Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:44:47.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The logic of distinctions in the Hungarian jazz field: a case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2021

Ádám Havas Open the ORCID record for Ádám Havas [Opens in a new window]
Ádám Havas*
Affiliation:
Milestone Institute (Head of Social Sciences Division), Budapest, Hungary
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aims to make the contemporary Hungarian jazz field the focus of a sociological investigation, based on a critical reinterpretation of Bourdieu's relational theory of artistic fields. It aims to grasp the logic of symbolic distinctions by analysing the free/mainstream dichotomy. This dichotomy of historically constituted poles is understood as a system of structuring oppositions that play a decisive role in the position-takings and prestige-construction of jazz musicians. The analysis of qualitative data shows how different evaluations and interpretations of shared musical references are instrumentalised in order to occupy positions in the field. Further, this article argues that such a qualitative analysis of local jazz fields transcends the national context, since culturally hybrid jazz diasporas offer an excellent terrain for analysing how the circulation of transnational artistic references influences the cultural dynamism of local fields that are embedded within global networks of cultural production.

Type
Article
Information
Popular Music , Volume 39 , Issue 3-4 , December 2020 , pp. 619 - 635
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, W. 2011. ‘The context and genesis of musical tastes: omnivorousness debunked, Bourdieu buttressed’, Poetics, 39/3, pp. 169–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, W. 2012. ‘Where now for Bourdieu-inspired sociology?’, Sociology, 46/1, pp. 167–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, M. 2012. ‘MacIntyre, Bourdieu and the practice of jazz’, Popular Music, 31/1, pp. 69–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barna, E., and Tófalvy, T. (eds.) 2017. Made in Hungary: Studies in Popular Music (New York, Routledge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, H.S. 1951. ‘The professional dance musician and his audience’, American Journal of Sociology, 57/2, pp. 136–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, H.S. 1982. Art Worlds (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press)Google Scholar
Becker, H.S., and Faulkner, R.R. 2009. ‘Do You Know …?’ The Jazz Repertoire in Action (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Bennett, T. 2005. ‘The historical universal: the role of cultural value in the historical sociology of Pierre Bourdieu’, British Journal of Sociology, 56/1, pp. 141–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Born, G. 2010. ‘The social and the aesthetic: for a Post-Bourdieuian theory of cultural production’, Cultural Sociology, 4/2, pp. 171–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul)Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production (New York, Columbia University Press)Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1996. The Rules of Art (Stanford, Stanford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 2003. ‘Participant objectification’, Journal of the Royal Anthropology Institute (N.S.), 9, pp. 281–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (Chicago, IL, Chicago University Press)Google Scholar
Brown, J. 2000. ‘Bartók, the Gypsies, and hybridity in music’, in Western Music and Its Others: Difference, representation and Appropriation in Music, ed. Hesmondhalgh, D. and Born, G. (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press), pp. 119–43Google Scholar
Bryson, B. 1996. ‘Anything but heavy metal: symbolic exclusion and musical tastes’, American Sociological Review, 61, pp. 884–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buscatto, M. 2007. ‘Contributions of ethnography to gendered sociology: the French jazz world’, Qualitative Sociology Review, 3/3, pp. 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, T.W., and Goldthorpe, J.H. 2007. ‘Social stratification and cultural consumption: music in England’, European Sociological Review, 23, pp. 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boise, S. 2016. ‘Post-Bourdieusian moments and methods in music sociology: toward a critical, practice-based approach’, Cultural Sociology, 10/2, pp. 178–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De La Fuente, E. 2007. ‘The “new sociology of art”: putting art back into social science approaches to the arts’, Cultural Sociology, 1/3, pp. 409–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De La Fuente, E. 2010. ‘The artwork made me do it: introduction to the new sociology of art’, Thesis Eleven, 103/1, pp. 3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNora, T. 2000. Music in Everyday Life (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNora, T. 2004. ‘Historical perspectives in music sociology’, Poetics, 32, pp. 211–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVeaux, S. 1991. ‘Constructing the jazz tradition: jazz historiography’, Black American Literature Forum, 25/3, pp. 525–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVeaux, S. 1997. The Birth of Bebop. A Social and Musical History (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferranti, H.D. 2002. ‘“Japanese music” can be popular’, Popular Music, 21/2, pp. 195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, B.G., and Strauss, A.L. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Chicago, IL, Aldine)Google Scholar
