Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:28:00.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orthopedic Knowledge and Need in the Provincial Philippines: Pilot Study of a Population-Based Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2018

Christopher S. Courtney  and
Thomas D. Kirsch
Christopher S. Courtney*
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland USA; Honor Health Department of Emergency Medicine, Scottsdale, Arizona USA; The Nothing to Lose Foundation, Phoenix, Arizona USA; Romblon Provincial Hospital, Odiongon, Romblon, Philippines
Thomas D. Kirsch
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Uniformed Services University of the Health Services, Baltimore, MarylandUSA
*
Correspondence: Christopher S. Courtney, MD PO Box 2808 Scottsdale, Arizona USA 85252 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Interventions to reduce disability from acute orthopedic injuries require a primary assessment of knowledge and need. There are no previous studies to assess this need in the remote provincial islands of the Philippines, an area recurrently affected by natural disaster.

Problem

A preliminary assessment of orthopedic knowledge and need was performed to be expanded for regional or national implementation.

Methods

Two independent surveys were conducted of households and mid-level providers who represent the first contact of care. The goal of the survey was to describe the local health care system, to identify barriers to care, and to assess gaps in knowledge for acute traumatic orthopedic injuries. Both surveys were conducted in June of 2015.

Population proportional sampling assessed a total of 100 households from 25 local Barangay communities. Questions focused on existing knowledge of acute traumatic orthopedic injuries and barriers to care.

The mid-level provider survey focused on knowledge and barriers to care regarding acute traumatic orthopedic injuries. A total of 10 school nurses and Barangay midwives representing 25 local Barangay were surveyed.

Results

In the household population survey, 84% of respondents reported cost was either always or sometimes a barrier to care; 73% cited transportation as a barrier to care. A total of 68% of respondents reported that they would seek care at the provincial hospital for a suspected broken bone; 28% percent of respondents did not believe broken bones making an arm or leg crooked could be corrected without surgery. Only 55% percent believed care should be sought within six hours of injury, and 37% stated that more than three days after an injury was an appropriate timeframe to seek care.

Of the mid-level providers surveyed, 90% reported that they would refer possible broken bones to a higher level of care. Aggregate ranking of barriers to care from greatest to least were: cost, transportation, knowledge of time sensitive nature of treatment, religious beliefs, and other (not specified). In all, 100% reported that an education initiative regarding acute orthopedic injuries would increase the number of patients seeking care within 12 hours.

Conclusion

The survey describes perceived barriers to care and gaps in knowledge for acute orthopedic injuries. With some modification, this survey tool could be expanded and utilized on a regional or national level to assess gaps in knowledge and barriers to acute orthopedic care.

CourtneyCS, KirschTD. Orthopedic Knowledge and Need in the Provincial Philippines: Pilot Study of a Population-Based Survey. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(3):293–298.

Keywords

barriers to caredeveloping countryfractureprehospitaltrauma
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , June 2018 , pp. 293 - 298
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest/funding: Funding for this study was provided by a grant from The Emergency Medicine Foundation (Dallas, Texas USA). Additional funding was provided by the Nothing to Lose Foundation (Phoenix, Arizona USA), a 501c3 nongovernmental organization that has worked in this community for over eight years. Both authors are affiliated with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (Baltimore, Maryland USA). The primary author is the President of the Nothing to Lose Foundation, as which has no additional institutional or commercial affiliations and no potential conflicts of interest. The primary author is also affiliated with Honor Health (Scottsdale, Arizona USA) as an attending physician in Emergency Medicine. The authors have no additional affiliations or conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

1. World Health Organization. WHO Methods and Data Sources for Global Burden of Disease Estimates 2000-2012. Global Health Estimates Technical Paper WHO/HIS/HSI/GHE/2014.7. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/GlobalCOD_method_2000_2012.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed March 5, 2015.Google Scholar
2. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. New York, United Nations; 2013. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/publications/Files/WPP2012_HIGHLIGHTS.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed March 5, 2015.Google Scholar
3. Vos, T, Flaxman, AD, Naghavi, M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2163-2196.Google Scholar
4. Murray, CJL, Ezzati, M, Flaxman, AD, et al. GBD 2010: design, definitions, and metrics. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2063-2066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Murray, CJL, Vos, T, Lozano, R, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2013;380(9859):2197-2223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Mock, C, Cherian, MN. The global burden of musculoskeletal injuries: challenges and solutions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(10):2306-2316.Google Scholar
7. Beveridge, M, Howard, A. The burden of orthopaedic disease in developing countries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(8):1819-1822.Google Scholar
8. Kobusingye, O, et al. In: Jamison D, Breman JG, Measham A, et al (eds). Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. Emergency Care. New York, USA: Oxford University Press; 2006: 1261-1280.Google Scholar
9. Philippines Statistics Office. 2006 Family Income and Expenditure Survey. FIES Volume 2. Published November 23, 2006. Accessed March 5, 2015.Google Scholar
10. Goldfarb, R, Havrylyshyn, O, Mangum, S. Can remittances compensate for manpower outflows: the case of Philippine physicians. J Development Economics. 1984;15(1-3):1-17.Google Scholar
11. Peralta, PG, Sinon, JB. Emergency medicine in the Philippines. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26(6):743-745.Google Scholar
12. Jacobs, B, Ir, P, Bigdeli, M, Annear, PL, Van Damme, W. Addressing access barriers to health services: an analytical framework for selecting appropriate interventions in low-income Asian Countries. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(4):288-300.Google Scholar
13. Zirkle, Jr, Lewis, G. Injuries in developing countries—how can we help? The role of orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(10):2443-2450.Google Scholar
14. Mock, C, Quansah, R, Krishnan, R, Arreola-Risa, C, Rivara, F. Strengthening the prevention and care of injuries worldwide. Lancet. 2004;363(9427):2172-2179.Google Scholar
15. Abrahan, LM Jr. Delayed or late treatment of musculoskeletal injuries. Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2006;21(2):87.Google Scholar
16. Abrahan, LM Jr., Te, CV, Cruz, FD. Delayed open intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2006;21(2):88-98.Google Scholar
17. Mapa, D, Albis, ML, Comandante, DM, Cura, J, Ladao, MM. Spatial analysis of income growth in the Philippines. Evidence from intra-country data. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields. 2015;6(1):5-20.Google Scholar