Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Kriesi, Hanspeter
2006.
Role of The Political Elite in Swiss Direct-Democratic Votes.
Party Politics,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 5,
p.
599.
Gelman, Andrew
Jakulin, Aleks
Su, Yu-Sung
and
Pittau, Maria Grazia
2007.
A Default Prior Distribution for Logistic and Other Regression Models.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
LEACHMAN, LORI L.
ROSAS, GUILLERMO
LANGE, PETER
and
BESTER, ALAN
2007.
THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF BUDGET DEFICITS.
Economics & Politics,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3,
p.
369.
Hong Lu
and
Bin Liang
2008.
Legal Responses to Trafficking in Narcotics and Other Narcotic Offenses in China.
International Criminal Justice Review,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 2,
p.
212.
Saporta, Gilbert
and
Ohannessian, Silva Silva
2008.
'Zero' Option in Conjoint Analysis: A New Specification of the Indecision and the Refusal - Application to the Video on Demand Market.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Kastellec, Jonathan P.
and
Lax, Jeffrey R.
2008.
Case Selection and the Study of Judicial Politics.
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 3,
p.
407.
Andres, Christian
and
Theissen, Erik
2008.
Setting a fox to keep the geese — Does the comply-or-explain principle work?.
Journal of Corporate Finance,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 3,
p.
289.
SMITH, DANIEL A.
and
FRIDKIN, DUSTIN
2008.
Delegating Direct Democracy: Interparty Legislative Competition and the Adoption of the Initiative in the American States.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 102,
Issue. 3,
p.
333.
Gelman, Andrew
Jakulin, Aleks
Pittau, Maria Grazia
and
Su, Yu-Sung
2008.
A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models.
The Annals of Applied Statistics,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 4,
Bhavnani, Rikhil
2008.
Do Electoral Quotas 'Work' After They Are Withdrawn? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in India.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
BHAVNANI, RIKHIL R.
2009.
Do Electoral Quotas Work after They Are Withdrawn? Evidence from a
Natural Experiment in India.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 103,
Issue. 1,
p.
23.
Rauchhaus, Robert
2009.
Evaluating the Nuclear Peace Hypothesis.
Journal of Conflict Resolution,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 2,
p.
258.
Jeong, G.-H.
Miller, G. J.
and
Sobel, A. C.
2009.
Political Compromise and Bureaucratic Structure: The Political Origins of the Federal Reserve System.
Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 2,
p.
472.
Peress, Michael
2009.
Small Chamber Ideal Point Estimation.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 3,
p.
276.
Liang, Bin
Lu, Hong
and
Taylor, Melanie
2009.
Female drug abusers, narcotics offenders, and legal punishment in China.
Journal of Criminal Justice,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 2,
p.
133.
Gill, Rebecca
2009.
The Fading Utility of the Australian Legalist Story: Using Social Background Theory to Explain Outcomes on the High Court.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Malesky, Edmund
2009.
Gerrymandering—Vietnamese Style: Escaping the Partial Reform Equilibrium in a Nondemocratic Regime.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 71,
Issue. 1,
p.
132.
Kosmidis, I.
and
Firth, D.
2009.
Bias reduction in exponential family nonlinear models.
Biometrika,
Vol. 96,
Issue. 4,
p.
793.
Aidt, Toke S.
and
Jensen, Peter S.
2009.
The taxman tools up: An event history study of the introduction of the personal income tax.
Journal of Public Economics,
Vol. 93,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
160.
Carter, David B.
and
Signorino, Curtis S.
2010.
Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 3,
p.
271.