Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:29:04.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminism and the Politics of Reproductive Strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Laurette T. Liesen
Laurette T. Liesen*
Affiliation:
Loyola University of Chicago, USA
Get access

Abstract

Feminists have often been among the most outspoken critics of sociobiology, maintaining that sociobiology is inherently sexist and that it is used to uphold patriarchy. This article examines the latest research by scholars—many of them women—who have used a sociobiological approach to expand our understanding of female behavior. It shows that sociobiology recognizes complexity in human reproductive behavior and that members of both sexes employ a variety of reproductive strategies, depending upon their environments. Women are not necessarily sexually passive within the sociobiological paradigm, and they are not “naturally” parents; moreover, men clearly play a necessary and significant role in parenting. Women do have reproductive interests that are separate from those of men, and these interests clash. Despite these conflicts of reproductive interest, however, men and women can develop cooperative relationships to achieve their mutual goal of raising children to maturity. Patriarchy is not—within the sociobiological paradigm—a natural order between males and females. Sociobiology also does not suggest that women should be restricted to parenting roles; indeed, sociobiological research can provide the basis for greater freedom for both men and women in reproduction and resource acquisition.

Type
Roundtable Article
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , August 1995 , pp. 145 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnhart, L.(1992). “Feminism, Primatology, and Ethical Naturalism” [with commentaries and response]. Politics and the Life Sciences 11:157–77.Google Scholar
Babchuk, W.A., Hames, R.B., and Thompson, R.A.(1985). “Sex Differences in the Recognition of Infant Facial Expressions of Emotion: The Primary Caretaker Hypothesis.” Ethology and Sociobiology 6:89–101.Google Scholar
Baker, R.R. and Bellis, M.A.(1993a). “Human Sperm Competition: Ejaculate Adjustment by Males and the Function of Masturbation.” Animal Behaviour 46:861–85.Google Scholar
Baker, R.R. and Bellis, M.A.(1993b). “Human Sperm Competition: Ejaculate Manipulation by Females and a Function for the Female Orgasm.” Animal Behaviour 46:887–909.Google Scholar
Barash, D.P.(1982). Sociobiology and Behavior. Second edition. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing.Google Scholar
Bateman, A.J.(1948). “Intra-Sexual Selection in Drosophila.” Heredity 2:349–68.Google Scholar
Batten, M.(1992). Sexual Strategies: How Females Choose Their Mates. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
Betzig, L.(1988). “Mating and Parenting in Darwinian Perspective.” In Betzig, L., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., and Turke, P.(eds.), Human Reproductive Behavior: A Darwinian Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Betzig, L.L.(1992). “Of Human Bonding: Cooperation or Exploitation?” Social Science Information 31:611–42.Google Scholar
Betzig, L.(1993). “Sex, Succession, and Stratification in the First Six Civilizations: How Powerful Men Reproduced, Passed Power onto Their Sons, and Used Power to Defend Their Wealth, Women, and Children.” In Ellis, L.(ed.), Social Stratification and Socioeconomic Inequality, Volume 1: A Comparative Biosocial Analysis. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Bleier, R.(1984). Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bleier, R.(1985). “Biology and Women's Policy: A View from the Biological Sciences.” In Sapiro, V.(ed.), Women, Biology, and Public Policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Buss, D.M.(1989). “Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:1–49.Google Scholar
Buss, D.M.(1994). The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Chisholm, J.S.(1993). “Death, Hope, and Sex: Life-History Theory and the Development of Reproductive Strategies.” Current Anthropology 34:1–24.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H.(1991). The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cronin, H.(1991). The Ant and the Peacock: Altruism and Sexual Selection from Darwin to Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, F., ed. (1981). Woman the Gatherer. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, M. and Wilson, M.(1978). Sex, Evolution, and Behavior. Boston: Willard Grant Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C.(1859). The Origin of Species. New York: Collier Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C.(1877). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R.(1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Degler, C.(1991). In Search of Human Nature: The Decline and Revival of Darwinism in American Social Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.(1989). Human Ethology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, A.(1985). Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fedigan, L.M.(1982). Primate Paradigms: Sex Roles and Social Bonds. Montreal: Eden Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, H.(1992). The Anatomy of Love: The Natural History of Monogamy, Adultery, and Divorce. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Flinn, M.V.(1992). “Paternal Care in a Caribbean Village.” In Hewlett, B.S.(ed.), Father-Child Relations: Cultural and Biosocial Contexts. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gowaty, P.(1992). “Evolutionary Biology and Feminism.” Human Nature 3:217–49.Google Scholar
