Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:14:23.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Syncopation in rock: a perceptual perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2008

David Temperley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

While study of the social and cultural aspects of popular music has been flourishing for some time, it is only in the last few years that serious efforts have been made to analyse the music itself: what Allan Moore has called ‘the primary text’ (1993, p. 1). These efforts include general studies of styles and genres (Moore, 1993; Bowman, 1995); studies of specific aspects of popular styles such as harmony and improvisation (Winkler 1978; Moore 1992, 1995; Walser 1992), as well as more intensive analyses of individual songs (Tagg 1982; Hawkins 1992). In this paper I will investigate syncopation, a phenomenon of great importance in many genres of popular music and particularly in rock.

Type
Articles
Information
Popular Music , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 1999 , pp. 19 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agawu, K. 1995. African Rhythm (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Bowman, R. 1995. ‘The Stax sound: musicological analysis’, Popular Music, 14, pp. 285–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernoff, J.M. 1979. African Rhythm and African Sensibility (Chicago)Google Scholar
Deliege, I. 1987. ‘Grouping conditions in listening to music: an approach to Lerdahl and Jackendoff's grouping preference rules’, Music Perception, 4, pp. 325–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dogil, G. 1984. ‘On the evaluation measure for prosodic phonology’, Linguistics, 22, pp. 281–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowling, W.J. 1978. ‘Scale and contour: two components of a theory of memory for melodies’, Psychological Review, 85, pp. 341–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garman, M. 1988. Psycholinguistics (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Halle, J. and Lerdahl, F. 1993. ‘A generative text-setting model’, Current Musicology, 55, pp. 3–23Google Scholar
Hawkins, S. 1992. ‘Prince: harmonic analysis of Anna Stesia’, Popular Music, 11, pp. 325–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komar, A.J. 1971. Theory of Suspensions (Princeton, NJ)Google Scholar
Krumhansl, C.L. 1979. ‘The psychological representation of musical pitch in a tonal context’, Cognitive Psychology, 11, pp. 346–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krumhansl, C.L. 1990. Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch (New York)Google Scholar
Lerdahl, F. 1988. ‘Tonal pitch space’, Music Perception, 5, pp. 315–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerdahl, F. and Jackendoff, R. 1983. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music (Cambridge, MA)Google Scholar
Lester, J. 1986. The Rhythms of Tonal Music (Carbondale, IL)Google Scholar
Meyer, L.B. 1973. Explaining Music (Berkeley, CA)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, R. 1990. Studying Popular Music (Milton Keynes)Google Scholar
Moore, A. 1992. ‘Patterns of harmony’. Popular Music, 11, pp. 73–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. 1993. Rock: The Primary Text (Buckingham)Google Scholar
Moore, A. 1995. ‘The so-called “flattened seventh” in rock’, Popular Music, 14, pp. 185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narmour, E. 1990. The Analysis and Cognition of Basic Melodic Structures: The Implication–Realization Model (Chicago)Google Scholar
Nketia, J.H.K. 1974. The Music of Africa (New York)Google Scholar
Palmer, C. and Krumhansl, C.L. 1987. ‘Pitch and temporal contributions to musical phrase perception: effects of harmony, performance timing, and familiarity’. Perception & Psychophysics, 41 pp. 505–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parncutt, R. 1994. ‘A perceptual model of pulse salience and metrical accent in musical rhythms’, Music Perception, 11, pp. 409–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, J. 1996. ‘Turning the analysis around: African-derived rhythms and Europe-derived music theory’, Black Music Research Journal, 16, pp. 71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosner, B.S. and Meyer, L.B. 1986. ‘The perceptual roles of melodic process, contour, and form’, Music Perception, 4, pp. 1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, C. 1980. ‘Rhythm and linear analysis: durational reduction’, in The Music Forum 4, ed. Salzer, F. (New York)Google Scholar
Shepherd, J. 1982. ‘A theoretical model for the socio-musicological analysis of popular musics’, Popular Music, 2, pp. 145–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagg, P. 1982. ‘Analysing popular music: theory, method, and practice’, Popular. Music, 2, pp. 37–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temperley, D. 1997. ‘An algorithm for harmonic analysis’, Music Perception, 15, pp. 31–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walser, R. 1992. ‘Eruptions: heavy metal appropriations of classical virtuosity’, Popular Music, 11, pp. 263–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, P. 1978. ‘Towards a theory of pop harmony.’ In Theory Only, 4, pp. 3–26Google Scholar