Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:35:03.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sampling sexuality: gender, technology and the body in dance music

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Extract

Bayton (1992) is right to be preoccupied by the mutual blindness between feminism and popular music. For if pop music has been the twentieth-century cultural genre most centrally concerned with questions of sexuality, one would expect more feminist critique and engagement with it. It is undoubtedly true that feminists have often been suspicious of pop music as typifying everything that needs changing for girls in society (McRobbie 1978), and of rock music as a masculine culture that excludes women (Frith and McRobbie 1979). Conversely, those who wished to celebrate the political oppositionality of rock music have often had to draw an embarrassed veil around its sexual politics, and have had good reason to be wary of feminism's destructive potential. Nevertheless, Bayton's own bibliography shows the considerable work that has been done by feminists on popular music, and the problem is perhaps better seen as one of marginalisation of this work within both feminist theory and popular music studies. In addition, I would argue that the work of Radway (1987), Light (1984), Modleski (1984) and others, in ‘reclaiming’ the popular genres of romance reading and soap opera for women, does have parallels in popular music in the work of Greig (1989) and Bradby (1990) on girl-groups, or McRobbie on girls and dancing (1984). Cohen (1992) shows some of the mechanisms through which men exclude women from participation in rock bands, while Bayton's own study of women musicians parallels other sociological work on how women reshape work roles (1990). And the renewed interest in audience research in cultural studies has allowed a re-valorisation of girls' and women's experience as fans of popular music (Garratt 1984; Lewis 1992), and as creators of meaning in the music they listen to (Fiske 1989; Bradby 1990).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arditti, R., Duelli Klein, R. and Minden, S. 1984. Test-Tube Women: What Future for Motherhood (London)Google Scholar
Barrett, M. 1987. ‘The concept of difference’, Feminist Review, 26, pp. 2942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayton, M. 1990. ‘How women become musicians’, in On Record: Rock, Pop and the Written Word, ed. Frith, S. and Goodwin, A. (New York and London), pp. 238–57Google Scholar
Bayton, M. 1992. ‘Out on the margins: feminism and the study of popular music’, in Women: a Cultural Review, 3:1, pp. 51–9Google Scholar
Betrock, A. 1982. Girl Groups: The Story of a Sound (New York)Google Scholar
Bordo, S. 1990. ‘Feminism, postmodernism and gender-scepticism’, in Feminism/Postmodernism, ed. Nicholson, L. (London), pp. 135–56Google Scholar
Bradby, B. 1990. ‘Do-talk and don't-talk: the division of the subject in girl-group music’, in On Record: Rock, Pop and the Written Word, ed. Frith, S. and Goodwin, A. (New York and London), pp. 341–68Google Scholar
Bradby, B. 1992. ‘Like a virgin-mother?: materialism and maternalism in the songs of Madonna’, Cultural Studies, 6:1, pp. 7396Google Scholar
Bradby, B. and Torode, B. 1984. ‘Pity Peggy Sue’, Popular Music, 4, pp. 183205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bright, S. 1990. Susie Sexpert's Lesbian Sex World (Pittsburgh)Google Scholar
Cohen, S. 1992. Rock Culture in Liverpool: Popular Music in the Making (Oxford)Google Scholar
Connor, S. 1989. Postmodernist Culture (Oxford)Google Scholar
Doyle, R. 1988. The Commitments (London)Google Scholar
Durant, A. 1992. ‘A new day for music: digital technologies in contemporary music making’, in Culture, Technology and Creativity, ed. Hayward, P. (London), pp. 175–96Google Scholar
Dyer, R. 1990. ‘In defence of disco’, in On Record: Rock, Pop and the Written Word, ed. Frith, S. and Goodwin, A. (New York and London), pp. 410–18Google Scholar
Fiske, J. 1989. Reading the Popular (Boston)Google Scholar
Flax, J. 1987. ‘Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory’, Signs, 12:4, pp. 621–43Google Scholar
Fraser, N. and Nicholson, L. 1988. ‘Social criticism without philosophy: an encounter between feminism and postmodernism’, Theory, Culture and Society, 5:2/3, pp. 373–94Google Scholar
Frith, S. 1988. Music For Pleasure (Oxford)Google Scholar
Frith, S. and McRobbie, A. 1979. ‘Rock and sexuality’, Screen Education, 29, pp. 319Google Scholar
Gambaccini, P., Rice, T. and Rice, J. 1991. British Hit Singles: 8th Edition (London)Google Scholar
Garratt, S. 1984. ‘All of us love all of you’, in Signed, Sealed and Delivered, ed. Garratt, S. and Steward, S. (London), pp. 138–50Google Scholar
Goodwin, A. 1990. ‘Sample and hold: pop music in the age of digital reproduction’, in On Record: Rock, Pop and the Written Word, ed. Frith, S. and Goodwin, A. (New York and London), pp. 258–73Google Scholar
Greig, C. 1989. Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow: Girl Groups from the 50s On (London)Google Scholar
