Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:34:36.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘The hieroglyphics of love’: the torch singers and interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Abstract

The first law of love is subjective: subjectively, jealousy is deeper than love, it contains love's truth. This is because jealousy goes further in the apprehension and interpretation of signs. It is the designation of love, its finality. Indeed, it is inevitable that the signs of a loved person, once we ‘explicate’ them, should be revealed as deceptive: addressed to us, they nonetheless express worlds which exclude us and which the beloved will not and cannot make us know … Love's signs … are deceptive signs which can be addressed to us only by concealing what they express: the origin of unknown worlds, of unknown actions and thoughts which give them a meaning. They do not excite superficial, nervous exaltation, but the suffering of a deeper exploration. The beloved's lies are the hieroglyphics of love. The interpreter of love's signs is necessarily the interpreter of lies. His fate is expressed in the motto: to love without being loved. (Deleuze 1973)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrist, R. K. (ed.) 1970. The American Heritage of the 20s and 30s (New York)Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. 1964. The Psychoanalysis of Fire, trans. Ross, C. M. (Boston)Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J. 1985. Dreams That Money Can Buy: The Tragic Life of Libby Holman (London)Google Scholar
Davis, R. L. 1981. A History of Music in American Life, vol. 3: The Modern Era: 1920 – Present (Malabar, Florida)Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. 1973. Proust and Signs, trans. Howard, R. (London)Google Scholar
Durante, J. and Kofoed, J. 1931. Night Clubs (New York)Google Scholar
Erenberg, L. A. 1981. Steppin' Out: New York Nightlife and the Transformation of American Culture, 1890–1930 (Chicago)Google Scholar
Ewen, D. 1957. Panorama of American Popular Music (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.)Google Scholar
Farnsworth, M. 1956. The Ziegfeld Follies (New York)Google Scholar
Hamm, C. 1979. Yesterdays: Popular Song in America (New York)Google Scholar
Kinkle, R. D. 1974. The Complete Encyclopedia of Popular Music and Jazz, 1900–1950, 4 vols (New Rochelle)Google Scholar
Machlin, M. 1980. Libby (New York)Google Scholar
Maxwell, G. 1974. Helen Morgan, Life and Legend (New York)Google Scholar
Morris, L. 1951. Incredible New York: High Life and Low Life of the Last Hundred Years (New York)Google Scholar
Mottram, E. 1971. ‘The hostile environment and the survival artist: a note on the twenties’, in The American Novel in the Nineteen Twenties, ed. Bradbury, M. and Palmer, D. (London), PP. 233–62Google Scholar
Mumford, L. 1957. The Golden Day: A Study in American Literature and Culture (Boston; first published 1926)Google Scholar
Mumford, L. 1982. Sketches from Life: The Autobiography of Lewis Mumford – The Early Years (New York)Google Scholar
Parker, D. 1973. The Collected Dorothy Parker, ed. Gill, B. (London)Google Scholar
Perry, H. D. 1983. Libby Holman: Body and Soul (Boston)Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. 1935. Our Times: The United States, 1900–1925, vol. 6 (New York)Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, M. 1976. The Statue of Liberty (London)Google Scholar