Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:57:02.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plugging and programming: pop radio and record promotion in Britain and the United States1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Extract

The radio networks of North America and Britain provide one of the most important promotional outlets for recorded music, setting programming agendas at radio stations and influencing the talent acquisition policies of record labels throughout the world. For many years there have been sharp contrasts in the way in which music radio has operated and been organised in these two countries. The promotion of records in Britain has mainly been directed towards one national non-commercial station, Radio 1, which plays an eclectic mixture of musical styles. In the United States radio promotion has been aimed across a complex of commercial stations which broadcast ‘narrowcast’ music very clearly defined according to various ‘formats’. However, the recent re-regulation of the broadcasting system in Britain has resulted in a proliferation of regional commercial stations that are responding to increasing competition by introducing narrowcasting policies similar to those of North America. With Radio 1's share of listeners declining and the prospect of national commercial stations being granted licences and further challenging Radio 1's dominance of pop broadcasting, it seems particularly pertinent to contrast the practices of record companies and radio stations in Britain and North America and highlight how they directly effect the production and consumption of pop music.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnard, S. 1989. On the Radio: Music Radio in Britain (Milton Keynes)Google Scholar
Barnes, K. 1988. ‘Top 40 Radio: a Fragment of the Imagination’, in Facing the Music, ed. Frith, S. (New York)Google Scholar
Berland, J. 1990. ‘Radio space and industrial time: Music formats, local narratives and technological mediations’, Popular Music, 9/2, pp. 179–92Google Scholar
Cole, M. 1991. ‘Time to pull the plug on pluggers?’, Music Week, 4 05, pp. 1011Google Scholar
Dannen, F. 1990. Hit Men: Power Brokers and Fast Money Inside the Music Business (New York)Google Scholar
Frith, S. 1978. The Sociology of Rock (London)Google Scholar
Hennion, A. and Meadel, C. 1986. ‘Programming music: radio as mediator’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 8, pp. 281303Google Scholar
Hirsch, P. 1972. ‘Processing fads and fashions: an organizational set analysis of cultural industry systems’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 77, No. 4, pp. 639–59Google Scholar
Lambert, S. 1990. ‘Are you listening carefully?’, Music Week, 24 03 1990, pp. 24–5Google Scholar
Lipsitz, G. 1990. Time Passages: Collective Memory and American Popular Culture (Minneapolis)Google Scholar
Rothenbuhler, E. 1987. ‘Commercial radio and popular music: processes of selection and factors of influence’, in Popular Music and Communication, ed. Lull, J. (Newbury Park) pp. 7895Google Scholar
Rumbold, J. 1992. ‘Don't knock the crock’, The Guardian, 30 03, p. 27Google Scholar
Sandall, R. 1991. ‘Fancy seeing you here’, Q Magazine, 04 1991, pp. 50–2Google Scholar
Schoemer, K. 1990. ‘College radio crosses over’, Rolling Stone, 10, pp. 135–40Google Scholar
Sklar, R. 1984. Rocking America: How the All-Hit Radio Stations Took Over (New York)Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, P. 1989. ‘Press to play’, Q Magazine, 06 1989, pp. 42–8Google Scholar
Towles, F. 1991. ‘Racism persists in music biz’, Billboard, 29 06, p. 12Google Scholar