Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:19:52.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Messages from Above: Conflict and Convergence of Messages to the Catholic Voter from the Catholic Church Hierarchy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2017

Mirya R. Holman  and
Kristin Shockley
Mirya R. Holman*
Affiliation:
Tulane University
Kristin Shockley*
Affiliation:
Florida Atlantic University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Miryan R. Holman, Tulane University, Department of Political Science, Norman Mayer building, 6823 St. Charles Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70118. E-mail: [email protected]; or to Kristin Shockley, Florida Atlantic University, Department of History, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431. E-mail: [email protected].
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Miryan R. Holman, Tulane University, Department of Political Science, Norman Mayer building, 6823 St. Charles Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70118. E-mail: [email protected]; or to Kristin Shockley, Florida Atlantic University, Department of History, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Catholic Church often plays a policy and mobilization role in American politics. We assess the degree to which the Catholic Church hierarchy — including national and state conferences of bishops — can provide uniform information to parishioners about political participation. Using a textual analysis of information distributed to parishioners in Florida in the 2012 election, we evaluate how much political information is conveyed to parishioners, the sources of this information, and the factors associated with higher or lower levels of information. While we find that most parishes provided information related to the election, there is wide diversity in the types and sources of information. And, while the Catholic hierarchy attempted to provide messaging about the importance of political participation, not all parishes complied with these efforts. Our findings are consistent with the ideas that the local community and hierarchical structure combine to shape the behavior of the parishes.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 840 - 861
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Thanks to Grace Deason, Erin Cassese, Ted Jelen, Paul Djupe, Elizabeth Oldmixon, and several anonymous reviewers for their comments on the article and to Garrett Krivicich for his research assistance. This article was previously presented at the 2013 Midwest Political Science Association meeting.