Havadi, G. 2011. ‘Doktrinerizmus, privilégiumok és szankciók a zenei életben’, in Zenei Hálózatok, ed. Tófalvy, T. et al. (Budapest, L'Harmattan), pp. 129–58Google Scholar
Hennion, A. 2007. ‘Those things that hold us together: taste and sociology’, Cultural Sociology, 1/1, pp. 97–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennion, A. 2014. ‘“Blowing in the wind”? … A response to the author of “Mastering the jazz standard: Sayings and doings of artistic valuation”’, American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 2014/2, pp. 253–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesmondhalgh, D. 2006. ‘Bourdieu, the media, and cultural production’, Media Culture and Society, 28/2, pp. 211–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, L.M. 2013. Redefining Hungarian Music from Liszt to Bartók (New York, Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. 2000. The Inaudible Music: Jazz, Gender and Australian Modernity (Sydney, Currency Press)Google Scholar
Johnson, B. 2002. ‘Jazz as cultural practice’, in The Cambridge Companion to Jazz, ed. Cooke, M. and Horn, D. (New York, Cambridge University Press), pp. 96–113Google Scholar
Johnson, V. et al. 2007. Opera and Society in Italy and France from Monteverdi to Bourdieu (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirschbaum, C. 2007. ‘Careers in the right beat: US jazz musicians’ typical and non-typical trajectories’, Career Development International, 12/2, pp. 187–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, M. 2007. Gender and the Music Industry (Aldershot, Ashgate)Google Scholar
Lopes, P. 2000. ‘Pierre Bourdieu's fields of cultural production: a case study of modern jazz’, in Pierre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in Culture, Brown, N., and Szeman, I. (eds) (Oxford, Roman and Littlefield)Google Scholar
Lopes, P. 2002. The Rise of a Jazz Art World (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marković, A. 2015. ‘“So that we look more gypsy”: strategic performances and ambivalent discourses of Romani brass for the world music scene’, Ethnomusicology Forum, 24/2, pp. 260–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, L. 2014. ‘Don't play it again, Sam’, American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 2014/2, pp. 260–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nylander, E. 2014. ‘Mastering the jazz standard: sayings and doings of artistic valuation’, American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 2014/2, pp. 66–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, R.A., and Simkus, A. 1992. ‘How musical tastes mark occupational status groups’, in Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, ed. Lamont, M. and Fournier, M. (Chicago, University of Chicago Press), pp. 152–86Google Scholar
Prior, N. 2008. ‘Putting a glitch in the field: Bourdieu, actor network theory and contemporary music’, Cultural Sociology, 2/3, pp. 301–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, N. 2011. ‘Critique and renewal in the sociology of music: Bourdieu and beyond’, Cultural Sociology, 5/1, pp. 121–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, N. 2013. ‘Bourdieu and the sociology of music consumption: a critical assessment of recent developments’, Sociology Compass, 7/3, pp. 181–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santoro, M. 2013. ‘Putting circuits into fields, or how Italian canzone gained the status of “art” in the music market’, European Societies, 15/2, pp. 229–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, M., and Silva, E.B. 2013. ‘Field analysis in cultural sociology’, Cultural Sociology 7/2, pp. 111–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, D.E. 2006. Bartók, Hungary, and the Renewal of Tradition: Case Studies in the Intersection of Modernity and Nationality (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterne, J. 2003. ‘Bourdieu, technique and technology’, Cultural Studies, 17/3–4, pp. 367–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimmer, M. 2012. ‘Beyond omnivores and univores: the promise of a concept of musical habitus’, Cultural Sociology, 6/3, pp. 299–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, S. 1995. Clubcultures (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Trienekens, S. 2002. ‘“Colourful” distinction: the role of ethnicity and ethnic orientation in cultural consumption’, Poetics, 30, pp. 281–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umney, Ch., and Kretsos, L. 2015. ‘That's the experience. Passion, work precarity, and life transitions among London jazz musicians’, Work Employment & Society, 42/3, pp. 313–34Google Scholar
Varriale, S. 2015. ‘Cultural production and the morality of markets: popular music critics and the conversion of economic power into symbolic capital’, Poetics, 51, pp. 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipernovszky, K. 2015. ‘“Who will win – the jazz or gypsy, it is hard to tell”. Gypsy musicians defend Hungarian national culture against American jazz’, Americana. E-Journal of American Studies in Hungary, 10/2. http://americanaejournal.hu/vol10jazz/zipernovszkyGoogle Scholar