Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:16:10.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Stax sound: a musicological analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Rob Bowman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent times there has been an encouraging increase in the musicological study of Western popular music by members of the academy. Both Richard Middleton and Alan Moore have published important books that are emphatic about the need for such study (Middleton 1990; Moore 1993). Also there have been a number of articles in a variety of journals over the past several years that have either addressed the need for, suggested various approaches to, or actually taken a musicological approach to one or another aspect of popular music (Foret 1991; Brackett 1992; Hawkins 1992; Moore 1992; Taylor 1992; Walser 1992; Middleton 1993). Despite this flurry of activity, as far as this author is aware, there has been no academic musicological work, other than Robert Walser's recent study of heavy metal (Walser 1993), that has attempted to ferret out the component parts of a given genre through an analysis of a sizable body of repertoire. There is an acute need for such work if popular music scholars are going to begin to understand in concrete terms what is meant by terms such as rock, soul, funk, Merseybeat and so on. This essay is an attempt to begin such a study for the genre of southern soul music as it was manifested by Stax Records in Memphis, Tennessee.

Type
Articles
Information
Popular Music , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , October 1995 , pp. 285 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brackett, D. 1992. ‘James Brown's “Superbad” and the double-voiced utterance’, Popular Music, 11/3, pp. 309–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foret, M. 1991. ‘Some theoretical-methodological problems on the research on popular music’, Popular Music, 10/3, pp. 31–40Google Scholar
Guralnick, P. 1986. Sweet Soul Music (New York)Google Scholar
Hawkins, S. 1992. ‘Prince: harmonic analysis of “Anna Stesia”’, Popular Music, 11/3, pp. 325–36Google Scholar
Hoskyns, B. 1987. Say It One Time for the Broken Hearted: The Country Side of Southern Soul (Glasgow)Google Scholar
Middleton, R. 1990. Studying Popular Music (Milton Keynes)Google Scholar
Middleton, R. 1993. ‘Popular music analysis and musicology: bridging the gap’, Popular Music, 12/2, pp. 177–90Google Scholar
Miller, J. (ed.) 1980. The Rolling Stone Illustrated History of Rock and Roll (New York)Google Scholar
Moore, A. 1992. ‘Patterns of harmony’, Popular Music, 11/1, pp. 73–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. 1993. Rock: The Primary Text: Developing a Musicology of Rock (Milton Keynes)Google Scholar
Taylor, T. 1992. ‘His name was in lights: Chuck Berry's “Johnny B. Goode”’, Popular Music, 11/1, pp. 37–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walser, R. 1992. ‘Eruptions: heavy metal appropriations of classical virtuosity’, Popular Music, 11/3, pp. 263–308Google Scholar
Walser, R. 1993. Running With the Devil: Power, Gender and Madness in Heavy Metal Music (Hanover, N. H.)Google Scholar
Wittet, B. 1987. ‘Al Jackson: Memphis backbeat’, Modern Drummer, 96, pp. 22–7, 84–8, 90, 92, 94, 96Google Scholar