Gray, J.P.(1985). Primate Sociobiology. New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files.Google Scholar
Hames, R.B.(1988). “The Allocation of Parental Care among the Ye'kwana.” In Betzig, L., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., and Turke, P.(eds.), Human Reproductive Behavior: A Darwinian Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D.(1964). “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior, I and II.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:1–52.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. and Zuk, M.(1982). “Heritable True Fitness and Bright Birds: A Role for Parasites?” Science 218:384–87.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.J.(1984). “Significance of Paternal Investment by Primates to the Evolution of Adult Male-Female Associations.” In Taub, D.M.(ed.), Primate Paternalism. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Hewlett, B.S.(1988). “Sexual Selection and Paternal Investment among Aka Pygmies.” In Betzig, L., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., and Turke, P.(eds.), Human Reproductive Behavior: A Darwinian Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hewlett, B.S.(1992). “Husband-Wife Reciprocity and the Father-Infant Relationship among Aka Pygmies.” In Hewlett, B.S.(ed.), Father-Child Relations: Cultural and Biosocial Contexts. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hill, K. and Kaplan, H.(1988). “Tradeoffs in Male and Female Reproductive Strategies among the Ache: Part 1 and Part 2.” In Betzig, L., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., and Turke, P.(eds.), Human Reproductive Behavior: A Darwinian Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S.B.(1981). The Woman That Never Evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S.B.(1986). “Empathy, Polyandry, and the Myth of the Coy Female.” In Bleier, R.(ed.), Feminist Approaches to Science. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S.B.(1992). “Fitness Tradeoffs in the History and Evolution of Delegated Mothering with Special Reference to Wet-Nursing, Abandonment, and Infanticide.” Ethology and Sociobiology 13:409–42.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S.B. and Williams, G.C.(1983). “Behavioral Biology and the Double Standard.” In Wasser, S.K.(ed.), Social Behavior of Female Vertebrates. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hubbard, R.(1990). The Politics of Women's Biology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Irons, W.(1983). “Human Female Reproductive Strategies.” In Wasser, S.K.(ed.), Social Behavior of Female Vertebrates. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Katz, M. and Konner, M.(1981). “The Role of the Father: An Anthropological Perspective.” In Lamb, M.(ed.), The Role of the Father in Child Development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Klaus, M.H. and Kennel, J.H.(1982). Parent-Infant Bonding. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Company.Google Scholar
Lamb, M.E.(1984). “Observational Studies of Father-Child Relationships in Humans.” In Taub, D.M.(ed.), Primate Paternalism. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Lancaster, J.B.(1975). Primate Behavior and the Emergence of Human Culture. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Lancaster, J.B.(1985). “Evolutionary Perspectives on Sex Differences in the Higher Primates.” In Rossi, A.S.(ed.), Gender and the Life Course. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
Lancaster, J.B.(1989). “Evolutionary and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Single-Parenthood.” In Bell, R.W. and Bell, N.J.(eds.), Sociobiology and the Social Sciences. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University Press.Google Scholar
Lancaster, J.B.(1991). “A Feminist and Evolutionary Biologist Looks at Women.” Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 34:1–11.Google Scholar
Lancaster, J.B. and Lancaster, C.S.(1983). “Parental Investment: The Hominid Adaptation.” In Ortner, D.J.(ed.), How Humans Adapt: A Biocultural Odyssey. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Laumann, E.O., Gagnon, J.H., Michael, R.T., and Michaels, S.(1994). The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Low, B.S.(1992). “Sex, Coalitions, and Politics in Preindustrial Societies.” Politics and the Life Sciences 11:63–80.Google Scholar
Lowe, M. and Hubbard, R.(1978). “Sociobiology and Biosociology: Can Science Prove the Biological Basis of Sex Differences in Behavior?” In Tobach, E. and Rosoff, B.(eds.), Genes and Gender. New York: Gordian Press.Google Scholar
