Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:19:34.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radio space and industrial time: music formats, local narratives and technological mediation1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Jody Berland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Radio is commonly referred to as a ‘secondary medium’ in the broadcasting industry. The phrase conveys the industry's pragmatic view that no one cares whether you listen to radio so long as you do not turn it off. Since it has been displaced by television, radio is expected to accommodate itself technologically and discursively to every situation. Are you brushing your teeth, turning the corner, buying or selling jeans or entering inventory into the computer? So much the better. Your broadcaster respects the fact that these important activities must come first. Radio is humble and friendly, it follows you everywhere. In any event, television makes more money.

Type
Research Article
Information
Popular Music , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , May 1990 , pp. 179 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Attali, Jacques 1985. Noise: The Political Economy of Music (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press)Google Scholar
Babe, Robert 1985. A Study of Radio: Economic/Financial Profile of Private Sector Radio Broadcasting in Canada, prepared for Task Force on Broadcasting Policy, Department of Communications, OttawaGoogle Scholar
Barnard, Stephen 1989. On the Radio: Music Radio in Britain (Milton Keynes: Open University Press)Google Scholar
Barnes, Ken 1988. ‘Top 40: A fragment of the imagination’, in Facing the Music, ed. Frith, Simon (New York: Pantheon)Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland 1977. Image-Music-Text Ed. and trans. Heath, Stephen (Glasgow: Fontana/William Collins)Google Scholar
BBM (Bureau of Broadcast Measurement) 1986. A Review of Trends in Canadian Radio Listening 1976–1985, OttawaGoogle Scholar
Bergeron, Denis, Chater, Brian and Roberts, John 1986. Music and the Electronic Media in Canada, Study for the Task Force on Broadcasting Policy, OttawaGoogle Scholar
Berland, Jody 1988. ‘Locating listening: popular music, technological space, Canadian mediations’, Cultural Studies, 2(3) pp. 343–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berland, Jody (in press) Sound, image and social space: music video and media reconstruction', in Sound and Vision: the Music Television Reader, ed. Frith, S., Goodwin, A. and Grossberg, L. (New York Unwin Hyman)Google Scholar
Carey, James 1975. ‘Canadian communication theory: extensions and interpretations of Harold Innis’, in Studies in Canadian Communications, ed. Robinson, G. J. and Theall, D. F. (Montreal: McGill Programme in Communications)Google Scholar
CRTC (Canadian Radio and Telecommunications Commission) 1987. Listening Trends 1976–1986. Mary Giordano, Broadcasting Directorate, Radio Policy Planning and Analysis Branch, OttawaGoogle Scholar
Crane, Jonathon 1986. ‘Mainstream music and the masses’, Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10(3) pp. 66–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisell, Andrew 1986. Understanding Radio (London: Methuen)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornatale, P. and Mills, J. 1980. Radio in the Television Age (Woodstock, NY: Overlook)Google Scholar
Glasser, Theodor 1984. ‘Competition and diversity among radio formats: Legal and structural issues’, Journal of Broadcasting, 28, pp. 122–42Google Scholar
Hahn, Richard 1985. A Study of the Supply of English Language Sound Recordings to Canadian Private Radio Stations, Study for the Task Force on Broadcasting Policy, OttawaGoogle Scholar
Hennion, Antoine and Meadel, Cecile 1986. ‘Programming music: radio as mediator’, Media Culture & Society, 8(3), pp. 281–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innis, Harold 1950. Empire and Communications (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S. and Jones, K. 1978. Modern Radio Station Practices (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth)Google Scholar
Léfèbvre, Henri 1976. The Survival of Capitalism: Reproductions of the Relations of Production (London: Allison and Busby)Google Scholar
Liska, Peter 1988. ‘Digital broadcast radio’, Broadcaster, 07Google Scholar
Massey, Doreen 1984. Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production (London: Macmillan)Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Harold 1979. ‘Listening to radio’, in Intermedia: Interpersonal Communication in a Media World, ed. Gumpert, Gary and Cathcart, Robert (New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Mietkiewicz, Henry 1985. ‘Radio a gamble for all except high rollers’, Toronto Star, 24 08Google Scholar
Mietkiewicz, Henry 1986. ‘Younger listeners turn to FM radio in latest ratings’, Toronto Star, 18 02Google Scholar
Report of the Task Force on Broadcasting Policy 1986 (Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services)Google Scholar
Rothenbuhler, Eric 1987. ‘Commercial radio and popular music: processes of selection and factors of influence’, Popular Music and Communication, ed. Lull, James (Beverly Hills: Sage)Google Scholar
Straw, Will 1988. ‘Music video in its contexts: popular music and post-modernism in the 1980s’, Popular Music, 7(3), pp. 247–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toronto Star 1988. ‘Spinning too much Top 40 lands CKFM in hot water’, 14 04, B1Google Scholar
Toushek, Gary and Unger, M. 1988. ‘Helping radio programmers: a computer system to handle the routine but vital tasks’, Broadcaster, 09Google Scholar