Griggers, C. 1990. ‘A certain tension in the visual/cultural field: Helmut Newton, Deborah Turbeville, and the Vogue fashion layout’, in Differences: a Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 2:2, pp. 76104Google Scholar
Grossberg, L. 1988. ‘You (still) have to fight for your right to party: music television as billboards of post-modern difference’, Popular Music, 7:3, pp. 315–32Google Scholar
Grossberg, L. 1991. ‘Rock, territorialization and power’, Cultural Studies, 5:3, pp. 358–67Google Scholar
Hacker, S. 1990. ‘The eye of the beholder: an essay on technology and eroticism’, in “Doing it the Hard Way”: Investigations of Gender and Technology (Boston and London)Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 1990. ‘A manifesto for cyborgs: science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s’, in Feminism/Postmodernism, ed. Nicholson, L. (London), pp. 190233Google Scholar
Hayward, P. 1992. ‘Industrial light and magic: style, technology and special effects in the music video and music television’, in Culture, Technology and Creativity, ed. Hayward, P. (London), pp. 125–47Google Scholar
Hebdige, D. 1987. Cut'n'Mix: Culture, Identity and Caribbean Music (London)Google Scholar
Hewitt, P. 1989. ‘It's my record (and I'll cry if I want to)’, New Musical Express, 21 10, p. 55Google Scholar
Hudson, B. 1984. ‘Femininity and adolescence’, in Gender and Generation, ed. McRobbie, A. and Nava, M. (London), pp. 31–3Google Scholar
Jameson, F. 1983. ‘Postmodernism and consumer society’, in The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Post-modern Culture, ed. Foster, H.Google Scholar
Jones, S. and Willis, P. 1990. ‘Music and symbolic creativity’, in Common Culture, ed. Willis, P. (Milton Keynes), pp. 5983Google Scholar
Jordanova, L. 1980. ‘Natural facts: a historical perspective on science and sexuality’, in Nature, Culture and Gender, ed. MacCormack, C. and Strathern, M. (Cambridge), pp. 4269Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. A. 1987. Rocking Around the Clock: Music Television, Postmodernism and Consumer Culture (London)Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. A. 1988. ‘Feminism/Oedipus/postmodernism: the case of MTV’, in Postmodernism and its Discontents, ed. Kaplan, E. A. (London), pp. 3044Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. A. 1992. Motherhood and Representation: the Mother in Popular Culture and Melodrama (London)Google Scholar
Langlois, T. 1992. ‘Can you feel it? DJs and House Music culture in the UK’, Popular Music, 11:2, pp. 229–38Google Scholar
Lewis, L. 1992. The Adoring Audience: Fan Culture and Popular Media (London)Google Scholar
Light, A. 1984. ‘Returning to Manderley: romance fiction, female sexuality and class’, Feminist Review, 16, pp. 725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lont, C. 1985. ‘A history of the women's music industry in the USA 1960–1985’, paper delivered to the Third International Conference of the International Association for the Study of Popular Music,Montreal, Canada,07Google Scholar
Marcus, G. 1976. ‘The girl groups’, in The Rolling Stone Illustrated History of Rock and Roll, ed. Miller, J. (New York), pp. 160–1Google Scholar
McDermott, P., Matthews, A. and Bennett, A. 1992. ‘Responding to recreational drug use: why club-goers need information, not outreach’, Druglink, 01/02, pp. 1213Google Scholar
McRobbie, A. 1978. ‘Working class girls and the culture of femininity’, in Women Take Issue (London), pp. 96131Google Scholar
McRobbie, A. 1984. ‘Dance and social fantasy’, in Gender and Generation, ed. McRobbie, A. and Nava, M. (London), pp. 130–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRobbie, A. 1988. ‘Peggy Sue got marketed’, Times Higher Education Supplement, 3 06 1988, p. 24Google Scholar
Modleski, T. 1984. Loving with a Vengeance: Mass Produced Fantasies for Women (New York)Google Scholar
Moore, H. 1988. Feminism and Anthropology (Oxford)Google Scholar
Newcombe, R. 1992. ‘A researcher reports from the rave’, Druglink, 01/02, pp. 1416Google Scholar
Patton, C. 1990. Inventing AIDS (London and New York)Google Scholar
Radway, J. 1987. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy and Popular Literature (London)Google Scholar
Rietveld, H. 1992. ‘Living the dream: analysis of the rave phenomenon in terms of ideology, consumerism and subculture’, Working Paper, Manchester Institute for Popular Culture, Manchester Polytechnic, and forthcoming in Redhead, S. et al. Rave Off: Politics and Deviance in Contemporary Youth Culture (Aldershot)Google Scholar
Rogers, B. 1980. The Domestication of Women: Discrimination in Developing Societies (London)Google Scholar
Sinker, M. 1990. ‘Free samples’, The Wire, 07, pp. 2022, 62Google Scholar
Spector, R. with Waldron, V.. 1991. Be My Baby (London)Google Scholar
Straw, W. 1991. ‘Communities and scenes in popular music’, Cultural Studies, 5:3, pp. 368–88Google Scholar
Thornton, S. 1990. ‘Strategies for reconstructing the popular past’, Popular Music, 9:3, pp. 8796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watney, S. and Carter, E. (eds.) 1989. Taking Liberties: AIDS and Cultural Politics (London)Google Scholar