Masters, R.D.(1984). “Explaining ‘Male Chauvinism’ and ‘Feminism’: Cultural Differences in Male and Female Reproductive Strategies.” In Watts, M.(ed.), Biopolitics and Gender. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Masters, R.D.(1989). The Nature of Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, R.D.(1991). “Conclusion: Primate Politics and Political Theory.” In Schubert, G. and Masters, R.D.(eds.), Primate Politics. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J.(1956). “Fertility, Mating Behavior, and Sexual Selection in Drosophila sybobscura.” Journal of Genetics 54:261–79.Google Scholar
McGrew, W.C.(1992). Chimpanzee Material Culture: Implications for Human Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, N.A.(1991). “Maternal Behavior in Human and Nonhuman Primates.” In Loy, J.D. and Peters, C.(eds.), Understanding Behavior: What Primate Studies Tell Us about Human Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parish, A.R.(1994). “Sex and Food Control in the ‘Uncommon Chimpanzee’: How Bonobo Females Overcome a Phylogenetic Legacy of Male Dominance.” Ethology and Sociobiology 15:157–79.Google Scholar
Partridge, L. and Harvey, P.H.(1992). “What the Sperm Count Costs.” Nature 360:415.Google Scholar
Perusse, D.(1993). “Cultural and Reproductive Success in Industrial Societies: Testing the Relationship at the Proximate and Ultimate Levels” [with commentaries and response]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:267–322.Google Scholar
Petrie, M.(1994). “Improved Growth and Survival of Offspring of Peacocks with More Elaborate Trains.” Nature 371:598–99.Google Scholar
Ridley, M.(1994). The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rossi, A.S.(1984). “Gender and Parenthood” [American Sociological Association, 1983 Presidential Address]. American Sociological Review 49:1–19.Google Scholar
Ruvolo, M. et al.(1991). “Resolution of the African Hominoid Trichotomy by Use of a Mitochondrial Gene Sequence.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 88:1570–74.Google Scholar
Sayers, J.(1982). Biological Politics: Feminist and Anti-Feminist Perspectives. New York: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Sherfey, M.J.(1972). The Nature and Evolution of Female Sexuality. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Small, M.F.(1988). “Female Primate Sexual Behavior and Conception: Are There Really Sperm to Spare?” [with commentaries and response]. Current Anthropology 29:81–100.Google Scholar
Small, M.F.(1992). “The Evolution of Female Sexuality and Mate Selection in Humans.” Human Nature 3:133–56.Google Scholar
Small, M.F.(1993). Female Choices: Sexual Behavior of Female Primates. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Smuts, B.B.(1985). Sex and Friendship in Baboons. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
Smuts, B.B.(1987a). “Gender, Aggression, and Influence.” In Smuts, B.B. et al. (eds.), Primate Societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smuts, B.B.(1987b). “Sexual Competition and Mate Choice.” In Smuts, B.B. et al. (eds.), Primate Societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smuts, B.B.(1992). “Male Aggression Against Women: An Evolutionary Perspective.” Human Nature 3:1–44.Google Scholar
Smuts, B.B. and Gubernick, D.J.(1992). “Male-Infant Relationships in Nonhuman Primates: Paternal Investment or Mating Effort?” In Hewlett, B.S.(ed.), Father-Child Relations: Cultural and Biosocial Contexts. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Smuts, B.B. and Smuts, R.W.(1993). “Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications.” In Slater, P.J.B.(ed.), Advances in the Study of Behavior. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tanner, N.M.(1987). “Gathering by Females: The Chimpanzee Model Revisited and the Gathering Hypothesis.” In Kinzey, W.G.(ed.), The Evolution of Human Behavior: Primate Models. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Taub, D. and Mehlman, P.(1991). “Primate Paternalistic Investment: A Cross-Species View.” In Loy, J.D. and Peters, C.(eds.), Understanding Behavior: What Primate Studies Tell Us about Human Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Travis, C.B. and Yeager, C.P.(1991) “Sexual Selection, Parental Investment, and Sexism.” Journal of Social Issues 47:117–29.Google Scholar
Trivers, R.L.(1971). “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism.” The Quarterly Review of Biology. 46:35–57.Google Scholar
Trivers, R.L.(1972). “Parental Investment and Sexual Selection.” In Campbell, B.(ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Trivers, R.L.(1985). Social Evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
Verrell, P.(1990). “When Males Are Choosey.” New Scientist (January 20):46–52.Google Scholar
Williams, G.C.(1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O.(1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, R.(1994). The Moral Animal: Evolutionary Psychology and Everyday Life. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Wood, J.W.(1994). Dynamics of Human Reproduction: Biology, Biometry, Demography. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zihlman, A.(1981). “Women as Shapers of the Human Adaptation.” In Dahlberg, F.(ed.), Woman the Gatherer. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar