terrorism. Prehospital Disast Med 2006;21:436–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Schwartz, D, Pinkert, M, Bar-Dayan, Y et al. : Significance of a Level-2, “selective, secondary evacuation” hospital during a peripheral town terrorist attack. Prehospital Disast Med 2007;22:59–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed