Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T16:56:43.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Teach you to rock’? Popular music in the university music department

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Alf Björnberg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the last decades in most Western countries music education on all levels has undergone significant changes. In response to changes in the musical field in society at large, various popular music styles, previously almost totally neglected in institutional forms of music teaching based on Western art music, have been given increasing significance in the curricula of music education. This development has not, however, taken place without controversies. In most popular music genres the theoretical framework, learning principles and aims of musical practices differ in significant respects from those of the regulated activities of traditional institutions of music education, and the successful integration of popular genres into such institutions requires that these differences be acknowledged and resolved rather than ignored.

Type
Articles
Information
Popular Music , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 69 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Björnberg, A. 1991. Analyse af populœrmusik; teorier og metoder (Popular music analysis: theories and methods) (Aalborg)Google Scholar
Brooks, W. 1982. ‘On being tasteless’, Popular Music, 2, pp. 9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, H. S. 1983. ‘Notation and identity in contemporary popular music’, Popular Music, 3, pp. 215–34Google Scholar
Fornäs, J., Lindberg, U. and Sernhede, O. 1988. Under rocken – Musikens roll i tre unga band (Under the surface of rock – the role of music in three young bands) (Stockholm & Lund)Google Scholar
Haastrup, B., Hansen, I. B., Nielsen, P. C. and Simonsen, K. 1985. Rytmisk improvisatorisk musik (Rhythmic improvisatory music) (Copenhagen)Google Scholar
Hartwich-Wiechell, D. 1974. Pop-Musik. Analysen und Interpretationen (Cologne)Google Scholar
Helms, S. 1981. Musik in der Werbung (Wiesbaden)Google Scholar
Jespersen, H. T. (ed.) 1988. Man skal høre meget. Musikaliteten i fokus – en bog om lœrere og undervisning (There is a lot to hear. Musicality in focus – a book on teachers and teaching) (Copenhagen)Google Scholar
Middleton, R. 1983. ‘“Play it again, Sam”: some notes on the productivity of repetition in popular music’, Popular Music, 3, pp. 235–70Google Scholar
Middleton, R. 1990. Studying popular music (Milton Keynes & Philadelphia)Google Scholar
Olsson, B. 1989. ‘Reproduktion eller självuttryck?’ (‘Reproduction or self-expression?’), Musikpedagogiska strategier i ett föränderligt samhälle. Rapport från musikpedagogisk forskarkonferens vid Musikhögskolan i Gothenburg 10–13 april 1989 (Gothenburg), pp. 74–87Google Scholar
Pedersen, P. K. 1990. Forskning og studier i populœrmusik ved danske universiteter (Research and studies on popular music at Danish universities), Working Papers from IASPM-Nordic Branch no. DK-2 (Gothenburg)Google Scholar
Straarup, O. 1982. ‘Popular music research: needs and uses in education’, Popular Music Perspectives, ed. Tagg, P. and Horn, D. (Gothenburg and Exeter), pp. 246–8Google Scholar
Tagg, P. 1979. Kojak – 50 Seconds of Television Music: Toward the Analysis of Affect in Popular Music (Gothenburg)Google Scholar
Tagg, P. 1982. ‘Music teacher training problems and popular music research’, Popular Music Perspectives, ed. Tagg, P. and Horn, D. (Gothenburg and Exeter), pp. 232–42Google Scholar