Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:30:10.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biodiversity governance under the Arctic Council: The role of science, business and NGOs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2020

Christian Prip Open the ORCID record for Christian Prip [Opens in a new window]
Christian Prip*
Affiliation:
Fridtjof Nansen Institute, P.O. Box 326, 1326Lysaker, Norway
*
Author for correspondence: Christian Prip, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since its inception, the Arctic Council (AC) has focused on biodiversity, under its working group on the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna. By adopting a holistic, cross-sectoral approach to biodiversity governance, the AC has acknowledged that biodiversity is not only a matter for the Council and its governments: also non-state actors must be involved. This article analyses whether and how three essential non-state actors – science, business and NGOs – influence AC processes on Arctic biodiversity, comparing the roles of these actors on biodiversity governance in the wider international context. AC work on biodiversity has remained largely scientific, with fewer political commitments for states and the Council as such: science has had a significant influence, whereas there has been limited space for the involvement of the business sector. NGOs have served mainly as contributors and partners in scientific work, increasingly also assuming policy advocacy roles. This article notes the need for closer political cooperation on biodiversity in the AC, with firmer commitments for states and the AC, inspired by work in other AC focal areas.

Keywords

Arctic CouncilArctic governanceBiodiversityNon-state actors
Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 56 , 2020 , e12
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andresen, S., Rosendal, K., & Skjærseth, J. B. (2017). Designing knowledge-based, integrated management systems for environmental governance. In Dinar, A. (Ed.), Natural resources and environmental policy in the era of global change (pp. 439–456). Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Andresen, S., Skodvin, S. T., Underdal, A., & Wettestad, J. B. (2000). Science and politics in international environmental regimes. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Arctic Council website. Retrieved 2 July 2020 from: https://arctic-council.org/en/Google Scholar
Arctic Council (2013). Vision for the Arctic. Retrieved from: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/287Google Scholar
Arctic Council (2015a). Enhanced Black Carbon and Methane Emissions Reductions: An Arctic Council Framework for Action, 2015. Retrieved from: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/1430Google Scholar
Arctic Council (2015b). Arctic Marine Strategic Plan 2015–2025. Retrieved 2 July 2020 from: https://www.pame.is/index.php/projects/arctic-marine-strategic-plan-2015-2025Google Scholar
Arctic Council website. List of observes. Retrieved 2 July 2020 from: https://arctic-council.org/en/about/observers/Google Scholar
Arctic Economic Council (AEC). Retrieved 2 July 2020 from: https://arcticeconomiccouncil.com/Google Scholar
Arctic Economic Council (AEC) news release (2019). First joint meeting between the Arctic Council and the Arctic Economic Council. Retrieved from: https://arcticeconomiccouncil.com/first-joint-meeting-between-the-arctic-council-and-the-arctic-economic-council/Google Scholar
Barry, T., & Price, C. (2018). Arctic biodiversity: Challenges, The Circle, 1. Retrieved from: http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/TheCircle0118_WEB.pdfGoogle Scholar
CAFF (1991). Programme for the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna Framework.Google Scholar
CAFF (2013). Arctic biodiversity assessment: Report for policy makers. Akureyri, Iceland: CAFF.Google Scholar
CAFF (2015a). Actions for arctic biodiversity, 2013–2021: Implementing the recommendations of the Arctic Biodiversity Assessment. Akureyri, Iceland: Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna.Google Scholar
CAFF (2015b). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) scoping study for the arctic. Akureyri, Iceland: Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna.Google Scholar
CAFF (2017a). State of the arctic marine biodiversity report. Akureyri, Iceland: Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna International Secretariat. Retrieved from: https://www.arcticbiodiversity.is/marineGoogle Scholar
CAFF (2017b). Working document of 7 September 2017. A mainstreaming case study on the incorporation of biodiversity provisions into the work of a select industry.Google Scholar
CAFF (2019). Mainstreaming Biodiversity in Arctic Mining: Challenges and Proposed Solutions. Retrieved from: https://www.caff.is/strategies-series/468-mainstreaming-biodiversity-in-arctic-mining-challenges-and-proposed-solutionsGoogle Scholar
CAFF, CBMP. Retrieved from: https://www.caff.is/monitoringGoogle Scholar
