Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:45:54.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impossible Intersectionality? French Feminists and the Struggle for Inclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2014

Éléonore Lépinard*
Affiliation:
Université de Lausanne

Extract

The history of the origins of the concept of intersectionality is deeply embedded in the U.S. context. The intertwined histories of the American women's movements and American race relations as well as the conjunction of several theoretical strands, such as the philosophical critique of the modern subject, poststructuralism, the critique from feminists of color, and critical legal studies, have marked the genesis and the operationalization of the concept of intersectionality in American feminist studies (Ackerly and McDermott 2011, Dhamoon 2011). This legacy has given the concept of intersectionality particular analytical contents, preferred objects of inquiry, and methodologies as well as specific political aims (McCall 2005). Kimberlé Crenshaw's initial formulation of intersectionality exemplifies this U.S. genealogy since it represents a joint analytical and political effort, embedded in critical legal studies and black feminist theory, to identify and promote the political identity of African-American women or, as she writes, to “demarginalize” their political interests and to critique single axis approaches to inequality and discrimination (Crenshaw 1991). By doing so, the concept of intersectionality not only makes visible the categories and groups that were marginalized in theory and political practice, but also articulates a new set of political interests and, to a certain extent, contributes to construct and to represent intersectional identities.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerly, Brooke, and McDermott, Rose. 2011. “Recent Developments in Intersectionality Research: Expanding beyond Race and Gender.” Politics & Gender 8 (3): 367–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collectif Contre l'Islamophobie en France (CCIF). 2012. Rapport sur l'Islamophobie en France. www.islamophobie.net/sites/default/files/file_attach/rapport_2012_CCIF.pdf (accessed December 6, 2013).Google Scholar
Cole, Elizabeth R. 2008. “Coalitions as a Model for Intersectionality: From Practice to Theory.” Sex Roles, 59 (5–6): 443–53.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics and Violence Against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhamoon, Rita Kaur. 2011. “Considerations on Mainstreaming Intersectionality.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (1): 230–43.Google Scholar
El-Tayeb, Fatima. 2011. European Others. Queering Ethnicity in Postnational Europe. Mineapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lépinard, Éléonore. 2011. “Autonomy and the Crisis of the Feminist Subject: Revisiting Okin's Dilemma.” Constellations. An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 18 (2): 205–21.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2005. The Politics of Piety. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCall, Leslie. 2005. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 3 (3): 1771–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberger, Sieglinde, and Sauer, Brigit. 2011. Politics, Religion and Gender. Framing and Regulating the Veil. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan. 2007. Politics of the Veil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Barbara E. 1995. “Crossing the Great Divides. Race, Class, and Gender in Southern Women's Organizing 1979–1991.” Gender & Society 9 (6): 680–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strolovitch, Dara Z. 2007. Affirmative Advocacy. Race, Class and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira. 1997. Gender and Nation. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar