Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:06:34.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Plea for Less Attention to Monkeys and Apes, and More to Human Biology and Evolutionary Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Alice S. Rossi
Alice S. Rossi*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts—Amherst, USA
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Roundtable Commentaries
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , August 1995 , pp. 185 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, J.M.(1995). “Paradoxical Strife: Science and Society.” Bulletin XLVIII:10–30. Cambridge, MA: The American Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Buss, D.(1989a). “Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D.(1989b). “Conflict between the Sexes: Strategic Interference and the Evocation of Anger and Upset.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56:735–47.Google Scholar
Buss, D.(1994). The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Degler, C.(1991). In Search of Human Nature: The Decline and Revival of Darwinism in American Social Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, L.A.(1992). Physical Appearance and Gender: Sociobiological and Sociocultural Perspectives. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Laumann, E.O., Gagnon, J.H., Michael, R.T., and Michaels, S.(1994). The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, F.(1994). “Sociobiology and Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 20:267–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, D.(1993). “Body Shape and Physical Attraction: The Critical Role of Waist-to-Hip Ratio.” Human Nature 4:297–321.Google Scholar
Singh, D. and Luis, S.(1995). “Ethnic and Gender Consensus for the Effect of Waist-to-Hip Ratio in Judgments of Women's Attractiveness.” Human Nature 6:51–65.Google Scholar
Symons, D.(1989a). “The Psychology of Human Mate Preferences.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:34–35.Google Scholar
Symons, D.(1989b). “A Critique of Darwinian Anthropology.” Ethology and Sociobiology 10:131–44.Google Scholar
Symons, D. and Ellis, B.(1989). “Human Male-Female Differences in Sexual Desire.” In Rasa, A.E., Vogel, C., and Voland, E.(eds.), The Sociobiology of Sexual and Reproductive Strategies. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O.(1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O.(1978). On Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Wright, R.(1994). The Moral Animal: Evolutionary Psychology and Everyday Life. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Zuk, M.(1990). “Reproductive Strategies and Disease Susceptibility: An Evolutionary Viewpoint.” Parasitology Today 6:231–33.Google Scholar