Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:15:36.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who Violates The Principles of Political Liberalism?: Religion, Restraint, and the Decision to Reject Same-Sex Marriage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

Kraig Beyerlein  and
Christopher J. Eberle
Kraig Beyerlein*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
Christopher J. Eberle*
Affiliation:
United States Naval Academy
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kraig Beyerlein, Department of Sociology, 817 Flanner Hall, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: [email protected]; Christopher J. Eberle, Department of Philosophy, United States Naval Academy, 121 Blake Road, Annapolis, MD 21402. E-mail: [email protected].
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kraig Beyerlein, Department of Sociology, 817 Flanner Hall, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: [email protected]; Christopher J. Eberle, Department of Philosophy, United States Naval Academy, 121 Blake Road, Annapolis, MD 21402. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent debates in political theory have seen political liberals advocate and defend a doctrine of restraint, according to which citizens may not rely solely on religious reasons when supporting their favored public policies. This debate notwithstanding, very rarely have social scientists assessed the extent to which citizens actually violate this doctrine. This article evaluates the “political decision-making” model of political liberalism. Data from a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults are used to test this model for legalization of same-sex marriage. Our analyses show that while only a very small percentage of U.S. support this policy solely on the basis of their religious convictions, roughly a quarter oppose it for religious reasons alone. Furthermore, we find that higher levels of religious service attendance and importance of religious faith as well as affiliation with evangelical and black Protestantism significantly increase the likelihood of same-sex marriage opposition entirely on religious grounds.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 240 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrajano, Marisa. 2010. “Are Blacks and Latinos Responsible for the Passage of Proposition 8? Analyzing Voter Attitudes on California's Proposal to Ban Same-Sex Marriage in 2008.” Political Research Quarterly 63:922–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Paul. 2002. Missing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, Robert. 1993. “The Place of Religious Argument in a Free and Democratic Society.” San Diego Law Review 30:677–702.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. 1997. “Liberal Democracy and the Place of Religion in Politics.” In Religion in the Public Square: The Place of Religious Convictions in Political Debate, ed. Audi, R., and Wolterstorff, N.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. 2000. Religious Commitment and Secular Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, Robert. 2011. Democratic Authority and the Separation of Church and State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beyerlein, Kraig, and Andrews, Kenneth T.. 2008. “Black Voting During the Civil Rights Movement: A Micro-level Analysis.” Social Forces 87:65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boettcher, James. 2007. “Respect, Recognition, and Public Reason.” Social Theory and Practice 33:223–249.Google Scholar
California Secretary of State. 2008. Statement of Vote, November 4, 2008, General Election. Sacramento, CA: California Secretary of State.Google Scholar
Davis, Nancy J., and Robinson, Robert V.. 1996. “Are the Rumors of War Exaggerated? Religious Orthodoxy and Moral Progressivism in America.” American Journal of Sociology 102:756–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Gilbert, Christopher P.. 2009. The Political Influence of Churches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Donald. 1989. The New Politics of Pornography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
DuMouchel, William H., and Duncan, Greg J.. 1983. “Using Sample Survey Weights in Multiple Regression Analyses of Stratified Samples.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 78:535–543.Google Scholar
Eberle, Christopher. 2002. Religious Conviction in Liberal Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, John H. 2010. Contested Reproduction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald. 2009. “The Place of Religious Belief in Public Reason Liberalism.” In Multiculturalism and Moral Conflict, ed. Dimovia-Cookson, M., and Stirk, P.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. “Religion in the Public Sphere.” European Journal of Philosophy 14:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Fredrick. 1999. Something Within. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kellstedt, Lyman A., Green, John C., Guth, James L., and Smidt, Corwin E.. 1996. “Grasping the Essentials: The Social Embodiment of Religion and Political Behavior.” In Religion and the Culture Wars, ed. Green, J. C., Guth, J. L., Smidt, C. E., and Kellstedt, L. A.. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Langerak, Edward J. 2007. “Religion in the Public Square.” Philosophy Compass 2:129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, Charles. 1987. Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leon, Sharon M. 2004. ““A Human Being, and Not a Mere Social Factor”: Catholic Strategies for Dealing with Sterilization Statutes in the 1920s.” Church History 73:383–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menard, Scott. 1995. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2008. Liberty of Conscience: In Defense of America's Tradition of Religious Equality. New York, NY: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Olson, Laura R., Cadge, Wendy, and Harrison, James T.. 2006. “Religion and Public Opinion about Same-Sex Marriage.” Social Science Quarterly 87:340–360.Google Scholar
Perry, Michael. 1997. Religion in Politics: Constitutional and Moral Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Michael. 2003. Under God? Religious Faith and Liberal Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1994. “Religion as a Conversation-Stopper.” Common Knowledge 3:1–6.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 2003. “Religion in the Public Square: A Reconsideration.” The Journal of Religious Ethics 31:141–149.Google Scholar
Royston, Patrick. 2004. “Multiple Imputation of Missing Values.” Stata Journal 4:227–241.Google Scholar
Royston, Patrick. 2005. “Multiple Imputation of Missing Values: Update.” State Journal 5:1–14.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, Joseph L. 1997. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Schafer, Joseph L., and Graham, John W.. 2002. “Missing Data: Our View of the State of the Art.” Psychological Methods 7:147–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherkat, Darren, Powell-Williams, Melissa, Maddox, Gregory, and de Vries, Kylan Mattias. 2011. “Religion, Politics, and Support for Same-Sex Marriage in the United States, 1988–2008.” Social Science Research 40:167–180.Google Scholar
Shields, Jon A. 2009. The Democratic Virtues of the Christian Right. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Christian. 1996. Resisting Reagan. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steensland, Brian, Park, Jerry Z., Regnerus, Mark D., Robinson, Lynn D., Wilcox, W. Bradford, and Woodberry, Robert D.. 2000. “The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art.” Social Forces 79:291–318.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2011. “Why We Need a Radical Redefinition of Secularism.” In The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, ed. Mendieta, E., and Vanantwerpen, J.. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
van Buuren, Stef, Boshuizen, H.C., and Knook., D.L. 1999. “Multiple Imputation of Missing Blood Pressure Covariates in Survival Analysis.” Statistics in Medicine 18:681–694.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D., and Calhoun-Brown, Allison, eds. 2011. Religion and Politics in the United States. 6th ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Weithman, Paul. 2002. Religion and the Obligations of Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde, Brewer, Paul R., Shames, Shauna, and Lake, Celinda. 2007. “If I Bend This Far I Will Break? Public Opinion about Same-Sex Marriage.” In The Politics of Same-Sex Marriage, ed. Rimmerman, C. A., and Wilcox, C.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Winship, Christopher, and Radbill, Larry. 1994. “Sampling Weights and Regression Analysis.” Sociological Methods and Research 23:230–257.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1997. “The Role of Religion in Decision and Discussion of Political Issues.” In Religion in the Public Square: The Place of Religious Convictions in Political Debate, ed. Audi, R., and Wolterstorff, N.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Yamane, David. 2000. “Naked Public Square or Crumbling Wall of Separation? Evidence from Legislative Hearings in Wisconsin.” Review of Religious Research 42:175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamane, David. 2005. The Catholic Church in State Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
United States Election Project. 2012. “2008 General Election Turnout Rates.” http://elections.gmu.edu/Turnout_2008G.html (Accessed on March 13, 2013).Google Scholar