Article contents
Racial Limitations on the Gender, Risk, Religion, and Politics Model
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 October 2021
Abstract
Risk aversion dampens political participation and heightens religiosity, with concentrated effects among women. Yet, little is known about how intersecting identities moderate these psychological correlates of religiosity and political engagement. In this paper, we theorize that the risk-religion-politics relationship is gendered and racialized. Using a nationally representative survey, we show that political participation is more strongly correlated with risk for Black women than for any other race-gender group. For religiosity, however, we find little evidence that risk is related to religiosity among Black women, while highly correlated with white women's religious engagement. For men—whether Black or white—risk exhibits a modest, positive relationship with their religiosity. Our results speak to the importance of considering intersectionality and race-gender identities in evaluations of religious and political activities in the United States.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association
Footnotes
Thanks to Kevin den Dulk, Erin Cassese, Paul Djupe, Christopher Federico, Joseph Tucker Edmonds, and Yanna Krupnikov's class for their thoughts on the project. Previous versions of this paper were presented at the annual meetings of International Society for Political Psychology (2018) and the Southern Political Science Association (2019).
References
- 1
- Cited by