Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:04:01.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rhythm, rhyme and reason: hip hop expressivity as political discourse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2014

Torgeir Uberg Nærland
Torgeir Uberg Nærland*
Affiliation:
Heien 25, 5037 Bergen, Norway E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using Norwegian hip hop as an example, this article argues that public sphere theory offers a fruitful theoretical framework in which to understand the political significance of music. Based on a musical and lyrical analysis of Lars Vaular's ‘Kem Skjøt Siv Jensen’ (Who Shot Siv Jensen) – a song that recently became the subject of extensive public political discourse in Norway – this article first highlights how the aesthetic language specific to hip hop music constitutes a form of political discourse that may be particularly effective in addressing and engaging publics. Further, the analysis brings attention to how hip hop music is characterised by phatic, rhetoric, affective and dramatic modes of communication that may be of value to democratic public discourse. Lastly, this article examines the expressive output of ‘Kem Skjøt Siv Jensen’ in light of Habermas' concept of communicative rationality. In conclusion, the article contends that the dichotomy between (‘rational’) verbal argument and (‘irrational’) musical expressivity constructed within public sphere theory is contrived and, moreover, that hip hop expressivity under certain conditions does conform to the standards of communicative rationality.

Type
Articles
Information
Popular Music , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , October 2014 , pp. 473 - 491
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Alim, S.H. 2003. ‘On some serious next millennium rap ishh: Pharao Monch, hip hop poetics, and the internal rhymes of internal affairs’, Journal of English Linguistics, 31, pp. 60–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alim, H.S. 2004. ‘“Bring it to the cypher” – hip-hop nation language’, in That's the Joint! The Hip-Hop Studies Reader, ed. Murray, F. and Neal, M.A. (New York, Routledge), pp. 530–64Google Scholar
Austin, J.L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955 (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Benhabib, S. 1996. ‘Introduction’, in Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, S. (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press), pp. 3–19Google Scholar
Bitzer, L.F. 1968. ‘The rhetorical situation’, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1/1, pp. 1–14. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40236733 (accessed 13 February 2013)Google Scholar
Black Public Sphere Collective 1995. The Black Public Sphere: A Public Culture Book (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Cooke, D. 1959. The Language of Music (Oxford, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Danielsen, A. 2008. ‘The musicalization of “reality”, reality rap and rap reality on Public Enemy's Fear of a Black Planet’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 11/4, pp. 405–21Google Scholar
Danielsen, A. 2009. ‘Iscenesatt marginalitet? – Om regional identitet i nordnorsk rap’, in Hip Hop i Skandinavien, ed. Krogh, M. and Stougaard Pedersen, B. (Århus, Århus Universitetsforlag), pp. 201–19Google Scholar
Eriksen, O.E. and Weigaard, J. 1999. Kommunikativ handling og deliberativt demokrati – Jürgen Habermas' teori om politikk og samfunn (Bergen, Fagbokforlaget)Google Scholar
Goodin, R. 2003. Reflective Democracy (Oxford, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Gramo 2012. Gramo-statistikken 2011. http://www.gramo.no (accessed 8 January 2013)Google Scholar
Gramo 2011. Gramo-statistikken 2010. http://www.gramo.no (accessed 8 January 2013)Google Scholar
Gripsrud, J. 2009. ‘The cultural dimension of democracy’, in Media, Democracy and European Culture, ed. Bondebjerg, M. and Madsen, P. (Bristol, Intellect), pp. 197–215Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1971. Borgerlig Offentlighet: dens fremvekst og forfall: henimot en teori om det borgerlige samfunn (Oslo, Gyldendal)Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1981. Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1 (Boston, MA, Beacon Press)Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2006. ‘Political communication in media society: does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research’, Communication Theory, 16, pp. 411–26Google Scholar
Hanson, M. 2008. ‘Suppose James Brown read Fanon: the Black Arts Movement, cultural nationalism and the failure of popular musical praxis’, Popular Music, 27/3, pp. 341–65Google Scholar
Hesmondhalgh, D. 2007. ‘Audiences and everyday aesthetics: talking about good and bad music’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10/4, pp. 507–27Google Scholar
Jacobson, R. 1960. ‘Linguistics and poetics’, in Style in Language, ed. Sebeok, T. (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press), pp. 350–77Google Scholar
Kitwana, B. 2002. The Hip-Hop Generation: Blacks and the crisis in African American culture (New York, Basic Civitas Books)Google Scholar
Krims, A. 2000. Rap Music and the Poetics of Identity (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Machin, D. 2010. Analysing Popular Music: Image, Sound, Text (London, Sage)Google Scholar
McGuigan, J. 2004. ‘The Cultural Public Sphere’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 8/4, pp. 427–443Google Scholar
Middleton, R. 1990. Studying Popular Music (Milton Keynes, Open University Press)Google Scholar
Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Nærland, T.U. 2014. ‘Hip hop and the public sphere: political commitment and communicative practices on the Norwegian hip hop scene’, Javnost/The Public, 21/1, pp. 37–52Google Scholar
Neal, M.A. 1999. What the Music Said (New York, Routledge)Google Scholar
Perry, I. 2004. Prophets of the Hood – Politics and Poetics in Hip Hop (Durham, NC, Duke University Press)Google Scholar
Potter, R.A. (ed.) 1995. Spectacular Vernaculars: Hip-hop and the Politics of Postmodernism (Albany, NY, State University of New York Press)Google Scholar
Pough, G.D. 2004. Check It While I Wreck It: Black Womanhood, Hi-Hop Culture, and the Public Sphere (Boston, MA, Northeastern University Press)Google Scholar
Rose, T. 1994. Black Noise: Rap Music and Black Culture in Contemporary America (Middletown, CT, Wesleyan University Press)Google Scholar
Searle, J.R. 1975. ‘A taxonomy of illocutionary acts’, in Language, Mind, and Knowledge, ed. Günderson, K. (Minneapolis, MN, University of Minneapolis Press), pp. 344–69Google Scholar
Smith, R.J. 2012. The One: The Life and Music of James Brown (New York, Gotham Books)Google Scholar
Smitherman, G. 1997. ‘“The Chain Remain the Same”: communicative practices in the hip hop nation’, Journal of Black Studies, 28/1, pp. 3–25Google Scholar
Street, J. 2012. Music and Politics (Cambridge, MA, Polity Press)Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. 1999. Speech, Music, Sound (London, Macmillan)Google Scholar
VG Lista n.d. http://lista.vg.no/ (accessed 4 March 2013)Google Scholar
Walser, R.W. 1995. ‘Rhythm, rhyme, and rhetoric in the music of Public Enemy’, Ethnomusicology, 39/2, pp. 193–217Google Scholar
Young, I.M. 1996. ‘Communication and The Other: beyond deliberative democracy’, in Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, S. (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press), pp. 120–37Google Scholar

Discography

Lars Vaular, ‘Kem Skjøt Siv Jensen’. Helt om dagen, helt om natten. NMG/G-Huset/Cosmos Music Group. 2010Google Scholar
Spotify: Lars Vaular – Kem skjøt Siv JensenGoogle Scholar
Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecwQfw_3FII (accessed 27 May 2013)Google Scholar