Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:08:35.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radio broadcasting in Canada: the case of ‘transformat’ music

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Extract

What do Michel Rivard's ‘Un trou dans les nuages’ and Marjo's ‘Les chats sauvages’ have in common? Both songs were released in 1987 by two well-known French-speaking Québécois artists; they sold over 500,000 copies each and remained on the Top-Ten chart of Radio-Activité for over seventy weeks. These songs were played repeatedly on AM and FM radio stations in Quebec. However, unlike most other hits, Rivard's middle of the road (MOR) ballad was even heard on dance-music radios and Marjo's slow-beat rock appeared on the regular playlist of stations devoted primarily to easy-listening music! In fact, these songs are two examples of ‘transformat’ radio music, that is songs that get airplay on various stations which according to their respective operating license, should specialise in different musical genres and display contrasting programming styles. Using examples drawn from an exploratory study of radio music in private (commercial) FM stations in the Eastern Townships (Québec), this article will address some of the issues raised by transformat music. After a brief analytical portrait of Canada's radio policies and format regulations, I shall examine contrasting explanations of this phenomenon which focus on genre/style, state policy and business/industry. In the closing section, I shall present outlines of an alternative approach which rests upon the acknowledgement of the specific contribution of radio to the social production of popular music and addresses transformats as the outcome of creative repetition broadcasting devices.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, B. and Hesbacher, P. 1979. ‘Country and soul hits: manufacturer strategies and crossover characteristics’, Popular Music and Society, 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berland, Jody 1987. ‘Regulating Differences: Music, Radio and the regulatory Double Bind’, Rolling Notes, IASPM – Canada working papersGoogle Scholar
Frith, S. 1987. ‘The industrialisation of popular music’, in Popular Music and Communication, ed. Lull, James (London: Sage)Google Scholar
Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunication Commission 1984. Public Notice 19841984, Ottawa. Ensure a Varied and Comprehensive Radio Service', OttawaGoogle Scholar
Glasser, T. L. 1984. ‘Competition and diversity among radio formats: legal and structural issues’, Journal of Broadcasting, 2 (Spring)Google Scholar
Government of Canada 1986. Report of the Task Force on Broadcasting Policy (Caplan-Sauvageau Report), Ministry of Supplies and ServicesGoogle Scholar
Hennion, A. 1988. Comment la musique vient aux enfants. Une anthropologie de l'enseignement (Paris: Anthropos)Google Scholar
Hennion, A. and Meadel, C. 1986. ‘Programming music: radio as mediator’, Media, Culture and Society, 8Google Scholar
Hesbacher, P., Simon, E., Anderson, B. and Berger, D. G. 1978. ‘“Substream” recordings: some shifts in stature and alterations in song’, Popular Music and Society, 6Google Scholar
Jensen, J. 1986. ‘Production de la culture: une critique de la litterature anglo-saxonne sur les medias’, Vibrations, 3Google Scholar
Middleton, Richard 1983. ‘Play it again Sam: some notes on the productivity of repetition in popular music’, Popular Music, Vol. 3 (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Randel, , Michael, Don 1978. Concise Dictionary of Music (Harvard)Google Scholar
Rothenbuhler, Eric W. 1987. ‘Commercial radio and popular music: processes of selection and factors of influence’, in Popular Music and Communication, ed. Lull, James (London: Sage)Google Scholar