References

REFERENCES

Adloff, Frank. 2006. “Religion and Social-Political Action: The Catholic Church, Catholic Charities, and the American Welfare State.” International Review of Sociology 16:1–30.Google Scholar
Baggett, Jerome P. 2006. “The Catholic Citizen: Perennial Puzzle or Emergent Oxymoron?” Social Compass 53:291–309.Google Scholar
Becker, Penny Edgell. 1999. Congregations in Conflict: Cultural Models of Local Religious Life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bjarnason, Thoroddur, and Welch, Michael R.. 2004. “Father Knows Best: Parishes, Priests, and American Catholic Parishioners’ Attitudes toward Capital Punishment.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 43:103–118.Google Scholar
Byrnes, Timothy A. 1993. “The Politics of the American Catholic Hierarchy.” Political Science Quarterly 108:497–514.Google Scholar
Cadge, Wendy, Girouard, Jennifer, Olson, Laura R., and Lylerohr, Madison. 2012. “Uncertainty in Clergy's Perspectives on Homosexuality: A Research Note.” Review of Religious Research 54:371–387.Google Scholar
Cadge, Wendy, Olson, Laura R., and Wildeman, Christopher. 2008. “How Denominational Resources Influence Debate about Homosexuality in Mainline Protestant Congregations.” Sociology of Religion 69:187–207.Google Scholar
Calfano, Brian R. 2010. “Prophetic at Any Price? Clergy Political Behavior and Utility Maximization.” Social Science Quarterly 91:649–668.Google Scholar
Calfano, Brian R., and Oldmixon, Elizabeth A.. 2015. “Primed Parsons: Reference Groups and Clergy Political Attitudes.” Journal of Religion & Society 17:1–10.Google Scholar
Calfano, Brian R., and Oldmixon, Elizabeth A.. 2016. “Remembering to Ask the Boss: Priming and the Dynamics of Priest Reliance on Bishop Cues.” Religions 7:21.Google Scholar
Calfano, Brian R., Oldmixon, Elizabeth A., and Gray, Mark. 2014. “Strategically Prophetic Priests: An Analysis of Competing Principal Influence on Clergy Political Action.” Review of Religious Research 56:1–21.Google Scholar
Calfano, Brian R., Oldmixon, Elizabeth A., and Suiter, Jane. 2014. “Who and What Affects the First Estate? An Analysis of Clergy Attitudes on Cultural and Economic Issues.” Politics 34:391–404.Google Scholar
Campbell, Marci Kramish, Bernhardt, Jay M., Waldmiller, Michael, Jackson, Bethany, Potenziani, Dave, Weathers, Benita, and Demissie, Seleshi. 1999. “Varying the Message Source in Computer-Tailored Nutrition Education.” Patient Education and Counseling 36:157–169.Google Scholar
Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate. 2011. Catholic Poll. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Cleary, Edward. 2003. “Religion at the Statehouse: The California Catholic Conference.” Journal of Church and State 45:41–58.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Gilbert, Christopher P.. 2002. “The Political Voice of Clergy.” The Journal of Politics 64:596–609.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Olson, Laura R.. 2010. “Diffusion of Environmental Concerns in Congregations across U.S. States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10:270–301.Google Scholar
The Fordham Center on Religion and Culture. 2011. “Faithful Citizenship I: Voters, Bishops, and Presidential Elections.” www.digital.library.fordham.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/rc/id/56 (Accessed on March 31, 2014).Google Scholar
Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops. 2012. Voting Smart. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops. www.flaccb.org/statements/2012/121005VotingStmt.pdf (Accessed on March 31, 2014).Google Scholar
Halloran, Deirdre Dessingue, and Kearney, Kevin M. 1998. “Federal Tax Code Restrictions on Church Political Activity.” Catholic University Law Review 38:105.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, John P., Lott, Bruce R., and Jeppsen, Catherine. 2010. “Religious Giving and the Boundedness of Rationality.” Sociology of Religion 71:323–348.Google Scholar
Hofstetter, C. Richard, Ayers, John W., and Perry, Robert. 2008. “The Bishops and their Flock: John Kerry and the Case of Catholic Voters in 2004.” Politics and Religion 1:436–455.Google Scholar
Jelen, Ted G. 2003. “Catholic Priests and the Political Order: The Political Behavior of Catholic Pastors.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42:591–604.Google Scholar
Jelen, Ted G. 2006. “The American Church: Of Being Catholic and American.” In The Catholic Church and the Nation-State: Comparative Perspectives, eds. Manuel, Paul Christopher, Reardon, Lawrence C., and Wilcox, Clyde. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Manetta, Ameda A., Bryant, Dianne F., Cavanaugh, Teresa, and Gange, Tracy-Ann. 2003. “The Church-Does It Provide Support for Abused Women? Differences in the Perceptions of Battered Women and Parishioners.” Journal of Religion & Abuse 5:5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGreevy, John T. 1998. Parish Boundaries: The Catholic Encounter with Race in the Twentieth-Century Urban North. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Neiheisel, Jacob R., and Djupe, Paul A.. 2008. “Intra-Organizational Constraints on Churches’ Public Witness.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 47:427–441.Google Scholar
Owens, Michael Leo. 2008. God and Government in the Ghetto: The Politics of Church-State Collaboration in Black America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. 2008. “U.S. Religious Landscape Survey Religious Affiliation: Diverse and Dynamic.” www.religions.pewforum.org/pdf/report-religious-landscape-study-full.pdf (Accessed on March 31, 2014).Google Scholar
Robinson, Karen A., Dennison, Cheryl R., Wayman, Dawn M., Pronovost, Peter J., and Needham, Dale M.. 2007. “Systematic Review Identifies Number of Strategies Important for Retaining Study Participants.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60.Google Scholar
Smith, Gregory A. 2005. “The Influence of Priests on the Political Attitudes of Roman Catholics.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 44:291–306.Google Scholar
Smith, Gregory A. 2010. Politics in the Parish: The Political Influence of Catholic Priests. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. 2007. Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship: A Call to Political Responsibility from the Catholic Bishops of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.Google Scholar
Vokurka, Robert J., McDaniel, Stephen W., and Cooper, Noelle. 2002. “Church Marketing Communication Methods.” Services Marketing Quarterly 24:17–32.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D. 1992. “Religious Elites and Public Opinion: The Impact of the Bishops’ Peace Pastoral.” The Review of Politics 54:112–143.Google Scholar
Webb, Marion S., Joseph, W. Benoy, Schimmel, Kurt, and Moberg, Christopher. 1998. “Church Marketing: Strategies for Retaining and Attracting Members.” Journal of Professional Services Marketing 17:1–16.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde, Jelen, Ted G., and Leege, David C.. 1993. “Religious Group Identification: Towards a Cognitive Theory of Religious Mobilization.” In Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics, eds. Leege, David C., and Kellstedt, Lyman A.. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Yamane, David. 2005. The Catholic Church in State Politics: Negotiating Prophetic Demands and Political Realities. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Holman and Shockley supplementary material

Appendix

Download Holman and Shockley supplementary material(File)
File 16.7 KB