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Secretariat (2014). Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Retrieved from: https://www.cbd.int/gbo/gbo4/publication/gbo4-en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Secretariat (2016). Final Report from 2016 Business and Biodiversity Forum, 2–3 December 2016. Retrieved from: https://www.cbd.int/business/doc/2016-bbf-report-en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (2018). Executive Summary of the Report of the Second Bogis-Bossey Dialogue for Biodiversity. Retrieved from: https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/04db/091f/110ebe2fd2822f6cf491a179/sbi-02-inf-35-en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Secretariat (2019). Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Discussion Paper. Retrieved from: https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/d431/b38f/3d580bb73e7c2b5aaa286310/post2020-prep-01-01-en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cooperation on Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue in the Arctic (2011). Retrieved 2 July 2020 from: https://www.ifrc.org/docs/idrl/N813EN.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cooperation on Marine Oil Pollution Preparedness and Response in the Arctic (2013). Retrieved 2 July 2020 from: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/529/EDOCS-2067-v1-ACMMSE08_KIRUNA_2013_agreement_on_oil_pollution_preparedness_and_response__in_the_arctic_formatted.PDF?sequence=5&isAllowed=yGoogle Scholar
Durfee, M., & Johnstone, R. L. (2019). Arctic governance in a changing world. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Durner, G. M., Laidre, K. L., & York, G. S. (2018). Polar Bears: Proceedings of the 18th Working Meeting of the IUCN/SSC Polar Bear Specialist Group, 7–11 June 2016, Anchorage, Alaska. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. Retrieved from: https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/SSC-OP-063-En.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eamer, J. (2016). Arctic biodiversity principles and their application in mainstreaming biodiversity. Phase 1: Background and options paper. Conservation of Artic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) working group.Google Scholar
Enhancing International Arctic Scientific Cooperation (2017). Retrieved 2 July 2020 from: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/1916Google Scholar
EU Business and Biodiversity Platform website. Retrieved 2 July 2020 from: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/biodiversity/business/index_en.htmGoogle Scholar
Global Partnership for Business and Biodiversity. Retrieved 2 July 2020 from: https://www.cbd.int/business/gp.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Graczyk, P., & Koivurova, T. (2015). The Arctic Council. In Jensen, L.F. & Hønneland, G., (Eds.), Handbook of the politics of the arctic. Edward Elgar https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857934741Google Scholar
Haas, P. M., Andresen, S., & Kanie, N. (2014). Introduction: Actor configurations and global environmental governance. In A. Kanie, & Haas (Eds.), Improving global environmental governance. Best practices for architecture and agency. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) (2018). Why biodiversity matters for business. News release issued for CBD, COP 14. Retrieved from: https://iccwbo.org/media-wall/news-speeches/biodiversity-matters-business/Google Scholar
IPBES. Retrieved 2 July 2020 from: https://www.ipbes.net/Google Scholar
IPIECA (Global Oil and Gas Industry Association for Environmental and Social Issues) (2011). Ecosystem services guidance: Biodiversity and ecosystem services guides and checklists. Retrieved from: http://www.sustainvalue.co.uk/assets/IPIECA%20ES%20guidance%20final.pdfGoogle Scholar
IUCN. Microplastics: A global disaster in the Arctic Ocean. Retrieved 2 July 2020 from: https://www.iucn.org/content/microplastics-global-disaster-arctic-oceanGoogle Scholar
IUCN website. Retrieved 2 July 2020 from: https://www.iucn.org/aboutGoogle Scholar
Kankaanpää, P., & Young, O. R. (2012). The effectiveness of the Arctic Council. Polar Research, 31, 17176. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/polar.v31i0.17176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knecht, S. (2018). New Observers Queuing Up: Why the Arctic Council should expand – and expel. Commentary on the Arctic Institute website. Retrieved from: https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/new-observers-queuing-up/Google Scholar
Koivurova, T. (2009). Governance of protected areas in the Arctic. Utrecht Law Review, 5(1). Special issue on Protected Areas in Environmental Law.Google Scholar
Koivurova, T. (2010). Limits and possibilities of the Arctic Council in a rapidly changing scene of Arctic governance. Polar Record, 46(237), 146–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koivurova, T., Kankaanpaa, P., & Stępien, A. (2015). Innovative environmental protection: Lessons from the arctic. Journal of Environmental Law. doi:10.1093/jel/equ037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koivurova, T. (2019). Is This the End of the Arctic Council and Arctic Governance as We Know It? Published in High North News 12 December 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/end-arctic-council-and-arctic-governance-we-know-itGoogle Scholar
Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2009). Environmental governance and political science. In Delmas, M. A. & Young, O. R. (Eds.), Governance for the environment: New perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lento, J., Goedkoop, W., Culp, L., Christoffersen, K., Fefilova, E., Guðbergsson, G., … Svenning, M. (2019). State of the arctic freshwater biodiversity. Akureyri, Iceland: Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna International Secretariat.Google Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. Retrieved from: https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdfGoogle Scholar
Natural Capital Coalition (2016). Natural Capital Protocol. Retrieved from: https://naturalcapitalcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/NCC_Protocol_WEB_2016-07-12-1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Nord, D. C. (2013). Creating a framework for consensus building and governance: An appraisal of the Swedish Arctic Council Chairmanship and the Kiruna Ministerial Meeting. (Heininen, L., Ed.), Arctic Yearbook. Akureyri, Iceland.Google Scholar
Nord, D. C. (2017). The challenge of Arctic Governance. The Wilson Quaterly. Retrieved from: https://www.wilsonquarterly.com/quarterly/into-the-arctic/the-challenge-of-arctic-governance/Google Scholar
Prip, C. (2016). The Arctic Council and biodiversity: Need for a stronger management framework? Nordisk Miljörättslig Tidskrift, 2, 37–53. Retrieved from: https://www.fni.no/publications/the-arctic-council-and-biodiversity-need-for-a-stronger-management-framework-article1076-290.htmlGoogle Scholar
Prip, C. (2019). Arctic Ocean governance in light of an of an international legally binding instrument on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction. Marine Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rottem, S. V. (2017). The Arctic Council between national and international governance. In Rottem, S. V. & Soltvedt, I.F. (Eds.), Arctic governance: Volume 1, law and politics. London, New York: I.B. Tauris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rottem, S. V., Prip, C., & Soltvedt, I. F. (2018). Arktisk råd i nasjonal forvaltning (The Arctic Council in national management.) FNI Report 2/2018. Retrieved from: https://www.fni.no/getfile.php/137985-1525071617/Dokumenter/FNI%202-2018%20SVR%2C%20CP%2C%20IFS.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rottem, S. V., Prip, C., & Soltvedt, I. F. (2020). Arktisk kunnskap i norsk forvaltning. (Arctic knowledge in Norwegian management. (In press)Google Scholar
Sands, P., & Peel, J. (2018). Principles of international environmental law, 4th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smieszek, M. (2019). Evaluating institutional effectiveness: The case of the Arctic Council. The Polar Journal, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2019.1618554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltvedt, I. F. (2017). Soft law, solid implementation? The influence of precision, monitoring and stakeholder involvement on Norwegian Implementation of Arctic Council Recommendations. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 8, 73–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v8.639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speer, L., Nelson, R., Casier, R., Gavrilo, M., von Quillfeldt, C., Cleary, J., … Hooper, P. (2017). Natural Marine World Heritage in the Arctic Ocean. Report of an expert workshop and review process. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Retrieved from: https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2017-006.pdfGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, P., & Dodds, K. (2015). The Arctic Council after Kiruna. Polar Record, 51(1), 108–110. Retrieved from: https://philsteinberg.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/polar-record-kiruna.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, C. (2014). Resilience and biodiversity governance. In Kanie, Andresen & Haas (Ed.), Improving global environmental governance: Best practices for architecture and agency. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Business). Retrieved 2 July 2020 from: http://www.teebweb.org/Google Scholar
TEEB (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Retrieved from: http://www.biodiversity.ru/programs/international/teeb/materials_teeb/TEEB_SynthReport_English.pdfGoogle Scholar
World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2010). Effective biodiversity and ecosystem policy and regulation. Business input to the COP10 of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved from: https://www.cbd.int/business/doc/WBCSD_Biodiversity_Ecosystem_Policy_Paper_COP%2010%20.pdfGoogle Scholar
WWF Factsheet, Global Arctic Programme (Undated). Retrieved from: http://d2ouvy59p0dg6k.cloudfront.net/downloads/global_arctic_programme_factsheet_2012_01_letter_english.pdfGoogle Scholar
WWF–Global Arctic Programme (2016). WWF Observer Report to the Arctic Council. Retrieved from: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/1882/EDOCS-3643-v1A-2016-06-01_WWF_Observer_Review-Report.PDF?sequence=1&isAllowed=yGoogle Scholar
WWF (2017). WWF Arctic Council Conservation Scorecard. Retrieved from: http://wwf-ap.org/apps/site/templates/downloads/wwf-arctic-council-conservation-scorecard-WEB.pdfGoogle Scholar