Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:44:49.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

World Studies and Relational Comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Shu-Mei Shih
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A new kind of world studies is emerging. This is a world studies 2.0, since some forms of world studies, such as world literature, world music, and world cinema, have existed for some years in the humanities. These categories have been more narrowly defined and refer to literature, music, and cinema from places other than the West—that is, “the rest,” as seen from the West. In this vein, world literature has sometimes been euphemistically called “literature of the world at large,” conjuring a chase, if only halfhearted, after a world that somehow slipped away: at large.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 130 , Issue 2 , March 2015 , pp. 430 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Abu-Lughod, Janet L. Before European Hegemony: The World System, A.D. 1250-1350. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Aidi, Hisham D. “Let Us Be Moors: Islam, Race, and ‘Connected Histories.‘” Souls: A Critical Journal of Black Politics, Culture, and Society 7.1 (2005): 36–51. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. 1958. 2nd ed. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1998. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrighi, Giovanni. Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century. London: Verso, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Bose, Sugata. A Hundred Horizons: The Indian Ocean in the Age of Global Empire. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2006. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbank, Jane, and Cooper, Frederick. Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Chakravarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. Nationalist hought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse. New York: Zed, 1986. Print.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, K. N. Trade and Civilization in the Indian Ocean: An Economic History from the Rise of Islam to 1750. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1985. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, Robert. “Of Civilization and Savages: The Mimetic Imperialism of Japan's 1874 Expedition to Taiwan.” American Historical Review 107.2 (2002): 288-418. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, Joseph F. “Integrative History: Parallels and Interconnections in the Early Modern Period, 1500-1800.” Studies on Chinese and Islamic Inner Asia. Ed. Manz, Beatrice Forbes. Aldershot: Variorum, 1995. Ch. 10. Print.Google Scholar
Frank, Andre Gunder. ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley: U of California P, 1998. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Andre Gunder, and Gills, Barry K. The World System: Five Hundred Years or Five housand? New York: Routledge, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Frank, Joseph. The Idea of Spatial Form. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Glissant, Édouard. Poetics of Relation. Trans. Wing, Betsy. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1997. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamashita, Takeshi. China, East Asia and the Global Economy: Regional and Historical Perspectives. Ed. Grove, Linda and Selden, Mark. London: Routledge, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Harootunian, Harry, and Miyoshi, Masao, eds. Learning Places: The Afterlives of Area Studies. Durham: Duke UP, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Hobson, John M. The Eastern Origin of Western Civilization. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenin, Vladimir I. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism. 1917. New York: Penguin, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Levanthes, Louise. When China Ruled the Seas: The Treasure Fleet of the Dragon Throne, 1405-1433. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. “Conjectures on World Literature.” New Left Review 1 (2000): 54–68. Print.Google Scholar
Pearson, Michael. The Indian Ocean. New York: Routledge, 2003. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomoranz, Kenneth. The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of Modern World History. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. The World, the Text, and the Critic. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1983. Print.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich von. “The Nature and Value of Universal History: An Inaugural Lecture.” 1789. History and Theory 11.3 (1972): 321-34. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seigel, Micol. “Beyond Compare: Comparative Method after the Transnational Turn.” Radical History Review 91 (2005): 62–90. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, Shu-mei. “Comparison as Relation.” Comparison: Theories, Approaches, Uses. Ed. Felski, Rita and Friedman, Susan S. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2013. 79–98. Print.Google Scholar
Shih, Shu-mei. “Global Literature and the Technologies of Recognition.” PMLA 119.1 (2004): 16–30. Print.Google Scholar
Stoler, Ann Laura. Race and the Education of Desire: Foucault's History of Sexuality and the Colonial Order of Things. Durham: Duke UP, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, Sanjay. “Connected Histories: Notes towards a Reconfiguration of Early Modern Eurasia.” Beyond Binary Histories: Re-imagining Eurasia to c. 1830. Ed. Lieberman, Victor. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1999. 289–316. Print.Google Scholar
Barnes, Djuna. Explorations in Connected History: From the Tagus to the Ganges. New Delhi: Oxford UP, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Barnes, Djuna. “Holding the World in Balance: The Connected Histories of the Iberian Overseas Empires, 1500-1640.” American Historical Review 112.5 (2007): 1359–85. Print.Google Scholar
“What Is World History?” World History Association. World Hist. Assn., 2014. Web. 24 Oct. 2014.Google Scholar