Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:35:13.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wanting Women Isn't New; Getting Them Is—Very

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Laura Betzig
Laura Betzig*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, USA
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Roundtable Commentaries
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 24 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Betzig, L.L. (1982). “Despotism and Differential Reproduction: A Cross-Cultural Correlation of Conflict Asymmetry, Degree of Polygyny, and Hierarchy.” Ethology and Sociobiology 3:209–21.Google Scholar
Betzig, L.L. (1986). Despotism and Differential Reproduction: A Darwinian View of History. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Betzig, L. L. (1992). “Roman Polygyny.” Ethology and Sociobiology 13:309–49.Google Scholar
Betzig, L.L. (1994). “The Point of Politics.” Analyse and Kritik 16:20–37.Google Scholar
Betzig, L.L. (1995a). “British Polygyny.” In preparation.Google Scholar
Betzig, L.L. (1995b). “Life in Groups: Social and Ecological Constraints on Insects, Birds, Mammals and ‘Men.”’ Under review.Google Scholar
Betzig, L.L. (1995c). “Medieval Monogamy.” Journal of Family History 20: in press.Google Scholar
Betzig, L.L. and Weber, S. (1993). “Polygyny in American Politics.” Politics and the Life Sciences 12:45–52.Google Scholar
Betzig, L.L. and Weber, S. (1995). “Presidents Preferred Sons.” Politics and the Life Sciences 14: 61–64.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. (1940). Feudal Society. Translated byManyon, L. A.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Brown, J. (1987). Cooperative Breeding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Emlen, S.T. (1991). “Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds and Mammals.” In Krebs, J. and Davies, N.B, (eds.), Behavioural Ecology. Third edition. London: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Pruett-Jones, S. and Lewis, M. (1990). “Habitat Limitation and Sex Ratio Promote Delayed Dispersal in Superb Fairy-Wrens.” Nature 348:541–42.Google Scholar
Reeve, H.K. and Ratneiks, F.L.W. (1993). “Queen-Queen Conflicts in Polygynous Societies: Mutual Tolerance and Reproductive Skew.” In Keller, L., (ed.), Queen Number and Sociality in Insects. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sherman, P., Jarvis, J., and Alexander, R.D. (1991). The Biology of the Naked Mole-Rat. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1939). The Roman Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vehrencamp, S.L. (1983). “A Model for the Evolution of Despotic Versus Egalitarian Societies.” Animal Behaviour 31:667–82.Google Scholar