Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T09:00:03.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indigenous peoples as international political actors: a summary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2009

Monica Tennberg
Monica Tennberg*
Affiliation:
Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, Box 122, 96101 Rovaniemi, Finland ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article discusses the results of a three year research project studying international indigenous political activism using case studies from the Arctic. Drawing on two different disciplinary starting points, international relations and international law, the project addressed two interrelated questions. The first of these was how relations between states, international organisations and indigenous peoples have been and are currently constructed as legal and political practices; the second was how indigenous peoples construct their political agency through different strategies to further their political interests. These questions are addressed from the point of view of power relations. The power to act is the basic form of political agency. However, this power may take different forms of political action, for example, self-identification, participation, influence, and representation. The main conclusions of the article are: 1) indigenous political agency is based on multiple forms of power; 2) practices of power that enable and constrain indigenous political agency change over time; 3) power circulates and produces multiple sites of encounters for states, international organisations and indigenous people; 4) indigenous political agency is a question of acting; and 5) there are new challenges ahead for indigenous peoples in claiming a political voice, in particular in global climate politics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , July 2010 , pp. 264 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arts, B., Noortmann, M., and Reinalda, R.. 2002. Non-state actors in international relations. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Forrest, S. 2006. Indigenous self-determination in Finland: a case study in normative change. Polar Record 42 (222): 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 2007. Security, territory, population. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dean, M., and Hindess, B.. 1998. Introduction: government, liberalism, society. In: Dean, M., and Hindess, B. (editors). Governing Australia: studies in contemporary rationalities of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Franke, U., and Roos, U.. 2005. From collective actor to structure of collective acting. The meaning of human beings for the study of international relations. Istanbul, Budapest (paper prepared for presentation at the first World International Studies Conference in Istanbul, 24–27 August 2005, and the third Conference for the European Consortium for Political Research in Budapest, 8–10 September 2005).Google Scholar
Koivurova, T., and Heinämäki, L.. 2006. The participation of indigenous peoples in international norm-making in the Arctic. Polar Record 42 (221): 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koivurova, T. 2008. The draft Nordic Saami Convention: nations working together. International Community Law Review 10: 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuppe, R. 2009. The three dimensions of the rights of indigenous peoples. International Community Law Review 11: 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawlor, M. 2003. Indigenous internationalism: native rights and the UN. Comparative American Studies 1: 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindroth, M. 2006. Indigenous-state relations in the UN: establishing the indigenous forum. Polar Record 42 (222): 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loukacheva, N. 2009. Arctic indigenous peoples’ internationalism: in search of a legal justification. Polar Record 45 (23): 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayall, J. 1990. Nationalism and international society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNay, L. 2000. Gender and agency. Reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Moore, M. 2005. Internal minorities and indigenous self-determination. In: Eisenberg, A., and Spinner-Halev, J. (editors). Minorities within minorities. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moreton-Robinson, A. 2006. Towards a new research agenda? Foucault, whiteness and indigenous sovereignty. Journal of Sociology 42: 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, R. 2004. Advancing indigenous rights at the United Nations: strategic framing and its impact on the normative development of international law. Social and Legal Studies 13: 481–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, S.M. 2005. Multiculturalism and feminism: no simple question, no simple answer. In: Eisenberg, A., and Spinner-Halev, J. (editors), Minorities within minorities. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pentikäinen, M. 2009. Creating an integrated society, managing diversity and human rights in Europe. In: Bloed, A., Hofmann, R., Marko, J., Maynall, J., and Packer, J. (editors). European Yearbook of Minority Issues 2006–2007 vol 6. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff: 329–368.Google Scholar
Rose, N., and Miller, P.. 1992. Political power beyond the state: problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 172–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, A. 1999–2003. Long live post-disciplinary studies! Sociology and the curse of disciplinary parochialism/imperialism. Lancaster: Lancaster University, Department of Sociology. URL: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Sayer-Long-live-postdisciplinary-studies.pdf.Google Scholar
Shadian, J. 2006. Remaking Arctic governance: the construction of an Arctic Inuit polity. Polar Record 42 (222): 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, K. 2002. Indigeneity and the International. Millennium 31: 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semenova, T. 2006. Political mobilisation of northern indigenous peoples in Russia. Polar Record 43 (224): 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semenova, T. 2008a. Russian indigenous peoples as political actors. Rovaniemi: Arctic University of Lapland, Arctic Centre (guest lecture 8 December 2008).Google Scholar
Semenova, T. 2008b. Russian indigenous peoples of the north as political actors. Moscow (presentation at the INDIPO seminar 18 April 2008). URL: http://www.arcticcentre.org/includes/file_download.asp?deptid=28277&fileid=15710&file=20090312112811.pdf&pdf=1Google Scholar
Sending, O.J., and Neumann, I.B., 2006. Governance to governmentality: analyzing NGOs, states and power. International Studies Quarterly 50: 651–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinevaara-Niskanen, H. 2007. Pohjoisen poliittisissa yhteisöissä. Arktinen Neuvosto ja alkuperäiskansojen naisten toiminnan tilat [In northern political communities. Arctic Council and indigenous women's spaces of action]. In: Keskitalo-Foley, S., Autti, M., Naskali, P., and Sinevaara-Niskanen, H. (editors). Kuulumisia. Feministisiä tulkintoja naisten toimijuuksista [Feminist interpretations of women's agencies]. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland: 102–128.Google Scholar
Smith, K.E.L. 2007. A review of the study of political status of indigenous peoples in the global context. Sociology Compass 1 (2): 756–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester, C. 1996. The contributions of feminist theory to international relations. In: Smith, S., Booth, K., and Zalewski, M. (editors). International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tennberg, M. 2000. Arctic environmental cooperation. A study in governmentality. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Tennberg, M. 2006. Indigenous peoples as international political actors: presenting the INDIPO project. Polar Record 42 (221): 100CrossRefGoogle Scholar